From patchwork Mon Feb 22 09:37:50 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shannon Zhao X-Patchwork-Id: 62527 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.112.43.199 with SMTP id y7csp1122815lbl; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:41:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.191.202 with SMTP id ha10mr36948249pac.8.1456134107904; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:41:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ki7si38659087pab.7.2016.02.22.01.41.47 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:41:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:1868:205::9; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aXmyc-0003kO-OW; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:40:22 +0000 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aXmyY-0002JR-5g for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:40:20 +0000 Received: from 172.24.1.51 (EHLO szxeml434-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.51]) by szxrg03-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.4.3-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BWL63332; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:39:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from HGHY1Z002260041.china.huawei.com (10.177.16.142) by szxeml434-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.225) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:38:54 +0800 From: Shannon Zhao To: , , Subject: [PATCH v12 14/21] KVM: ARM64: Add helper to handle PMCR register bits Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:37:50 +0800 Message-ID: <1456133877-9584-15-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.0.msysgit.0 In-Reply-To: <1456133877-9584-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> References: <1456133877-9584-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.177.16.142] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.56CAD735.012B, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-05-26 15:14:31, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: ed08e7200a8f578805d8a6bba199f51a X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20160222_014018_666505_89AF688E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.90 ) X-Spam-Score: -4.2 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-4.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [119.145.14.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [119.145.14.66 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: wei@redhat.com, hangaohuai@huawei.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, shannon.zhao@linaro.org, zhaoshenglong@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, cov@codeaurora.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org From: Shannon Zhao According to ARMv8 spec, when writing 1 to PMCR.E, all counters are enabled by PMCNTENSET, while writing 0 to PMCR.E, all counters are disabled. When writing 1 to PMCR.P, reset all event counters, not including PMCCNTR, to zero. When writing 1 to PMCR.C, reset PMCCNTR to zero. Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 1 + include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 2 ++ virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+) -- 2.0.4 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index f31023b..f1866c3 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, val &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK; val |= p->regval & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_MASK; vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = val; + kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu, val); } else { /* PMCR.P & PMCR.C are RAZ */ val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h index 348c4c9..8bc92d1 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); +void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, u64 select_idx); #else @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ static inline void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} +static inline void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, u64 select_idx) {} #endif diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c index 9fc775e..cda869c 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c @@ -210,6 +210,40 @@ void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) } } +/** + * kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr - handle PMCR register + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer + * @val: the value guest writes to PMCR register + */ +void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) +{ + struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu; + struct kvm_pmc *pmc; + u64 mask; + int i; + + mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu); + if (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) { + kvm_pmu_enable_counter(vcpu, + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCNTENSET_EL0) & mask); + } else { + kvm_pmu_disable_counter(vcpu, mask); + } + + if (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_C) + kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(vcpu, ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX, 0); + + if (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P) { + for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX; i++) + kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(vcpu, i, 0); + } + + if (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC) { + pmc = &pmu->pmc[ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX]; + pmc->bitmask = 0xffffffffffffffffUL; + } +} + static bool kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx) { return (vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) &&