Message ID | 20230410160200.57261-1-joelselvaraj.oss@gmail.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add support for Focaltech FTS Touchscreen | expand |
On 10/04/2023 18:01, Joel Selvaraj wrote: > Add devicetree bindings for the Focaltech FTS touchscreen drivers. > Subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings for". The "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings. > Signed-off-by: Joel Selvaraj <joelselvaraj.oss@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech> > --- > .../input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts5452.yaml | 71 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts5452.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts5452.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts5452.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..f42868293439 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts5452.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/touchscreen/focaltech,fts5452.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Focaltech FTS I2C Touchscreen Controller > + > +maintainers: > + - Joel Selvaraj <joelselvaraj.oss@gmail.com> > + - Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech> > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: touchscreen.yaml# > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - focaltech,fts5452 > + - focaltech,fts8719 > + > + reg: > + const: 0x38 > + > + interrupts: > + maxItems: 1 > + > + reset-gpios: > + maxItems: 1 > + > + avdd-supply: > + description: regulator supplying analog power (2.6V to 3.3V). > + > + vddio-supply: > + description: regulator supplying IO power (1.8V). > + > +unevaluatedProperties: false > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + - touchscreen-size-x > + - touchscreen-size-y We always put required: before unevaluatedProperties. Base your schema on example-schema.yaml. Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski, Konrad Dybcio suggested to use interrupts-extended instead interrupts. So in my WIP v3, I have updated it in the dts and bindings example. However, I am confused if I should replace the "interrupts" with "interrupts-extended" property in the schema too? I see a lot of schemas specifying "interrupts", with examples using "interrupts" or "interrupts-extended". At the same time, I see some specifying both "interrupts" and "interrupts-extended" (like one of these two) and very few others specify only "interrupts-extended" in the schema. Which is the currently recommended way to do this? In between, the interrupt property should be a required property as the driver will not function without an interrupt. I will fix that in v3. Thanks, Joel Selvaraj
On 14/04/2023 02:32, Joel Selvaraj wrote: > Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski, > > Konrad Dybcio suggested to use interrupts-extended instead interrupts. Sorry, I have no idea what this email is about. There is no context here, no reply, it just appeared alone in my inbox without any reference. Please respond inline to existing messages, keeping necessary context you are replying to. > So in my WIP v3, I have updated it in the dts and bindings example. > However, I am confused if I should replace the "interrupts" with > "interrupts-extended" property in the schema too? I see a lot of schemas No. > specifying "interrupts", with examples using "interrupts" or > "interrupts-extended". At the same time, I see some specifying both > "interrupts" and "interrupts-extended" (like one of these two) and very > few others specify only "interrupts-extended" in the schema. Which is > the currently recommended way to do this? > > In between, the interrupt property should be a required property as the > driver will not function without an interrupt. I will fix that in v3. > > Thanks, > Joel Selvaraj Best regards, Krzysztof