From patchwork Thu Oct 6 14:38:34 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matti Vaittinen X-Patchwork-Id: 613604 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F76C433FE for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 14:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231594AbiJFOit (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2022 10:38:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33880 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231591AbiJFOis (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2022 10:38:48 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FACEABF20; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 07:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id q17so2447367lji.11; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 07:38:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=4Sm8s8c+2l2jCb6IDRMALO+KLZhQiZAZcnY2ahLVTf8=; b=YXp15G7EtvmIjMpScFLm6MWIauhQnkHAPtqZv/KXDgWRzVLm+4p8FBNLu7HAgh41qr n5dozBqCScAo4+qdmZvlGbT/zmsrsJwYlwyYLektvgNz4b1pqPqIv017YSSNyps1x2CB JSGPPUs5wlOaG4HDzrumj6CGEII/FDdZduN//tzX9vMXQrFptw5HPc/UYI3cb3XJSutR sC0x5uFIE5AGErtQ+OrpugGqcPCId+I7y9BLxxHNJIiEj+wNABLTKZQ9mApEcsaOqInS 3jjmHmm6wwL5S0cz7tMY7z+0pxNHSSNQcIklYnOdotu84Y+cRzdPTaynJIk1Y/a7XcQv z5Yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=4Sm8s8c+2l2jCb6IDRMALO+KLZhQiZAZcnY2ahLVTf8=; b=zmCufkuMXm5vLHwqpJIiqAff8enDkrLaPLqnA5lXdSxuhsSUUrtXglSDhN+6BZX4Zg 42yK/BrRIoxaTpw+GXxcgAyIqSgUfekdns99uwESGClOIGlSyaCKhayBdx++bEypnHlv yDv005FQbU7y8UZ9taSxnjS7U+olGkYHlvJIeUcxj8KnNfXLsasaJIkVwoLDvs4pKjjv lNOWdaCnuW18z+jqOOA/S3UnjZYTYPXVEgWZ806Ff3Ltf8WeWXpKeSbz0/YAlfTlLMR9 Cil7b8iIjMI6jyTZ1rZNxd1mhKMbCYwaHT5qjXtBfAZYX+WNXYBj1MyuO1fKHCiAo7ns sjuw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2mEdYm2K9ihUhwgKBkECKJwQfoea+taFSdVd0waCajncAKxwgy WhO7RRbPEU4CfTXF3ln09oA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5hZErXB7J0DZe0eFjXNqQDe51vaUZChbt0mrmZ3z+HbZkgDRfCkw0KEj5GA9ainxWqELlvrw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1949:b0:26d:cf6d:54a6 with SMTP id bs9-20020a05651c194900b0026dcf6d54a6mr1924384ljb.3.1665067120934; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 07:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dc75zzyyyyyyyyyyyyyyt-3.rev.dnainternet.fi (dc75zzyyyyyyyyyyyyyyt-3.rev.dnainternet.fi. [2001:14ba:16f3:4a00::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g23-20020a2eb5d7000000b0026e059a3455sm81670ljn.51.2022.10.06.07.38.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Oct 2022 07:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 17:38:34 +0300 From: Matti Vaittinen To: Matti Vaittinen , Matti Vaittinen Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Matti Vaittinen , Andy Shevchenko , Jagath Jog J , Nikita Yushchenko , Cosmin Tanislav , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add KX022A maintainer entry Message-ID: <08ccdc318b448eb69c82efc82adcd044536df4af.1665066397.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Add maintainer entry for ROHM/Kionix KX022A accelerometer senor driver. Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen --- I can also add myself as a maintainer instead of a reviewer if it better suits iio maintainer. I however don't plan setting up my own public repository and hope the further patches will be merged via IIO tree. So, as Geert once explained to me - In that case the difference between me as a maintainer vs. a reviewer would be only really relevant to the subsystem (in this case IIO) maintainer. The subsystem maintainer who merges patches is allowed to take in changes acked by downstream maintainer w/o obligation to do thorough review. (Downstream maintainer is to be blamed if things explode :]). If ack is given by a reviewer, then the subsystem maintainer has the full responsibility and should always do the review. Or - this is how I remember our discussion went - feel free to correct me if I am wrong :] In any case - please let me know if you'd rather see M: not R: in front of my name for the kx022a. --- MAINTAINERS | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index f5ca4aefd184..641b4fc2e5e2 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -11356,6 +11356,11 @@ F: drivers/mfd/khadas-mcu.c F: include/linux/mfd/khadas-mcu.h F: drivers/thermal/khadas_mcu_fan.c +KIONIX/ROHM KX022A ACCELEROMETER +R: Matti Vaittinen +S: Supported +F: drivers/iio/accel/kionix-kx022a* + KMEMLEAK M: Catalin Marinas S: Maintained