Message ID | 20220405234343.74045-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mm, x86/cc: Implement support for unaccepted memory | expand |
On 4/5/22 16:43, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Patches 1-6/7 are generic and don't have any dependencies on TDX. They > should serve AMD SEV needs as well. TDX-specific code isolated in the > last patch. Oh, that's quite nice. Are the SEV-SNP folks planning on using this? If they are, acks/reviews would be much appreciated.
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 10:02:13AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 4/5/22 16:43, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Patches 1-6/7 are generic and don't have any dependencies on TDX. They > > should serve AMD SEV needs as well. TDX-specific code isolated in the > > last patch. > > Oh, that's quite nice. Are the SEV-SNP folks planning on using this? > If they are, acks/reviews would be much appreciated. AMD folks tested one of previous revision and reported that it works, but I don't remember seeing the code that hook ups AMD implementation.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 02:44:58AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 10:02:13AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > On 4/5/22 16:43, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > Patches 1-6/7 are generic and don't have any dependencies on TDX. They > > > should serve AMD SEV needs as well. TDX-specific code isolated in the > > > last patch. > > > > Oh, that's quite nice. Are the SEV-SNP folks planning on using this? > > If they are, acks/reviews would be much appreciated. > > AMD folks tested one of previous revision and reported that it works, but > I don't remember seeing the code that hook ups AMD implementation. Yes, they will be using this eventually.