mbox series

[00/10] Add Power Domains and Regulators in SDX75

Message ID 1688395346-3126-1-git-send-email-quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com
Headers show
Series Add Power Domains and Regulators in SDX75 | expand

Message

Rohit Agarwal July 3, 2023, 2:42 p.m. UTC
Hello,

This series adds driver and dt-bindings related changes
in SDX75 to add power domains and regulators.

Thanks,
Rohit.

Rohit Agarwal (10):
  dt-bindings: regulator: Add PMX75 compatibles
  dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domains for SDX75
  dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible for pm7550ba
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom-pmic-gpio: Add pm7550ba support
  dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible for pmx75
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom-pmic-gpio: Add pmx75 support
  soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Add SDX75 power domains
  regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add support for SDX75
  pinctrl: qcom-pmic-gpio: Add support for pm7550ba
  pinctrl: qcom-pmic-gpio: Add support for pmx75

 .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml    |  2 ++
 .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml           |  6 ++++
 .../devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml      |  1 +
 .../bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml    |  2 ++
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c           |  2 ++
 drivers/regulator/qcom-rpmh-regulator.c            | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c                          | 16 +++++++++
 include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h             |  8 +++++
 8 files changed, 75 insertions(+)

Comments

Rohit Agarwal July 4, 2023, 6:17 a.m. UTC | #1
On 7/3/2023 8:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 3.07.2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>> Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 +
>>   include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h                  | 8 ++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>> index afad313..58e1be8 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties:
>>         - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd
>>         - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd
>>         - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd
>> +      - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd
>>         - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd
>>         - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd
>>         - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>> index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
>>   #define SDX65_CX_AO	4
>>   #define SDX65_MXC	5
>>   
>> +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */
>> +#define SDX75_CX	0
>> +#define SDX75_CX_AO	1
>> +#define SDX75_MSS	2
>> +#define SDX75_MX	3
>> +#define SDX75_MX_AO	4
>> +#define SDX75_MXC	5
> Please instead introduce a set of defines without the SoC prefix
> (i.e. CX, CX_AO, MX etc.). We've been putting this off for too long
> and you're the first unlucky guy that submitted new RPMhPD support after
> we've concluded it'd be the way to go! :D Sadly, we can't replace the
> existing ones retroactively..
Surely No issues. Will update it.

Thanks,
Rohit.
> Konrad
>> +
>>   /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */
>>   #define SM6350_CX	0
>>   #define SM6350_GFX	1
Krzysztof Kozlowski July 4, 2023, 6:24 a.m. UTC | #2
On 03/07/2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> Add compatible for pmic pmx75 used in Snapdragon series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 1 +


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Rohit Agarwal July 4, 2023, 6:45 a.m. UTC | #3
On 7/4/2023 11:51 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/07/2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>> Add PMX75 compatibles for PMIC found in SDX75 platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml
>> index b949850..cc72144 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.yaml
>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ description: |
>>         For PMR735A, smps1 - smps3, ldo1 - ldo7
>>         For PMX55, smps1 - smps7, ldo1 - ldo16
>>         For PMX65, smps1 - smps8, ldo1 - ldo21
>> +      For PMX75, smps1 - smps10, ldo1 - ldo21
>>   
>>   properties:
>>     compatible:
>> @@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ properties:
>>         - qcom,pmr735a-rpmh-regulators
>>         - qcom,pmx55-rpmh-regulators
>>         - qcom,pmx65-rpmh-regulators
>> +      - qcom,pmx75-rpmh-regulators
> You miss the update to the if:then: parts.
Thanks for your time. Will add that part as well.

Thanks,
Rohit.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Rohit Agarwal July 5, 2023, 11:20 a.m. UTC | #4
On 7/5/2023 4:13 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 5.07.2023 10:54, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>> On 7/4/2023 11:47 AM, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>>> On 7/3/2023 8:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 3.07.2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>>>>> Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 +
>>>>>    include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h                  | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>    2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>>>>> index afad313..58e1be8 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
>>>>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties:
>>>>>          - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd
>>>>>          - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd
>>>>>          - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd
>>>>> +      - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd
>>>>>          - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd
>>>>>          - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd
>>>>>          - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd
>>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>>>>> index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
>>>>> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
>>>>>    #define SDX65_CX_AO    4
>>>>>    #define SDX65_MXC    5
>>>>>    +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */
>>>>> +#define SDX75_CX    0
>>>>> +#define SDX75_CX_AO    1
>>>>> +#define SDX75_MSS    2
>>>>> +#define SDX75_MX    3
>>>>> +#define SDX75_MX_AO    4
>>>>> +#define SDX75_MXC    5
>>>> Please instead introduce a set of defines without the SoC prefix
>>>> (i.e. CX, CX_AO, MX etc.). We've been putting this off for too long
>>>> and you're the first unlucky guy that submitted new RPMhPD support after
>>>> we've concluded it'd be the way to go! :D Sadly, we can't replace the
>>>> existing ones retroactively..
>>> Surely No issues. Will update it.
>> I have a doubt here. Cant we completely omit the #defines here and directly index this as 0,1,...
>> because if the intention of this #defines is to understand the name of the pd then we can get
>> it from the .name attribute in rpmhpd as well, right?
>>
>> The problems with a common set of #define would be, lets say if we define CX_AO as 1 and some platform
>> doesn't have CX_AO then wouldnt it leave a null entry in the driver entry of that platform?
> Yes.
>
> We already do this in the rpmh clock driver, as:
>
> 1. there are domains that all chips share (like CX etc.)
> 2. wasting a couple of bytes lets us massively save on convolution
Ok, got it. Looks cleaner.

Thanks,
Rohit.
>
> Konrad
>> Thanks,
>> Rohit.
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rohit.
>>>> Konrad
>>>>> +
>>>>>    /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */
>>>>>    #define SM6350_CX    0
>>>>>    #define SM6350_GFX    1
Lee Jones July 13, 2023, 1:31 p.m. UTC | #5
On Mon, 03 Jul 2023, Rohit Agarwal wrote:

> Add compatible for pmic pmx75 used in Snapdragon series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Applied, thanks