Message ID | 20230515135801.15220-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | RSEQ selftests updates | expand |
Hi Peter, Can you queue those fixes through your tree ? Thanks, Mathieu On 5/15/23 09:57, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi, > > You will find in this series updates to the rseq selftests, mainly > bringing fixes from librseq project back into the RSEQ selftests. > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > Mathieu Desnoyers (4): > selftests/rseq: Fix CID_ID typo in Makefile > selftests/rseq: Implement rseq_unqual_scalar_typeof > selftests/rseq: Fix arm64 buggy load-acquire/store-release macros > selftests/rseq: Use rseq_unqual_scalar_typeof in macros > > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/Makefile | 2 +- > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/compiler.h | 26 ++++++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h | 4 +- > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm64.h | 58 ++++++++++++----------- > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-mips.h | 4 +- > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-ppc.h | 4 +- > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-riscv.h | 6 +-- > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-s390.h | 4 +- > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-x86.h | 4 +- > 9 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) >
On 6/6/23 07:36, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Can you queue those fixes through your tree ? > Peter, Mathieu, Doesn't look like this series has been pickedup? I can take these in for 6.6-rc1 if there are no dependencies on other trees. thanks, -- Shuah
On 8/7/23 14:53, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 6/6/23 07:36, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Can you queue those fixes through your tree ? >> > > > Peter, Mathieu, > > Doesn't look like this series has been pickedup? Not AFAIK. Peter, if you have this somewhere in your tip queue, please let us know. > > I can take these in for 6.6-rc1 if there are no dependencies > on other trees. It should not have dependencies with other trees. Thanks, Mathieu > > thanks, > -- Shuah > > >
On 8/7/23 13:38, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > On 8/7/23 14:53, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 6/6/23 07:36, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> Can you queue those fixes through your tree ? >>> >> >> >> Peter, Mathieu, >> >> Doesn't look like this series has been pickedup? > > Not AFAIK. Peter, if you have this somewhere in your tip queue, please let us know. > >> >> I can take these in for 6.6-rc1 if there are no dependencies >> on other trees. > > It should not have dependencies with other trees. > Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.6-rc1. thanks, -- Shuah