Message ID | 20240507214254.2787305-1-edliaw@google.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Define _GNU_SOURCE for sources using | expand |
On 5/9/24 00:13, Edward Liaw wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:10 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >> On 5/7/24 15:38, Edward Liaw wrote: >>> 809216233555 ("selftests/harness: remove use of LINE_MAX") introduced >>> asprintf into kselftest_harness.h, which is a GNU extension and needs >>> _GNU_SOURCE to either be defined prior to including headers or with the >>> -D_GNU_SOURCE flag passed to the compiler. >>> >>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20240430235057.1351993-1-edliaw@google.com/ >>> v2: add -D_GNU_SOURCE to KHDR_INCLUDES so that it is in a single >>> location. Remove #define _GNU_SOURCE from source code to resolve >>> redefinition warnings. >>> >>> Edward Liaw (5): >>> selftests: Compile kselftest headers with -D_GNU_SOURCE >>> selftests/sgx: Include KHDR_INCLUDES in Makefile >> >> I appled patches 1/5 and 2.5 - The rest need to be split up. >> >>> selftests: Include KHDR_INCLUDES in Makefile >>> selftests: Drop define _GNU_SOURCE >>> selftests: Drop duplicate -D_GNU_SOURCE >>> >> >> Please split these patches pwe test directory. Otherwise it will >> cause merge conflicts which can be hard to resolve. > > Hi Shuah, > Sean asked that I rebase the patches on linux-next, and I will need to > remove additional _GNU_SOURCE defines. Should I send an unsplit v3 to > be reviewed, then split it afterwards? I'm concerned that it will be > difficult to review with ~70 patches once split. Please send them split - it will be easier to review and apply. You might as well wait until the merge window is done. I don't think anybody would have time to review now since merge window starts next week. thanks, -- Shuah
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 7:37 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On 5/9/24 00:13, Edward Liaw wrote: > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:10 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> > >> On 5/7/24 15:38, Edward Liaw wrote: > >>> 809216233555 ("selftests/harness: remove use of LINE_MAX") introduced > >>> asprintf into kselftest_harness.h, which is a GNU extension and needs > >>> _GNU_SOURCE to either be defined prior to including headers or with the > >>> -D_GNU_SOURCE flag passed to the compiler. > >>> > >>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20240430235057.1351993-1-edliaw@google.com/ > >>> v2: add -D_GNU_SOURCE to KHDR_INCLUDES so that it is in a single > >>> location. Remove #define _GNU_SOURCE from source code to resolve > >>> redefinition warnings. > >>> > >>> Edward Liaw (5): > >>> selftests: Compile kselftest headers with -D_GNU_SOURCE > >>> selftests/sgx: Include KHDR_INCLUDES in Makefile > >> > >> I appled patches 1/5 and 2.5 - The rest need to be split up. > >> > >>> selftests: Include KHDR_INCLUDES in Makefile > >>> selftests: Drop define _GNU_SOURCE > >>> selftests: Drop duplicate -D_GNU_SOURCE > >>> > >> > >> Please split these patches pwe test directory. Otherwise it will > >> cause merge conflicts which can be hard to resolve. > > > > Hi Shuah, > > Sean asked that I rebase the patches on linux-next, and I will need to > > remove additional _GNU_SOURCE defines. Should I send an unsplit v3 to > > be reviewed, then split it afterwards? I'm concerned that it will be > > difficult to review with ~70 patches once split. > > Please send them split - it will be easier to review and apply. You > might as well wait until the merge window is done. I don't think > anybody would have time to review now since merge window starts > next week. Sorry, I have them split already; is it ok if I send them now? I will be on leave soon and may not be able to get back to it in a while. Thanks, Edward > > > thanks, > -- Shuah
On 5/9/24 10:45 PM, Edward Liaw wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 7:37 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >> On 5/9/24 00:13, Edward Liaw wrote: >>> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:10 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 5/7/24 15:38, Edward Liaw wrote: >>>>> 809216233555 ("selftests/harness: remove use of LINE_MAX") introduced >>>>> asprintf into kselftest_harness.h, which is a GNU extension and needs >>>>> _GNU_SOURCE to either be defined prior to including headers or with the >>>>> -D_GNU_SOURCE flag passed to the compiler. >>>>> >>>>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20240430235057.1351993-1-edliaw@google.com/ >>>>> v2: add -D_GNU_SOURCE to KHDR_INCLUDES so that it is in a single >>>>> location. Remove #define _GNU_SOURCE from source code to resolve >>>>> redefinition warnings. >>>>> >>>>> Edward Liaw (5): >>>>> selftests: Compile kselftest headers with -D_GNU_SOURCE >>>>> selftests/sgx: Include KHDR_INCLUDES in Makefile >>>> >>>> I appled patches 1/5 and 2.5 - The rest need to be split up. >>>> >>>>> selftests: Include KHDR_INCLUDES in Makefile >>>>> selftests: Drop define _GNU_SOURCE >>>>> selftests: Drop duplicate -D_GNU_SOURCE >>>>> >>>> >>>> Please split these patches pwe test directory. Otherwise it will >>>> cause merge conflicts which can be hard to resolve. >>> >>> Hi Shuah, >>> Sean asked that I rebase the patches on linux-next, and I will need to >>> remove additional _GNU_SOURCE defines. Should I send an unsplit v3 to >>> be reviewed, then split it afterwards? I'm concerned that it will be >>> difficult to review with ~70 patches once split. >> >> Please send them split - it will be easier to review and apply. You >> might as well wait until the merge window is done. I don't think >> anybody would have time to review now since merge window starts >> next week. > > Sorry, I have them split already; is it ok if I send them now? I will > be on leave soon and may not be able to get back to it in a while. Feel free to send the patches. There is no restriction on that. > > Thanks, > Edward > >> >> >> thanks, >> -- Shuah >