Message ID | 20230529201914.69828-2-bpoirier@nvidia.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [net-next,1/4] nexthop: Factor out hash threshold fdb nexthop selection | expand |
On 5/29/23 2:19 PM, Benjamin Poirier wrote: > diff --git a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c > index f95142e56da0..27089dea0ed0 100644 > --- a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c > +++ b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c > @@ -1152,11 +1152,31 @@ static bool ipv4_good_nh(const struct fib_nh *nh) > return !!(state & NUD_VALID); > } > > +static struct nexthop *nexthop_select_path_fdb(struct nh_group *nhg, int hash) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < nhg->num_nh; i++) { > + struct nh_grp_entry *nhge = &nhg->nh_entries[i]; > + > + if (hash > atomic_read(&nhge->hthr.upper_bound)) > + continue; > + > + return nhge->nh; > + } > + > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); I do not see how the stack is going to provide useful information; it should always be vxlan_xmit ... nexthop_select_path_fdb, right? besides that: Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
On 2023-05-30 08:57 -0600, David Ahern wrote: > On 5/29/23 2:19 PM, Benjamin Poirier wrote: > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c > > index f95142e56da0..27089dea0ed0 100644 > > --- a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c > > +++ b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c > > @@ -1152,11 +1152,31 @@ static bool ipv4_good_nh(const struct fib_nh *nh) > > return !!(state & NUD_VALID); > > } > > > > +static struct nexthop *nexthop_select_path_fdb(struct nh_group *nhg, int hash) > > +{ > > + int i; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < nhg->num_nh; i++) { > > + struct nh_grp_entry *nhge = &nhg->nh_entries[i]; > > + > > + if (hash > atomic_read(&nhge->hthr.upper_bound)) > > + continue; > > + > > + return nhge->nh; > > + } > > + > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); > > I do not see how the stack is going to provide useful information; it > should always be vxlan_xmit ... nexthop_select_path_fdb, right? Not always, it is also possible to have a resilient nhg with fdb nexthops. In that case, nexthop_select_path_fdb() is not called. In practice, I tried such a configuration and it does not work well. I have prepared a fix that I'll send after the current series has been dealt with. Sorry for the long delay before my reply.
diff --git a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c index f95142e56da0..27089dea0ed0 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c +++ b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c @@ -1152,11 +1152,31 @@ static bool ipv4_good_nh(const struct fib_nh *nh) return !!(state & NUD_VALID); } +static struct nexthop *nexthop_select_path_fdb(struct nh_group *nhg, int hash) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < nhg->num_nh; i++) { + struct nh_grp_entry *nhge = &nhg->nh_entries[i]; + + if (hash > atomic_read(&nhge->hthr.upper_bound)) + continue; + + return nhge->nh; + } + + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return NULL; +} + static struct nexthop *nexthop_select_path_hthr(struct nh_group *nhg, int hash) { struct nexthop *rc = NULL; int i; + if (nhg->fdb_nh) + return nexthop_select_path_fdb(nhg, hash); + for (i = 0; i < nhg->num_nh; ++i) { struct nh_grp_entry *nhge = &nhg->nh_entries[i]; struct nh_info *nhi; @@ -1165,8 +1185,6 @@ static struct nexthop *nexthop_select_path_hthr(struct nh_group *nhg, int hash) continue; nhi = rcu_dereference(nhge->nh->nh_info); - if (nhi->fdb_nh) - return nhge->nh; /* nexthops always check if it is good and does * not rely on a sysctl for this behavior