@@ -11110,9 +11110,7 @@ static const char *arch_specific_syscall_pfx(void)
#elif defined(__riscv)
return "riscv";
#elif defined(__powerpc__)
- return "powerpc";
-#elif defined(__powerpc64__)
- return "powerpc64";
+ return "";
#else
return NULL;
#endif
@@ -11127,7 +11125,11 @@ int probe_kern_syscall_wrapper(int token_fd)
if (!ksys_pfx)
return 0;
+#if defined(__powerpc__)
+ snprintf(syscall_name, sizeof(syscall_name), "sys_bpf");
+#else
snprintf(syscall_name, sizeof(syscall_name), "__%s_sys_bpf", ksys_pfx);
+#endif
if (determine_kprobe_perf_type() >= 0) {
int pfd;
@@ -11272,8 +11274,12 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_ksyscall(const struct bpf_program *prog,
* compiler does not know that we have an explicit conditional
* as well.
*/
+#if defined(__powerpc__)
+ snprintf(func_name, sizeof(func_name), "sys_%s", syscall_name);
+#else
snprintf(func_name, sizeof(func_name), "__%s_sys_%s",
arch_specific_syscall_pfx() ? : "", syscall_name);
+#endif
} else {
snprintf(func_name, sizeof(func_name), "__se_sys_%s", syscall_name);
}
Since commit 94746890202cf ("powerpc: Don't add __powerpc_ prefix to syscall entry points") drops _powerpc prefix to syscall entry points, even though powerpc now supports syscall wrapper, so /proc/kallsyms have symbols for syscall entry without powerpc prefix(sys_*). For this reason, arch specific prefix for syscall functions in powerpc is dropped. Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com> --- tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)