| Message ID | 341feff384c9f8a20ed4aac6e2dda0440d6b84f2.1687515463.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | RISCV: Add KVM_GET_REG_LIST API | expand |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:40:10PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a > function so we can check for specific errno for specific register. > This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv. > > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 8 ++++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 7 ++++++- > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c > index aaf035c969ec..4e2e1fe833eb 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c > @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg) > return false; > } > > +bool reject_set_fail(__u64 reg) > +{ > + if (reg == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS) > + return (errno != EPERM); > + > + return false; > +} I think we should pass errno in as a parameter and I prefer positive predicate functions, so I'd name this check_reject_set() and reverse the logic. Also, we don't want to check for KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS, because that duplicates the rejects set. I see in a later patch that riscv needs to check reg because different errors are used for different registers, but that's because KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(state) was erroneously added to the rejects set. KVM_REG_RISCV_TIMER_REG(state) doesn't belong there. That register can be set, but it only supports certain input, otherwise, it correctly, results in EINVAL. We'll need the concept of a "skip set" to avoid tripping over that one. So, I think arm's function should be bool check_reject_set(int errno) { return errno == EPERM; } and riscv's should be bool check_reject_set(int errno) { return errno == EOPNOTSUPP; } > + > #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) > > #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS 2 > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > index f6ad7991a812..b956ee410996 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c > @@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) > printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); > } > > +bool __weak reject_set_fail(__u64 reg) > +{ > + return false; > +} > + > #ifdef __aarch64__ > static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) > { > @@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) > if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { > reject_reg = true; > ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); > - if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) { > + if (ret != -1 || reject_set_fail(reg.id)) { > printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno); > print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); > putchar('\n'); > -- > 2.34.1 > Thanks, drew
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c index aaf035c969ec..4e2e1fe833eb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg) return false; } +bool reject_set_fail(__u64 reg) +{ + if (reg == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS) + return (errno != EPERM); + + return false; +} + #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS 2 diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c index f6ad7991a812..b956ee410996 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c @@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); } +bool __weak reject_set_fail(__u64 reg) +{ + return false; +} + #ifdef __aarch64__ static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) { @@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { reject_reg = true; ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); - if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) { + if (ret != -1 || reject_set_fail(reg.id)) { printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno); print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); putchar('\n');
No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a function so we can check for specific errno for specific register. This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv. Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 8 ++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)