| Message ID | 20230823061734.27479-1-wenchao.chen@unisoc.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | mmc: hsq: Dynamically adjust hsq_depth to improve performance | expand |
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 6:26 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 08:18, Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen@unisoc.com> wrote: > > > > Change in v2: > > - Support for dynamic adjustment of hsq_depth. > > > > Test > > ===== > > I tested 3 times for each case and output a average speed. > > Ran 'fio' to evaluate the performance: > > 1.Fixed hsq_depth > > 1) Sequential write: > > Speed: 168 164 165 > > Average speed: 165.67MB/S > > > > 2) Sequential read: > > Speed: 326 326 326 > > Average speed: 326MB/S > > > > 3) Random write: > > Speed: 82.6 83 83 > > Average speed: 82.87MB/S > > > > 4) Random read: > > Speed: 48.2 48.3 47.6 > > Average speed: 48.03MB/S > > > > 2.Dynamic hsq_depth > > 1) Sequential write: > > Speed: 167 166 166 > > Average speed: 166.33MB/S > > > > 2) Sequential read: > > Speed: 327 326 326 > > Average speed: 326.3MB/S > > > > 3) Random write: > > Speed: 86.1 86.2 87.7 > > Average speed: 86.67MB/S > > > > 4) Random read: > > Speed: 48.1 48 48 > > Average speed: 48.03MB/S > > > > Based on the above data, dynamic hsq_depth can improve the performance of random writes. > > Random write improved by 4.6%. > > Thanks for sharing this, interesting! > > > > > Test cmd > > ========= > > 1)write: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=write -bs=512K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64 > > 2)read: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=read -bs=512K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64 > > 3)randwrite: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randwrite -bs=4K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64 > > 4)randread: fio -filename=/dev/mmcblk0p72 -direct=1 -rw=randread -bs=4K -size=512M -group_reporting -name=test -numjobs=8 -thread -iodepth=64 > > > > The buffer you used for randwrite/randread is 4K blocks. Did you try > with something bigger too? > Hi Uffe I tried bs=8k and bs=16k, the random read and random write performance improvement was not noticeable. 1.Fixed hsq_depth 1) Random write(bs=8K): Speed: 116 114 115 Average speed: 115MB/S 2) Random read(bs=8K): Speed: 83 83 82.5 Average speed: 82.8MB/S 3) Random write(bs=16K): Speed: 141 142 141 Average speed: 141.3MB/S 4) Random read(bs=16K): Speed: 132 132 132 Average speed: 132MB/S 2.Dynamic hsq_depth 1) Random write(bs=8K): Speed: 115 115 115 Average speed: 115MB/S 2) Random read(bs=8K): Speed: 82.7 82.9 82.8 Average speed: 82.8MB/S 3) Random write(bs=16K): Speed: 143 141 141 Average speed: 141.6MB/S 4) Random read(bs=16K): Speed: 132 132 132 Average speed: 132MB/S > Or maybe we are afraid of introducing a bigger latency if we > dynamically change the hsq_depth to match something bigger than 4K? > Increasing hsq_depth cannot improve 8k and 16k random read/write performance. To reduce latency, we dynamically increase hsq_depth only for 4k random writes. > > > > Wenchao Chen (2): > > mmc: queue: replace immediate with hsq->depth > > mmc: hsq: dynamic adjustment of hsq->depth > > > > drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 6 +----- > > drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h | 8 ++++++++ > > include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + > > 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > Kind regards > Uffe