mbox series

[v2,0/2] AM57x EVM Device Tree Overlays

Message ID 20221101221110.17885-1-afd@ti.com
Headers show
Series AM57x EVM Device Tree Overlays | expand

Message

Andrew Davis Nov. 1, 2022, 10:11 p.m. UTC 
Hello all,

These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
wanted to test the water with this one.

For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
so double checks here very welcome.

Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html

Thanks,
Andrew

Changes from v1:
 - Made touchscreen node name generic
 - Used proper interrupt flags

Andrew Davis (2):
  ARM: dts: ti: Add AM57xx GP EVM board support
  ARM: dts: ti: Add AM57xx GP EVM Rev A3 board support

 arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile        |   4 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-evm.dtso | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/am57xx-evm.dtso

Comments

Tony Lindgren Nov. 9, 2022, 8:31 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hi Andrew & Rob,

* Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]:
> Hello all,
> 
> These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
> TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
> wanted to test the water with this one.
> 
> For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
> will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
> it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
> so double checks here very welcome.
> 
> Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html

Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
into dt/next") in Linux next.

Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?

Regards,

Tony
Andrew Davis Nov. 9, 2022, 6:40 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi Andrew & Rob,
> 
> * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
>> TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
>> wanted to test the water with this one.
>>
>> For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
>> will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
>> it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
>> so double checks here very welcome.
>>
>> Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html
> 
> Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
> into dt/next") in Linux next.
> 
> Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?
> 

26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the
commit message. This series works on top of either.

Thanks,
Andrew

> Regards,
> 
> Tony
Tony Lindgren Nov. 10, 2022, 7:12 a.m. UTC | #3 
* Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221109 18:31]:
> On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi Andrew & Rob,
> > 
> > * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]:
> > > Hello all,
> > > 
> > > These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
> > > TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
> > > wanted to test the water with this one.
> > > 
> > > For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
> > > will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
> > > it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
> > > so double checks here very welcome.
> > > 
> > > Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html
> > 
> > Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
> > into dt/next") in Linux next.
> > 
> > Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?
> > 
> 
> 26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the
> commit message. This series works on top of either.

Rob, are those commits immutable and OK to use as a base?

Regards,

Tony
Tony Lindgren Jan. 19, 2023, 8:22 a.m. UTC | #4 
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [221110 07:05]:
> * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221109 18:31]:
> > On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew & Rob,
> > > 
> > > * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > > 
> > > > These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the
> > > > TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but
> > > > wanted to test the water with this one.
> > > > 
> > > > For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this
> > > > will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran
> > > > it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it,
> > > > so double checks here very welcome.
> > > > 
> > > > Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html
> > > 
> > > Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename'
> > > into dt/next") in Linux next.
> > > 
> > > Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above?
> > > 
> > 
> > 26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the
> > commit message. This series works on top of either.
> 
> Rob, are those commits immutable and OK to use as a base?

Andrew, I'm untagging these from my inbox, please resend when suitable.

Regards,

Tony