Message ID | 20220613124327.30766-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Thermal cpufreq & devfreq cooling minor clean-ups | expand |
On 6/14/22 19:26, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 14/06/2022 14:51, Lukasz Luba wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> >> On 6/13/22 13:43, Lukasz Luba wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This is v2 of some minor clean-ups for the thermal cpufreq and devfreq >>> cooling code. >>> >>> Changes: >>> v2: >>> - extened the cpufreq_cooling_device with private ops field, to not >>> waste >>> memory and simplify allocation/free code (Viresh) >>> - added devfreq_cooling clean-up to align with cpufreq cooling code >>> - added ACKs from Viresh for patch 2/4 and path 3/4 >>> - added missing maintainers of tracing to CC list >>> >>> Regards, >>> Lukasz >>> >>> Lukasz Luba (4): >>> thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Use private callback ops for each cooling >>> device >>> thermal: cpufreq_cooling : Refactor thermal_power_cpu_get_power >>> tracing >>> thermal: cpufreq_cooling: Update outdated comments >>> thermal: devfreq_cooling: Extend the devfreq_cooling_device with ops >>> >>> drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 77 ++++++++++--------------------- >>> drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling.c | 27 ++++------- >>> include/trace/events/thermal.h | 28 ++++------- >>> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Could you have a look and take the patches into your tree, please? >> The 3 of 4 patches got ACKs, the last one is devfreq cooling, which >> is pretty minor change. > > Applied, thanks > > Thanks Daniel!