Message ID | 20230207051105.11575-14-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | sched: Introduce classes of tasks for load balance | expand |
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:02 AM Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > The scheduler reads the IPCC scores when balancing load. These reads can > be quite frequent. Hardware can also update the HFI table frequently. > Concurrent access may cause a lot of lock contention. It gets worse as the > number of CPUs increases. > > Instead, create separate per-CPU IPCC scores that the scheduler can read > without the HFI table lock. > > Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> > Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> > Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> > Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> > Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com> > Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> > --- > Changes since v2: > * Only create these per-CPU variables when Intel Thread Director is > supported. > > Changes since v1: > * Added this patch. > --- > drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > index 2527ae3836c7..b06021828892 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/math.h> > #include <linux/mutex.h> > +#include <linux/percpu.h> > #include <linux/percpu-defs.h> > #include <linux/printk.h> > #include <linux/processor.h> > @@ -170,6 +171,43 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *hfi_updates_wq; > #define HFI_UPDATE_INTERVAL HZ > #define HFI_MAX_THERM_NOTIFY_COUNT 16 > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES It would be good to provide a (concise) description of this variable. > +static int __percpu *hfi_ipcc_scores; > + > +static int alloc_hfi_ipcc_scores(void) > +{ > + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ITD)) > + return 0; > + > + hfi_ipcc_scores = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(*hfi_ipcc_scores) * > + hfi_features.nr_classes, > + sizeof(*hfi_ipcc_scores)); > + > + return !hfi_ipcc_scores; I would do if (!hfi_ipcc_scores) return -ENOMEM; return 0; Or make the function return bool. > +} > + > +static void set_hfi_ipcc_score(void *caps, int cpu) > +{ > + int i, *hfi_class; > + > + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ITD)) > + return; > + > + hfi_class = per_cpu_ptr(hfi_ipcc_scores, cpu); > + > + for (i = 0; i < hfi_features.nr_classes; i++) { > + struct hfi_cpu_data *class_caps; > + > + class_caps = caps + i * hfi_features.class_stride; > + WRITE_ONCE(hfi_class[i], class_caps->perf_cap); As it stands, it is unclear why WRITE_ONCE() is needed here. > + } > +} > + > +#else > +static int alloc_hfi_ipcc_scores(void) { return 0; } > +static void set_hfi_ipcc_score(void *caps, int cpu) { } > +#endif /* CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES */ > + > static void get_hfi_caps(struct hfi_instance *hfi_instance, > struct thermal_genl_cpu_caps *cpu_caps) > { > @@ -192,6 +230,8 @@ static void get_hfi_caps(struct hfi_instance *hfi_instance, > cpu_caps[i].efficiency = caps->ee_cap << 2; > > ++i; > + > + set_hfi_ipcc_score(caps, cpu); > } > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&hfi_instance->table_lock); > } > @@ -580,8 +620,14 @@ void __init intel_hfi_init(void) > if (!hfi_updates_wq) > goto err_nomem; > > + if (alloc_hfi_ipcc_scores()) > + goto err_ipcc; > + > return; > > +err_ipcc: > + destroy_workqueue(hfi_updates_wq); > + > err_nomem: > for (j = 0; j < i; ++j) { > hfi_instance = &hfi_instances[j]; > --
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 06:37:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:02 AM Ricardo Neri > <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > The scheduler reads the IPCC scores when balancing load. These reads can > > be quite frequent. Hardware can also update the HFI table frequently. > > Concurrent access may cause a lot of lock contention. It gets worse as the > > number of CPUs increases. > > > > Instead, create separate per-CPU IPCC scores that the scheduler can read > > without the HFI table lock. > > > > Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> > > Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> > > Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> > > Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> > > Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> > > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > > Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com> > > Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> > > Cc: x86@kernel.org > > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > Changes since v2: > > * Only create these per-CPU variables when Intel Thread Director is > > supported. > > > > Changes since v1: > > * Added this patch. > > --- > > drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > > index 2527ae3836c7..b06021828892 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > > #include <linux/math.h> > > #include <linux/mutex.h> > > +#include <linux/percpu.h> > > #include <linux/percpu-defs.h> > > #include <linux/printk.h> > > #include <linux/processor.h> > > @@ -170,6 +171,43 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *hfi_updates_wq; > > #define HFI_UPDATE_INTERVAL HZ > > #define HFI_MAX_THERM_NOTIFY_COUNT 16 > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES > > It would be good to provide a (concise) description of this variable. > > > +static int __percpu *hfi_ipcc_scores; Do you mean hfi_ipcc_scores or CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES? > > + > > +static int alloc_hfi_ipcc_scores(void) > > +{ > > + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ITD)) > > + return 0; > > + > > + hfi_ipcc_scores = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(*hfi_ipcc_scores) * > > + hfi_features.nr_classes, > > + sizeof(*hfi_ipcc_scores)); > > + > > + return !hfi_ipcc_scores; > > I would do > > if (!hfi_ipcc_scores) > return -ENOMEM; > > return 0; > > Or make the function return bool. Sure, I can make this function return -ENOMEM. > > > +} > > + > > +static void set_hfi_ipcc_score(void *caps, int cpu) > > +{ > > + int i, *hfi_class; > > + > > + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ITD)) > > + return; > > + > > + hfi_class = per_cpu_ptr(hfi_ipcc_scores, cpu); > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < hfi_features.nr_classes; i++) { > > + struct hfi_cpu_data *class_caps; > > + > > + class_caps = caps + i * hfi_features.class_stride; > > + WRITE_ONCE(hfi_class[i], class_caps->perf_cap); > > As it stands, it is unclear why WRITE_ONCE() is needed here. The CPU handling the HFI interrupt will update all the per-CPU IPCC scores. My intention is to ensure that a WRITE of a given IPCC score is completed before another CPU READs an IPCC score. The corresponding READ_ONCE happens in patch 15.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 1:32 AM Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 06:37:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:02 AM Ricardo Neri > > <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > The scheduler reads the IPCC scores when balancing load. These reads can > > > be quite frequent. Hardware can also update the HFI table frequently. > > > Concurrent access may cause a lot of lock contention. It gets worse as the > > > number of CPUs increases. > > > > > > Instead, create separate per-CPU IPCC scores that the scheduler can read > > > without the HFI table lock. > > > > > > Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> > > > Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> > > > Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> > > > Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> > > > Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> > > > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > > > Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > > > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> > > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> > > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com> > > > Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> > > > Cc: x86@kernel.org > > > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> > > > --- > > > Changes since v2: > > > * Only create these per-CPU variables when Intel Thread Director is > > > supported. > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > * Added this patch. > > > --- > > > drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > > > index 2527ae3836c7..b06021828892 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > > > #include <linux/math.h> > > > #include <linux/mutex.h> > > > +#include <linux/percpu.h> > > > #include <linux/percpu-defs.h> > > > #include <linux/printk.h> > > > #include <linux/processor.h> > > > @@ -170,6 +171,43 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *hfi_updates_wq; > > > #define HFI_UPDATE_INTERVAL HZ > > > #define HFI_MAX_THERM_NOTIFY_COUNT 16 > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES > > > > It would be good to provide a (concise) description of this variable. > > > > > +static int __percpu *hfi_ipcc_scores; > > Do you mean hfi_ipcc_scores or CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES? hfi_ipcc_scores (as the latter is not a variable).
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:08:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 1:32 AM Ricardo Neri > <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 06:37:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:02 AM Ricardo Neri > > > <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > The scheduler reads the IPCC scores when balancing load. These reads can > > > > be quite frequent. Hardware can also update the HFI table frequently. > > > > Concurrent access may cause a lot of lock contention. It gets worse as the > > > > number of CPUs increases. > > > > > > > > Instead, create separate per-CPU IPCC scores that the scheduler can read > > > > without the HFI table lock. > > > > > > > > Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> > > > > Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> > > > > Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> > > > > Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> > > > > Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> > > > > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > > > > Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > > > > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> > > > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> > > > > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > > Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com> > > > > Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> > > > > Cc: x86@kernel.org > > > > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > > > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > Changes since v2: > > > > * Only create these per-CPU variables when Intel Thread Director is > > > > supported. > > > > > > > > Changes since v1: > > > > * Added this patch. > > > > --- > > > > drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > > > > index 2527ae3836c7..b06021828892 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c > > > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > > > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > > > > #include <linux/math.h> > > > > #include <linux/mutex.h> > > > > +#include <linux/percpu.h> > > > > #include <linux/percpu-defs.h> > > > > #include <linux/printk.h> > > > > #include <linux/processor.h> > > > > @@ -170,6 +171,43 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *hfi_updates_wq; > > > > #define HFI_UPDATE_INTERVAL HZ > > > > #define HFI_MAX_THERM_NOTIFY_COUNT 16 > > > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES > > > > > > It would be good to provide a (concise) description of this variable. > > > > > > > +static int __percpu *hfi_ipcc_scores; > > > > Do you mean hfi_ipcc_scores or CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES? > > hfi_ipcc_scores (as the latter is not a variable). I thought so. Thank you for clarifying.
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c index 2527ae3836c7..b06021828892 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/math.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/percpu.h> #include <linux/percpu-defs.h> #include <linux/printk.h> #include <linux/processor.h> @@ -170,6 +171,43 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *hfi_updates_wq; #define HFI_UPDATE_INTERVAL HZ #define HFI_MAX_THERM_NOTIFY_COUNT 16 +#ifdef CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES +static int __percpu *hfi_ipcc_scores; + +static int alloc_hfi_ipcc_scores(void) +{ + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ITD)) + return 0; + + hfi_ipcc_scores = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(*hfi_ipcc_scores) * + hfi_features.nr_classes, + sizeof(*hfi_ipcc_scores)); + + return !hfi_ipcc_scores; +} + +static void set_hfi_ipcc_score(void *caps, int cpu) +{ + int i, *hfi_class; + + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_ITD)) + return; + + hfi_class = per_cpu_ptr(hfi_ipcc_scores, cpu); + + for (i = 0; i < hfi_features.nr_classes; i++) { + struct hfi_cpu_data *class_caps; + + class_caps = caps + i * hfi_features.class_stride; + WRITE_ONCE(hfi_class[i], class_caps->perf_cap); + } +} + +#else +static int alloc_hfi_ipcc_scores(void) { return 0; } +static void set_hfi_ipcc_score(void *caps, int cpu) { } +#endif /* CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES */ + static void get_hfi_caps(struct hfi_instance *hfi_instance, struct thermal_genl_cpu_caps *cpu_caps) { @@ -192,6 +230,8 @@ static void get_hfi_caps(struct hfi_instance *hfi_instance, cpu_caps[i].efficiency = caps->ee_cap << 2; ++i; + + set_hfi_ipcc_score(caps, cpu); } raw_spin_unlock_irq(&hfi_instance->table_lock); } @@ -580,8 +620,14 @@ void __init intel_hfi_init(void) if (!hfi_updates_wq) goto err_nomem; + if (alloc_hfi_ipcc_scores()) + goto err_ipcc; + return; +err_ipcc: + destroy_workqueue(hfi_updates_wq); + err_nomem: for (j = 0; j < i; ++j) { hfi_instance = &hfi_instances[j];
The scheduler reads the IPCC scores when balancing load. These reads can be quite frequent. Hardware can also update the HFI table frequently. Concurrent access may cause a lot of lock contention. It gets worse as the number of CPUs increases. Instead, create separate per-CPU IPCC scores that the scheduler can read without the HFI table lock. Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> --- Changes since v2: * Only create these per-CPU variables when Intel Thread Director is supported. Changes since v1: * Added this patch. --- drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)