mbox series

[RT,0/3] Linux v4.14.320-rt152-rc1

Message ID 20230808163520.305842-1-lgoncalv@redhat.com
Headers show
Series Linux v4.14.320-rt152-rc1 | expand

Message

Luis Claudio R. Goncalves Aug. 8, 2023, 4:35 p.m. UTC 
Dear RT Folks,

This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 4.14.320-rt152-rc1.

Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches
too.

The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted
when the final release is out. This is just a review release (or
release candidate).

The pre-releases will not be pushed to the git repository, only the
final release is.

If all goes well, this patch will be converted to the next main
release on 2023-08-15.

To build 4.14.320-rt152-rc1 directly, the following patches should be applied:

  https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/linux-4.14.tar.xz

  https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/patch-4.14.320.xz

  https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.14/older/patch-4.14.320-rt152-rc1.patch.xz

Signing key fingerprint:

  9354 0649 9972 8D31 D464  D140 F394 A423 F8E6 7C26

All keys used for the above files and repositories can be found on the
following git repository:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/kernel/pgpkeys.git

Enjoy!
Luis

Changes from v4.14.320-rt151:


Clark Williams (1):
  rt: PREEMPT_RT safety net for backported patches

Luis Claudio R. Goncalves (2):
  rt: timers: use CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL instead of CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
  Linux 4.14.320-rt152-rc1

 kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 4 ++++
 kernel/time/timer.c    | 4 ++--
 localversion-rt        | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Aug. 9, 2023, 2:10 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 2023-08-09 10:50:59 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:17:38AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Looks good, just a nitpick: If you add 2/3 you don't need 1/3.
> 
> Agreed. I just kept 1/3 because I wanted to both give credit to André Pribil
> for reporting the problem and also highlight the symptom he observed.
> Should I add that as a note on 2/3 and drop the first patch?

Sure. Instead of fixing that one incident (and there were of few of
those as far as I remember) it is more future proof to do what Steven
suggested.

> Thanks for reviewing the RC!
> Luis

Sebastian