From patchwork Fri Jul 28 07:02:51 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ping-Ke Shih X-Patchwork-Id: 707939 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314A5EB64DD for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 07:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233640AbjG1HDp (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 03:03:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38672 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233647AbjG1HDn (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 03:03:43 -0400 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D062118 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.77 with qID 36S73MVl8031409, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36506.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.27]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.81/5.90) with ESMTPS id 36S73MVl8031409 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:03:22 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXH36506.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.17; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:03:35 +0800 Received: from [127.0.1.1] (172.21.69.188) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.7; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:03:34 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: CC: , Subject: [PATCH 09/10] wifi: rtw89: add to display hardware rates v1 histogram in debugfs Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:02:51 +0800 Message-ID: <20230728070252.66525-10-pkshih@realtek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20230728070252.66525-1-pkshih@realtek.com> References: <20230728070252.66525-1-pkshih@realtek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [172.21.69.188] X-ClientProxiedBy: RTEXMBS02.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.95) To RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: fallback X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: fallback X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: fallback Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org The upcoming WiFi 7 chips support EHT rates, and hardware rate codes are changed too, so modify to adapt the changes. (EHT counters are still zeros in below example) RX count: Legacy: [0, 0, 0, 0] OFDM: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] HT 0: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] HT 1: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] VHT 1SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0][0, 0] VHT 2SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0][0, 0] HE 1SS: [0, 0, 42, 0, 43, 90, 75, 0, 26, 20, 260, 7] HE 2SS: [0, 96, 232, 84, 125, 184, 52, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] EHT 1SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0][0, 0] EHT 2SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 1 + drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c | 35 +++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h index 24c1097467885..f3f7abddd3c0b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h @@ -584,6 +584,7 @@ enum rtw89_hw_rate { RTW89_HW_RATE_V1_EHT_NSS4_MCS13 = 0x46D, RTW89_HW_RATE_NR, + RTW89_HW_RATE_INVAL, RTW89_HW_RATE_MASK_MOD = GENMASK(8, 7), RTW89_HW_RATE_MASK_VAL = GENMASK(6, 0), diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c index ce5a9ac081457..f67af8aa2358f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c @@ -3325,20 +3325,26 @@ rtw89_debug_append_rx_rate(struct seq_file *m, struct rtw89_pkt_stat *pkt_stat, pkt_stat->rx_rate_cnt[first_rate + i]); } +#define FIRST_RATE_SAME(rate) {RTW89_HW_RATE_ ## rate, RTW89_HW_RATE_ ## rate} +#define FIRST_RATE_ENUM(rate) {RTW89_HW_RATE_ ## rate, RTW89_HW_RATE_V1_ ## rate} +#define FIRST_RATE_GEV1(rate) {RTW89_HW_RATE_INVAL, RTW89_HW_RATE_V1_ ## rate} + static const struct rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_info { - enum rtw89_hw_rate first_rate; + enum rtw89_hw_rate first_rate[RTW89_CHIP_GEN_NUM]; int len; int ext; const char *rate_mode; } rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_infos[] = { - {RTW89_HW_RATE_CCK1, 4, 0, "Legacy:"}, - {RTW89_HW_RATE_OFDM6, 8, 0, "OFDM:"}, - {RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS0, 8, 0, "HT 0:"}, - {RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS8, 8, 0, "HT 1:"}, - {RTW89_HW_RATE_VHT_NSS1_MCS0, 10, 2, "VHT 1SS:"}, - {RTW89_HW_RATE_VHT_NSS2_MCS0, 10, 2, "VHT 2SS:"}, - {RTW89_HW_RATE_HE_NSS1_MCS0, 12, 0, "HE 1SS:"}, - {RTW89_HW_RATE_HE_NSS2_MCS0, 12, 0, "HE 2ss:"}, + {FIRST_RATE_SAME(CCK1), 4, 0, "Legacy:"}, + {FIRST_RATE_SAME(OFDM6), 8, 0, "OFDM:"}, + {FIRST_RATE_ENUM(MCS0), 8, 0, "HT 0:"}, + {FIRST_RATE_ENUM(MCS8), 8, 0, "HT 1:"}, + {FIRST_RATE_ENUM(VHT_NSS1_MCS0), 10, 2, "VHT 1SS:"}, + {FIRST_RATE_ENUM(VHT_NSS2_MCS0), 10, 2, "VHT 2SS:"}, + {FIRST_RATE_ENUM(HE_NSS1_MCS0), 12, 0, "HE 1SS:"}, + {FIRST_RATE_ENUM(HE_NSS2_MCS0), 12, 0, "HE 2SS:"}, + {FIRST_RATE_GEV1(EHT_NSS1_MCS0), 14, 2, "EHT 1SS:"}, + {FIRST_RATE_GEV1(EHT_NSS2_MCS0), 14, 0, "EHT 2SS:"}, }; static int rtw89_debug_priv_phy_info_get(struct seq_file *m, void *v) @@ -3347,7 +3353,9 @@ static int rtw89_debug_priv_phy_info_get(struct seq_file *m, void *v) struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = debugfs_priv->rtwdev; struct rtw89_traffic_stats *stats = &rtwdev->stats; struct rtw89_pkt_stat *pkt_stat = &rtwdev->phystat.last_pkt_stat; + const struct rtw89_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip; const struct rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_info *info; + enum rtw89_hw_rate first_rate; int i; seq_printf(m, "TP TX: %u [%u] Mbps (lv: %d), RX: %u [%u] Mbps (lv: %d)\n", @@ -3359,15 +3367,20 @@ static int rtw89_debug_priv_phy_info_get(struct seq_file *m, void *v) stats->rx_avg_len); seq_puts(m, "RX count:\n"); + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_infos); i++) { info = &rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_infos[i]; + first_rate = info->first_rate[chip->chip_gen]; + if (first_rate >= RTW89_HW_RATE_NR) + continue; + seq_printf(m, "%10s [", info->rate_mode); rtw89_debug_append_rx_rate(m, pkt_stat, - info->first_rate, info->len); + first_rate, info->len); if (info->ext) { seq_puts(m, "]["); rtw89_debug_append_rx_rate(m, pkt_stat, - info->first_rate + info->len, info->ext); + first_rate + info->len, info->ext); } seq_puts(m, "]\n"); }