From patchwork Tue Dec 19 06:57:35 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Su Hui X-Patchwork-Id: 756884 Received: from mail.nfschina.com (unknown [42.101.60.195]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5F4BF9E8; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 06:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nfschina.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nfschina.com Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [180.167.10.98]) by mail.nfschina.com (Maildata Gateway V2.8.8) with ESMTPSA id 2610F60F259C0; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:58:02 +0800 (CST) X-MD-Sfrom: suhui@nfschina.com X-MD-SrcIP: 180.167.10.98 From: Su Hui To: pkshih@realtek.com, kvalo@kernel.org Cc: Su Hui , linville@tuxdriver.com, chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH wireless-next 07/11] wifi: rtlwifi: rtl8192de: using calculate_bit_shift() Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:57:35 +0800 Message-Id: <20231219065739.1895666-8-suhui@nfschina.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20231219065739.1895666-1-suhui@nfschina.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Using calculate_bit_shift() to replace _rtl92d_phy_calculate_bit_shift(). And fix the undefined bitwise shift behavior problem. Fixes: 7274a8c22980 ("rtlwifi: rtl8192de: Merge phy routines") Signed-off-by: Su Hui --- .../net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/phy.c | 15 ++++----------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/phy.c index d18c092b6142..d835a27429f0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/phy.c @@ -169,13 +169,6 @@ static const u8 channel_all[59] = { 157, 159, 161, 163, 165 }; -static u32 _rtl92d_phy_calculate_bit_shift(u32 bitmask) -{ - u32 i = ffs(bitmask); - - return i ? i - 1 : 32; -} - u32 rtl92d_phy_query_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr, u32 bitmask) { struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw); @@ -198,7 +191,7 @@ u32 rtl92d_phy_query_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr, u32 bitmask) } else { originalvalue = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr); } - bitshift = _rtl92d_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask); + bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask); returnvalue = (originalvalue & bitmask) >> bitshift; rtl_dbg(rtlpriv, COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE, "BBR MASK=0x%x Addr[0x%x]=0x%x\n", @@ -230,7 +223,7 @@ void rtl92d_phy_set_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, dbi_direct); else originalvalue = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr); - bitshift = _rtl92d_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask); + bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask); data = ((originalvalue & (~bitmask)) | (data << bitshift)); } if (rtlhal->during_mac1init_radioa || rtlhal->during_mac0init_radiob) @@ -317,7 +310,7 @@ u32 rtl92d_phy_query_rf_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, regaddr, rfpath, bitmask); spin_lock(&rtlpriv->locks.rf_lock); original_value = _rtl92d_phy_rf_serial_read(hw, rfpath, regaddr); - bitshift = _rtl92d_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask); + bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask); readback_value = (original_value & bitmask) >> bitshift; spin_unlock(&rtlpriv->locks.rf_lock); rtl_dbg(rtlpriv, COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE, @@ -343,7 +336,7 @@ void rtl92d_phy_set_rf_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum radio_path rfpath, if (bitmask != RFREG_OFFSET_MASK) { original_value = _rtl92d_phy_rf_serial_read(hw, rfpath, regaddr); - bitshift = _rtl92d_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask); + bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask); data = ((original_value & (~bitmask)) | (data << bitshift)); }