Message ID | 20190312085935.11340-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | lock, bfq: fix bugs, reduce exec time and boost performance | expand |
> Il giorno 12 mar 2019, alle ore 09:59, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: > > Hi, > this is the v3 of the series > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/10/138 > that fixes some bug affecting performance, reduces execution time a > little bit, and boosts throughput and responsiveness. > > The difference w.r.t. v2 are new fixes to the patch "block, bfq: print > SHARED instead of pid for shared queues in logs", after patient checks > and suggestions by Holger and Oleksandr. > Hi Jens, have you had time to look into this? Thanks, Paolo > Thanks, > Paolo > > Francesco Pollicino (2): > block, bfq: print SHARED instead of pid for shared queues in logs > block, bfq: save & resume weight on a queue merge/split > > Paolo Valente (7): > block, bfq: increase idling for weight-raised queues > block, bfq: do not idle for lowest-weight queues > block, bfq: tune service injection basing on request service times > block, bfq: do not merge queues on flash storage with queueing > block, bfq: do not tag totally seeky queues as soft rt > block, bfq: always protect newly-created queues from existing active > queues > doc, block, bfq: add information on bfq execution time > > Documentation/block/bfq-iosched.txt | 29 +- > block/bfq-cgroup.c | 3 +- > block/bfq-iosched.c | 786 +++++++++++++++++++++++----- > block/bfq-iosched.h | 92 ++-- > block/bfq-wf2q.c | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 729 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1
On 3/26/19 5:53 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: > > >> Il giorno 12 mar 2019, alle ore 09:59, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> ha scritto: >> >> Hi, >> this is the v3 of the series >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/10/138 >> that fixes some bug affecting performance, reduces execution time a >> little bit, and boosts throughput and responsiveness. >> >> The difference w.r.t. v2 are new fixes to the patch "block, bfq: print >> SHARED instead of pid for shared queues in logs", after patient checks >> and suggestions by Holger and Oleksandr. >> > > Hi Jens, > have you had time to look into this? Looks ok to me, I'll queue it up for 5.2. -- Jens Axboe