From patchwork Mon Aug 8 09:18:10 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Leizhen \(ThunderTown\)" X-Patchwork-Id: 73410 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.29.52 with SMTP id a49csp3116047qga; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 02:20:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.67.7.170 with SMTP id dd10mr12181457pad.152.1470648019440; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 02:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g79si36115285pfb.219.2016.08.08.02.20.18; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 02:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752197AbcHHJUB (ORCPT + 27 others); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 05:20:01 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:40730 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751951AbcHHJT6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2016 05:19:58 -0400 Received: from 172.24.1.36 (EHLO szxeml431-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.36]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DLK64673; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:19:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.177.23.164) by szxeml431-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:19:41 +0800 From: Zhen Lei To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , Rob Herring , "Frank Rowand" , devicetree CC: Zefan Li , Xinwei Hu , "Tianhong Ding" , Hanjun Guo , Zhen Lei Subject: [PATCH v5 05/14] arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:18:10 +0800 Message-ID: <1470647899-6324-6-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.5.msysgit.1 In-Reply-To: <1470647899-6324-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> References: <1470647899-6324-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.177.23.164] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.57A84EBB.007E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 956b35d1aa6aac4bd8ff618a470f83f2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org numa_init(of_numa_init) may returned error because of numa configuration error. So "No NUMA configuration found" is inaccurate. In fact, specific configuration error information should be immediately printed by the testing branch. Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei --- arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.5.0 diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c index 2601660..1b9622c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c @@ -338,8 +338,10 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void)) if (ret < 0) return ret; - if (nodes_empty(numa_nodes_parsed)) + if (nodes_empty(numa_nodes_parsed)) { + pr_info("No NUMA configuration found\n"); return -EINVAL; + } ret = numa_register_nodes(); if (ret < 0) @@ -370,8 +372,6 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void) if (numa_off) pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */ - else - pr_info("No NUMA configuration found\n"); pr_info("NUMA: Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", 0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);