@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ struct nf_conn {
struct hlist_node nat_bysource;
#endif
/* all members below initialized via memset */
- u8 __nfct_init_offset[0];
+ struct { } __nfct_init_offset;
/* If we were expected by an expectation, this will be it */
struct nf_conn *master;
@@ -1519,9 +1519,9 @@ __nf_conntrack_alloc(struct net *net,
ct->status = 0;
ct->timeout = 0;
write_pnet(&ct->ct_net, net);
- memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset[0], 0,
+ memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset, 0,
offsetof(struct nf_conn, proto) -
- offsetof(struct nf_conn, __nfct_init_offset[0]));
+ offsetof(struct nf_conn, __nfct_init_offset));
nf_ct_zone_add(ct, zone);
gcc-10 warns around a suspicious access to an empty struct member: net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c: In function '__nf_conntrack_alloc': net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1522:9: warning: array subscript 0 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'u8[0]' {aka 'unsigned char[0]'} [-Wzero-length-bounds] 1522 | memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset[0], 0, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:37: include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:90:5: note: while referencing '__nfct_init_offset' 90 | u8 __nfct_init_offset[0]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The code is correct but a bit unusual. Rework it slightly in a way that does not trigger the warning, using an empty struct instead of an empty array. There are probably more elegant ways to do this, but this is the smallest change. Fixes: c41884ce0562 ("netfilter: conntrack: avoid zeroing timer") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h | 2 +- net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)