From patchwork Fri Sep 25 04:42:56 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Herbert Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 260235 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B901EC4727F for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 04:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F53721D7F for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 04:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727052AbgIYEnR (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:43:17 -0400 Received: from helcar.hmeau.com ([216.24.177.18]:52492 "EHLO fornost.hmeau.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726738AbgIYEnR (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:43:17 -0400 Received: from gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.0.7]) by fornost.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.92 #5 (Debian)) id 1kLfZQ-0003Uw-Ce; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:42:57 +1000 Received: by gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:42:56 +1000 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:42:56 +1000 From: Herbert Xu To: syzbot Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@secunet.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: Use correct address family in xfrm_state_find Message-ID: <20200925044256.GA18246@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <0000000000009fc91605afd40d89@google.com> <20200925030759.GA17939@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200925030759.GA17939@gondor.apana.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Resend with proper subject. ---8<--- The struct flowi must never be interpreted by itself as its size depends on the address family. Therefore it must always be grouped with its original family value. In this particular instance, the original family value is lost in the function xfrm_state_find. Therefore we get a bogus read when it's coupled with the wrong family which would occur with inter- family xfrm states. This patch fixes it by keeping the original family value. Note that the same bug could potentially occur in LSM through the xfrm_state_pol_flow_match hook. I checked the current code there and it seems to be safe for now as only secid is used which is part of struct flowi_common. But that API should be changed so that so that we don't get new bugs in the future. We could do that by replacing fl with just secid or adding a family field. Reported-by: syzbot+577fbac3145a6eb2e7a5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 48b8d78315bf ("[XFRM]: State selection update to use inner...") Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c index 69520ad3d83b..9b5f2c2b9770 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c @@ -1019,7 +1019,8 @@ static void xfrm_state_look_at(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct xfrm_state *x, */ if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_VALID) { if ((x->sel.family && - !xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, x->sel.family)) || + (x->sel.family != family || + !xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, family))) || !security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl)) return; @@ -1032,7 +1033,9 @@ static void xfrm_state_look_at(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct xfrm_state *x, *acq_in_progress = 1; } else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ERROR || x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_EXPIRED) { - if (xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, x->sel.family) && + if ((!x->sel.family || + (x->sel.family == family && + xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, family))) && security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl)) *error = -ESRCH; } @@ -1072,7 +1075,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr, tmpl->mode == x->props.mode && tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto && (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi)) - xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, encap_family, + xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family, &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error); } if (best || acquire_in_progress) @@ -1089,7 +1092,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr, tmpl->mode == x->props.mode && tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto && (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi)) - xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, encap_family, + xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family, &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error); }