@@ -242,23 +242,15 @@ static int switchdev_port_obj_notify(enum switchdev_notifier_type nt,
return 0;
}
-static int switchdev_port_obj_add_now(struct net_device *dev,
- const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
-{
- ASSERT_RTNL();
-
- return switchdev_port_obj_notify(SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD,
- dev, obj, extack);
-}
-
static void switchdev_port_obj_add_deferred(struct net_device *dev,
const void *data)
{
const struct switchdev_obj *obj = data;
int err;
- err = switchdev_port_obj_add_now(dev, obj, NULL);
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+ err = switchdev_port_obj_notify(SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD,
+ dev, obj, NULL);
if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
netdev_err(dev, "failed (err=%d) to add object (id=%d)\n",
err, obj->id);
@@ -290,7 +282,8 @@ int switchdev_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
if (obj->flags & SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER)
return switchdev_port_obj_add_defer(dev, obj);
ASSERT_RTNL();
- return switchdev_port_obj_add_now(dev, obj, extack);
+ return switchdev_port_obj_notify(SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD,
+ dev, obj, extack);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(switchdev_port_obj_add);
After the removal of the transactional model inside switchdev_port_obj_add_now, it has no added value and we can just call switchdev_port_obj_notify directly, bypassing this function. Let's delete it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> --- net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 17 +++++------------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)