From patchwork Fri May 28 12:41:51 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Krzysztof Kozlowski X-Patchwork-Id: 449893 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D4DC4708E for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF83613E9 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236196AbhE1Mnz (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2021 08:43:55 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:42500 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235491AbhE1Mns (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2021 08:43:48 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com ([209.85.222.71]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lmbob-0007xn-4D for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:42:13 +0000 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id c27-20020ab0079b0000b0290217cf59726cso1849418uaf.10 for ; Fri, 28 May 2021 05:42:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5rn4epAcNH1Mik4gARYYfuC/XhUWwqVwYBKCtmf4Gqs=; b=N+V9Wwq9+HFBJJ0VU+HbmDwkGSz/B6GEKKSE2/Vqww5qF7ELkZdpM7quVycAHCwb8f erjaotoV43M+2Ip2fthFOblv8cpxVcLP40lIcu8+PWSTAdkabejQ/M3LFvBOTcGq8M52 wbp286XSMkCgmbAkG8nqRVvqg9tdhf+Kp2jgNdhm6+wHzel/lb7DTi1pblF6vSg3Ugo+ c0V2LouIgKTKaqXtCHxw6Mudt8dKfPYeHuyycT4m3FuQJNLqYObZB4GVYAYaJWZ5JPen ULc5Pf7ir9k+lutaAjUS3/gAbVrI9bOUz6v/HSh4JKkZY/V9vRB1wTt8Ay5bcdzv4wGy xJrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303plJCWjWcSNhS7UUXccNSEZQkW9F4AjchHsB5RrMymk6TH1gL 5JrlkCJP7Q0VhhBsVA5FiitkMTBfwYtUapfOm6bUM0Ys2U9zErFjnzUL25DOcCOWhAZrzX4m4AU 3IjjZ+q2V0ML0mGZiwT/Jr8q6dPEKal2nZw== X-Received: by 2002:a67:f489:: with SMTP id o9mr6659008vsn.47.1622205731738; Fri, 28 May 2021 05:42:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7U4c+zsR2eMX8uGtXZTl5loFQdOdjHKdIFeosX2oE3JmTuGdnSEfaAP46EceGx8B3kXxW1A== X-Received: by 2002:a67:f489:: with SMTP id o9mr6658995vsn.47.1622205731595; Fri, 28 May 2021 05:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([45.237.48.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b35sm782328uae.20.2021.05.28.05.42.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 May 2021 05:42:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , linux-nfc@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 03/12] nfc: port100: correct kerneldoc for structure Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 08:41:51 -0400 Message-Id: <20210528124200.79655-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210528124200.79655-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> References: <20210528124200.79655-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org The port100_in_rf_setting structure does not contain valid kerneldoc docummentation, unlike the port100_tg_rf_setting structure. Correct the kerneldoc to fix W=1 warnings: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski --- drivers/nfc/port100.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c index 8e4d355dc3ae..4df926cc37d0 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct port100; typedef void (*port100_send_async_complete_t)(struct port100 *dev, void *arg, struct sk_buff *resp); -/** +/* * Setting sets structure for in_set_rf command * * @in_*_set_number: Represent the entry indexes in the port-100 RF Base Table. @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static const struct port100_in_rf_setting in_rf_settings[] = { }; /** - * Setting sets structure for tg_set_rf command + * struct port100_tg_rf_setting - Setting sets structure for tg_set_rf command * * @tg_set_number: Represents the entry index in the port-100 RF Base Table. * This table contains multiple RF setting sets required for RF