From patchwork Wed Sep 9 11:27:36 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= X-Patchwork-Id: 274143 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF4EC433E2 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0991820897 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="knS0pgnx" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0991820897 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:40668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFyMe-0001Cu-VF for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 07:34:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFyGd-0000IB-Gq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 07:27:59 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::441]:35078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFyGb-0006Xt-O0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 07:27:59 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id e16so2563080wrm.2 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 04:27:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0gAQyx4BUxAer/TPI6eyMofMbH+F+n5vgmbKXdm5rcc=; b=knS0pgnxnowVxpTrJvI34NE04fgEQFLk/FZ4V9wU3KKfHE+CKjmhBbRhF6IGNKW76G 23n7ND1mb8VMAWkxMd4mEFGF8SFkwavf9iISI5+0rN6DVXmyJBalPLrayfe4fk2qovvz TGsaZkC8nONs8pYxd5wxPJDz4VrNTtOlc2osJJXP31AyrBnhWqjO6mMCqvOOLBv5FKmM JKqDltUqPN65b7a98NsFfO+XgZpR9hERS7XoqOTa4aYfmSdVS/Y55q0+yAAQ7FJ8N5uN 0uGRrwuYPAWEGXz6gRYWiovoI+nYZVelK/JObZsYV0KE4uOJPxfCPpDaMgBPTpldWdhg QR/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0gAQyx4BUxAer/TPI6eyMofMbH+F+n5vgmbKXdm5rcc=; b=iotHuxZ4AcfWE1QKgHNRWjLiN2hksm0XqxDPtNRN0p94+CJ1W6aQJiewcLcSlwHeti Vv7lvdE73osvh9WIo9VjKseBQQF5NHjLZNurwaaY1rXyzFvbcDX3mEZEt9vV2adD5EWy pg+62vA5+A7hiT+Wo8taMbrXxy+KOdyQOT5bjdAviigy9fggxGXL4v+HM/Jxfnmw3Lvp BjP/DT6+GSndiJc9Oj804upBdznHfibk9+U34cqMRDLFQhi5EhCcgS4UpbMu7HIWqt8Q Mt/HfmwrDlcUBHZuZiyaqPNBhs8jextgx/3yq4zxJLRguBLkar2nEwQC1URhHXxdIHc6 Kjew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533pDyyUj+/4oTqp0nFEVVib2ZeddhmwTh+ZmHoIt/+NGGbHGQXd ajQPVbRWAFI6fM7Ny7ntsCLmpw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7eIhuRfxNQj2vqvws+oK+MInZQgoG75Id/OhtcwHHJKC7unR6ASZ2PwBWI0/ZSQEDpiGxmw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fb87:: with SMTP id a7mr3662835wrr.390.1599650876389; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 04:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q186sm3547348wma.45.2020.09.09.04.27.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 04:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800F31FF91; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:27:42 +0100 (BST) From: =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v2 05/10] docs/system/deprecated: mark ppc64abi32-linux-user for deprecation Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:27:36 +0100 Message-Id: <20200909112742.25730-6-alex.bennee@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200909112742.25730-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> References: <20200909112742.25730-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::441; envelope-from=alex.bennee@linaro.org; helo=mail-wr1-x441.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: fam@euphon.net, berrange@redhat.com, "reviewer:Incompatible changes" , =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= , richard.henderson@linaro.org, f4bug@amsat.org, cota@braap.org, aurelien@aurel32.net, David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" It's buggy and we are not sure anyone uses it. Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Acked-by: David Gibson --- docs/system/deprecated.rst | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/system/deprecated.rst b/docs/system/deprecated.rst index 851dbdeb8ab..a158e765c33 100644 --- a/docs/system/deprecated.rst +++ b/docs/system/deprecated.rst @@ -424,6 +424,13 @@ linux-user mode) is deprecated and will be removed in a future version of QEMU. Support for this CPU was removed from the upstream Linux kernel in 2018, and has also been dropped from glibc. +``ppc64abi32`` CPUs (since 5.2.0) +''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' + +The ``ppc64abi32`` architecture has a number of issues which regularly +trip up our CI testing and is suspected to be quite broken. For that +reason the maintainers strongly suspect no one actually uses it. + Related binaries ----------------