From patchwork Wed May 27 09:44:35 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 225177 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE83C433DF for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6745F2075A for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726291AbgE0JpQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2020 05:45:16 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:57540 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725939AbgE0JpP (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2020 05:45:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04R9bQaj129880; Wed, 27 May 2020 05:45:09 -0400 Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 316ywnnbk1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 May 2020 05:45:09 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04R9ZnqM021290; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:44:41 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 316uf8u3fk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 May 2020 09:44:40 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 04R9icZk48169074 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 May 2020 09:44:38 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344CC11C050; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:44:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D9D11C04C; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:44:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hbathini.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.102.0.137]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:44:36 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/fadump: account for memory_limit while reserving memory From: Hari Bathini To: Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev Cc: Sourabh Jain , Vasant Hegde , kbuild test robot , stable@vger.kernel.org, Mahesh J Salgaonkar Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 15:14:35 +0530 Message-ID: <159057266320.22331.6571453892066907320.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-dirty MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-05-27_03:2020-05-26,2020-05-27 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 cotscore=-2147483648 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2005270068 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org If the memory chunk found for reserving memory overshoots the memory limit imposed, do not proceed with reserving memory. Default behavior was this until commit 140777a3d8df ("powerpc/fadump: consider reserved ranges while reserving memory") changed it unwittingly. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Fixes: 140777a3d8df ("powerpc/fadump: consider reserved ranges while reserving memory") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- For reference: - https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2020-May/211136.html arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c index 63aac8b..78ab9a6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c @@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ int __init fadump_reserve_mem(void) */ base = fadump_locate_reserve_mem(base, size); - if (!base) { + if (!base || (base + size > mem_boundary)) { pr_err("Failed to find memory chunk for reservation!\n"); goto error_out; }