Message ID | 1340379312-6684-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > This commit removes the extraneous parentheses from rcu_assign_keypointer() > so that rcu_assign_pointer() can be wrapped in do-while. Should it be wrapped in a do-while itself then? And whilst you're at it, could you wrap PAYLOAD in parentheses? Thanks, David
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 05:04:36PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This commit removes the extraneous parentheses from rcu_assign_keypointer() > > so that rcu_assign_pointer() can be wrapped in do-while. > > Should it be wrapped in a do-while itself then? > > And whilst you're at it, could you wrap PAYLOAD in parentheses? Will do! Thanx, Paul
diff --git a/include/linux/key.h b/include/linux/key.h index 4cd22ed..6fafcf4 100644 --- a/include/linux/key.h +++ b/include/linux/key.h @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static inline bool key_is_instantiated(const struct key *key) rwsem_is_locked(&((struct key *)(KEY))->sem))) #define rcu_assign_keypointer(KEY, PAYLOAD) \ - (rcu_assign_pointer((KEY)->payload.rcudata, PAYLOAD)) + rcu_assign_pointer((KEY)->payload.rcudata, PAYLOAD) #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL extern ctl_table key_sysctls[];