| Message ID | 1409910393-30896-1-git-send-email-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:46:33PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > BUG_ON() in audit_syscall_entry() will be hit if user issues syscall(-1) > while syscall auditing is enabled (that is, by starting auditd). > In fact, syscall(-1) just fails (not signaled despite the expectation, > this is another minor bug), but the succeeding syscall hits BUG_ON. > > When auditing syscall(-1), audit_syscall_entry() is called anyway, but > audit_syscall_exit() is not called and then 'in_syscall' flag in thread's > audit context is kept on. In this way, audit_syscall_entry() against > the succeeding syscall will see BUG_ON(in_syscall). > > This patch fixes this bug by > 1) enforcing syscall exit tracing, including audit_syscall_exit(), to be > executed in all cases, Really, no. That adds additional overhead to every syscall, and that matters for system performance. We want to have as little as possible overhead here. The second issue here is that you haven't explained where the oops occurs. It's seen as a good practice to include the oops dump for the bug you're fixing in the commit changelog, so that others can see the starting point for the investigation, and see exactly where things are going wrong.
Russell, On 09/05/2014 06:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:46:33PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: >> BUG_ON() in audit_syscall_entry() will be hit if user issues syscall(-1) >> while syscall auditing is enabled (that is, by starting auditd). >> In fact, syscall(-1) just fails (not signaled despite the expectation, >> this is another minor bug), but the succeeding syscall hits BUG_ON. >> >> When auditing syscall(-1), audit_syscall_entry() is called anyway, but >> audit_syscall_exit() is not called and then 'in_syscall' flag in thread's >> audit context is kept on. In this way, audit_syscall_entry() against >> the succeeding syscall will see BUG_ON(in_syscall). >> >> This patch fixes this bug by >> 1) enforcing syscall exit tracing, including audit_syscall_exit(), to be >> executed in all cases, > > Really, no. That adds additional overhead to every syscall, and that > matters for system performance. We want to have as little as possible > overhead here. My words might have confused you, but this issue exists, in the current mainline kernel, not only against syscall(-1), but any invalid or pseudo syscalls. (And other archs seem to behave in the same way AFAIK.) But if you want, I can fix it. See my next version. -Takahiro AKASHI > The second issue here is that you haven't explained where the oops > occurs. It's seen as a good practice to include the oops dump for the > bug you're fixing in the commit changelog, so that others can see the > starting point for the investigation, and see exactly where things are > going wrong. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S index e52fe5a..28d3931 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S @@ -426,7 +426,6 @@ ENTRY(vector_swi) local_restart: ldr r10, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS] @ check for syscall tracing stmdb sp!, {r4, r5} @ push fifth and sixth args - tst r10, #_TIF_SYSCALL_WORK @ are we tracing syscalls? bne __sys_trace @@ -476,10 +475,11 @@ __sys_trace: cmp scno, #-1 @ skip the syscall? bne 2b add sp, sp, #S_OFF @ restore stack - b ret_slow_syscall + b __sys_trace_return_skipped __sys_trace_return: str r0, [sp, #S_R0 + S_OFF]! @ save returned r0 +__sys_trace_return_skipped: mov r0, sp bl syscall_trace_exit b ret_slow_syscall diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c index 0c27ed6..f3339c8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -928,9 +928,13 @@ static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, regs->ARM_ip = ip; } +extern int arm_syscall(int, struct pt_regs *); + asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno) { - current_thread_info()->syscall = scno; + int orig_scno; + + current_thread_info()->syscall = orig_scno = scno; /* Do the secure computing check first; failures should be fast. */ if (secure_computing(scno) == -1) @@ -947,6 +951,10 @@ asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno) audit_syscall_entry(AUDIT_ARCH_ARM, scno, regs->ARM_r0, regs->ARM_r1, regs->ARM_r2, regs->ARM_r3); + /* user-issued syscall of -1 */ + if (scno == -1 && orig_scno == -1) + arm_syscall(scno, regs); + return scno; }
BUG_ON() in audit_syscall_entry() will be hit if user issues syscall(-1) while syscall auditing is enabled (that is, by starting auditd). In fact, syscall(-1) just fails (not signaled despite the expectation, this is another minor bug), but the succeeding syscall hits BUG_ON. When auditing syscall(-1), audit_syscall_entry() is called anyway, but audit_syscall_exit() is not called and then 'in_syscall' flag in thread's audit context is kept on. In this way, audit_syscall_entry() against the succeeding syscall will see BUG_ON(in_syscall). This patch fixes this bug by 1) enforcing syscall exit tracing, including audit_syscall_exit(), to be executed in all cases, 2) handling user-issued syscall(-1) with arm_syscall(). Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S | 4 ++-- arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c | 10 +++++++++- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)