Message ID | 1449773931-7200-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 12/11/2015 10:05 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Yang Shi | 2015-12-10 10:58:51 [-0800]: > >> When running some ptrace single step tests on x86-32 machine, the below problem >> is triggered: >> >> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at linux-rt/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917 >> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1041, name: dummy2 >> INFO: lockdep is turned off. >> Preemption disabled at:[<c100326f>] do_debug+0x1f/0x1a0 >> >> CPU: 10 PID: 1041 Comm: dummy2 Tainted: G W 4.1.13-rt13 #1 >> Hardware name: Intel Corporation S5520HC/S5520HC, BIOS S5500.86B.01.10.0025.030220091519 03/02/2009 >> 00000000 00000000 e1811e80 c1aa8306 00000000 e1811ea8 c1080517 c1d8b2e8 >> c100326f c100326f 00000411 e5b7d5b4 e1d521c4 00000005 e1811f74 e1811ec4 >> c1ab0eff e1d51cc0 e5b7d180 c1081403 e5b7d180 e5b7d180 e1811ee4 c1064b5a >> Call Trace: >> [<c1aa8306>] dump_stack+0x46/0x5c >> [<c1080517>] ___might_sleep+0x137/0x220 >> [<c100326f>] ? do_debug+0x1f/0x1a0 >> [<c100326f>] ? do_debug+0x1f/0x1a0 >> [<c1ab0eff>] rt_spin_lock+0x1f/0x80 >> [<c1081403>] ? preempt_count_sub+0xb3/0x110 >> [<c1064b5a>] do_force_sig_info+0x2a/0xc0 >> [<c106567d>] force_sig_info+0xd/0x10 >> [<c1010cff>] send_sigtrap+0x6f/0x80 >> [<c10033b1>] do_debug+0x161/0x1a0 >> [<c1ab2921>] debug_stack_correct+0x2e/0x35 >> >> Signal send delay is just available for x86-64, x86-32 needs it too. > > This is new, this was not the case earlier. New means since v4.0-rc1 which Yes, it is. We didn't find this problem in earlier version kernel (I'd say 3.x). > is when 959274753857 ("x86, traps: Track entry into and exit from IST > context") got merged. > Since now ist_enter() disables preemption in any case, our hacks to > conditional_sti_ist() are pointless and could be removed. I'm supposed you will revert it and not need a revert patch from me. Thanks for the deeper cause analysis. Yang > > Sebastian > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h index b1b08a2..0e7bfe9 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ typedef struct { * TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME and set up the signal to be sent on exit of the * trap. */ -#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL) && defined(CONFIG_X86_64) +#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL) #define ARCH_RT_DELAYS_SIGNAL_SEND #endif
When running some ptrace single step tests on x86-32 machine, the below problem is triggered: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at linux-rt/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1041, name: dummy2 INFO: lockdep is turned off. Preemption disabled at:[<c100326f>] do_debug+0x1f/0x1a0 CPU: 10 PID: 1041 Comm: dummy2 Tainted: G W 4.1.13-rt13 #1 Hardware name: Intel Corporation S5520HC/S5520HC, BIOS S5500.86B.01.10.0025.030220091519 03/02/2009 00000000 00000000 e1811e80 c1aa8306 00000000 e1811ea8 c1080517 c1d8b2e8 c100326f c100326f 00000411 e5b7d5b4 e1d521c4 00000005 e1811f74 e1811ec4 c1ab0eff e1d51cc0 e5b7d180 c1081403 e5b7d180 e5b7d180 e1811ee4 c1064b5a Call Trace: [<c1aa8306>] dump_stack+0x46/0x5c [<c1080517>] ___might_sleep+0x137/0x220 [<c100326f>] ? do_debug+0x1f/0x1a0 [<c100326f>] ? do_debug+0x1f/0x1a0 [<c1ab0eff>] rt_spin_lock+0x1f/0x80 [<c1081403>] ? preempt_count_sub+0xb3/0x110 [<c1064b5a>] do_force_sig_info+0x2a/0xc0 [<c106567d>] force_sig_info+0xd/0x10 [<c1010cff>] send_sigtrap+0x6f/0x80 [<c10033b1>] do_debug+0x161/0x1a0 [<c1ab2921>] debug_stack_correct+0x2e/0x35 Signal send delay is just available for x86-64, x86-32 needs it too. Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/signal.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.0.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/