Message ID | 1470077883-7419-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi Bjorn, On 08/01/2016 08:58 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > Introduce an "always-on" flag on rprocs to make it possible to flag > remote processors without vdevs to automatically boot once the firmware > is found. > Should this flag rather be named "auto-boot"? From my pov, "always-on" means coprocessor can't be shutdown. > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > Cc: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 13 ------------- > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index fe0539ed9cb5..7e7f24fcac69 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -933,6 +933,10 @@ static void rproc_fw_config_virtio(const struct firmware *fw, void *context) > /* look for virtio devices and register them */ > ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, tablesz, rproc_vdev_handler); > > + /* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */ > + if (rproc->always_on) > + rproc_boot_nowait(rproc); > + > out: > release_firmware(fw); > /* allow rproc_del() contexts, if any, to proceed */ > @@ -978,11 +982,16 @@ static int rproc_add_virtio_devices(struct rproc *rproc) > int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc) > { > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, *rvtmp; > + int ret; > > dev_err(&rproc->dev, "recovering %s\n", rproc->name); > > init_completion(&rproc->crash_comp); > > + /* shut down the remote */ > + /* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */ > + rproc_shutdown(rproc); > + > /* clean up remote vdev entries */ > list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, rvtmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node) > rproc_remove_virtio_dev(rvdev); > @@ -993,7 +1002,17 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc) > /* Free the copy of the resource table */ > kfree(rproc->cached_table); > > - return rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); > + ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + /* > + * boot the remote processor up again, waiting for the async fw load to > + * finish > + */ > + rproc_boot(rproc); You are changing current behavior by forcing rproc boot whatever "always-on". Moreover coprocessor already rebooted by rproc_add_virtio_device if "always-on" flag is set, doesn't it? If yes, rproc->power will be equal to 2 and rproc_shutdown call will failed as this second rproc_boot call is unknown from customer pov. Regards, Loic > + > + return 0; > } > > /** > @@ -1374,6 +1393,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name, > rproc->name = name; > rproc->ops = ops; > rproc->priv = &rproc[1]; > + rproc->always_on = true; > > device_initialize(&rproc->dev); > rproc->dev.parent = dev; > @@ -1452,6 +1472,11 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc) > /* if rproc is just being registered, wait */ > wait_for_completion(&rproc->firmware_loading_complete); > > + /* if rproc is marked always-on, rproc_add() booted it */ > + /* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */ > + if (rproc->always_on) > + rproc_shutdown(rproc); > + > /* clean up remote vdev entries */ > list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, tmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node) > rproc_remove_virtio_dev(rvdev); > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > index cc91556313e1..574c90ce07f7 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c > @@ -136,11 +136,6 @@ static void __rproc_virtio_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > static void rproc_virtio_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev) > { > - struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev); > - > - /* power down the remote processor before deleting vqs */ > - rproc_shutdown(rproc); > - > __rproc_virtio_del_vqs(vdev); > } > > @@ -149,7 +144,6 @@ static int rproc_virtio_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs, > vq_callback_t *callbacks[], > const char * const names[]) > { > - struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev); > int i, ret; > > for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i) { > @@ -160,13 +154,6 @@ static int rproc_virtio_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs, > } > } > > - /* now that the vqs are all set, boot the remote processor */ > - ret = rproc_boot_nowait(rproc); > - if (ret) { > - dev_err(&rproc->dev, "rproc_boot() failed %d\n", ret); > - goto error; > - } > - > return 0; > > error: > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > index 1c457a8dd5a6..bd1cfcbb57b9 100644 > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > @@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ struct rproc { > struct resource_table *cached_table; > u32 table_csum; > bool has_iommu; > + bool always_on; > }; > > /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */ >
On Tue 02 Aug 08:17 PDT 2016, loic pallardy wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > On 08/01/2016 08:58 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > >Introduce an "always-on" flag on rprocs to make it possible to flag > >remote processors without vdevs to automatically boot once the firmware > >is found. > > > Should this flag rather be named "auto-boot"? From my pov, "always-on" means > coprocessor can't be shutdown. > I saw it from the view of the remoteproc driver, in which case it's always-on. But I'm fine with naming it "auto-boot" instead. [..] > >diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c [..] > >@@ -978,11 +982,16 @@ static int rproc_add_virtio_devices(struct rproc *rproc) > > int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc) > > { > > struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, *rvtmp; > >+ int ret; > > > > dev_err(&rproc->dev, "recovering %s\n", rproc->name); > > > > init_completion(&rproc->crash_comp); > > > >+ /* shut down the remote */ > >+ /* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */ > >+ rproc_shutdown(rproc); > >+ > > /* clean up remote vdev entries */ > > list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, rvtmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node) > > rproc_remove_virtio_dev(rvdev); > >@@ -993,7 +1002,17 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc) > > /* Free the copy of the resource table */ > > kfree(rproc->cached_table); > > > >- return rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); > >+ ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); > >+ if (ret) > >+ return ret; > >+ > >+ /* > >+ * boot the remote processor up again, waiting for the async fw load to > >+ * finish > >+ */ > >+ rproc_boot(rproc); > You are changing current behavior by forcing rproc boot whatever > "always-on". Moreover coprocessor already rebooted by > rproc_add_virtio_device if "always-on" flag is set, doesn't it? > If yes, rproc->power will be equal to 2 and rproc_shutdown call will failed > as this second rproc_boot call is unknown from customer pov. > rproc_add_virtio_devices() does no longer call rproc_boot(), this patch moves that call. So for always-on rprocs "power" will go 1 -> 0 -> 1 in this function. What does change is that for a non-always-on case. If we have 1 client that has requested rproc_boot() then the current implementation will bring "power" down to 1 and we will wait until the client for some reason calls rproc_shutdown(). After that we might boot the system again, if there are any vdevs in the resource table. Here we will bring "power" from 1 -> 0 -> 1, without regarding who's holding references. > >+ > >+ return 0; > > } Regards, Bjorn
On 08/04/2016 12:02 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue 02 Aug 08:17 PDT 2016, loic pallardy wrote: > >> Hi Bjorn, >> >> On 08/01/2016 08:58 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: >>> Introduce an "always-on" flag on rprocs to make it possible to flag >>> remote processors without vdevs to automatically boot once the firmware >>> is found. >>> >> Should this flag rather be named "auto-boot"? From my pov, "always-on" means >> coprocessor can't be shutdown. >> > > I saw it from the view of the remoteproc driver, in which case it's > always-on. But I'm fine with naming it "auto-boot" instead. > > [..] >>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > [..] >>> @@ -978,11 +982,16 @@ static int rproc_add_virtio_devices(struct rproc *rproc) >>> int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc) >>> { >>> struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, *rvtmp; >>> + int ret; >>> >>> dev_err(&rproc->dev, "recovering %s\n", rproc->name); >>> >>> init_completion(&rproc->crash_comp); >>> >>> + /* shut down the remote */ >>> + /* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */ >>> + rproc_shutdown(rproc); >>> + >>> /* clean up remote vdev entries */ >>> list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, rvtmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node) >>> rproc_remove_virtio_dev(rvdev); >>> @@ -993,7 +1002,17 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc) >>> /* Free the copy of the resource table */ >>> kfree(rproc->cached_table); >>> >>> - return rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); >>> + ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); >>> + if (ret) >>> + return ret; >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * boot the remote processor up again, waiting for the async fw load to >>> + * finish >>> + */ >>> + rproc_boot(rproc); >> You are changing current behavior by forcing rproc boot whatever >> "always-on". Moreover coprocessor already rebooted by >> rproc_add_virtio_device if "always-on" flag is set, doesn't it? >> If yes, rproc->power will be equal to 2 and rproc_shutdown call will failed >> as this second rproc_boot call is unknown from customer pov. >> > > rproc_add_virtio_devices() does no longer call rproc_boot(), this patch > moves that call. So for always-on rprocs "power" will go 1 -> 0 -> 1 in > this function. > > What does change is that for a non-always-on case. > > If we have 1 client that has requested rproc_boot() then the current > implementation will bring "power" down to 1 and we will wait until the > client for some reason calls rproc_shutdown(). After that we might boot > the system again, if there are any vdevs in the resource table. > > Here we will bring "power" from 1 -> 0 -> 1, without regarding who's > holding references. I'm fine with the final sequence in which only rproc_shutdown and rproc_boot are called (with patch 3 modifications). But having a look only to this patch, we have the following function call: rproc_trigger_recovery |__ rproc_shutdown --> power from 1 -> 0 |__ rproc_add_virtio_devices |__ rproc_fw_config_virtio |__ (if always_on == 1) rproc_boot_nowait --> power from 0 --> 1 |__ rproc_boot if always_on == 1 power from 1 --> 2 else power from 0 --> 1 on this patch rproc_boot should be called only is always_on flag is not set. With patch 3, call to rproc_add_virtio_devices is suppressed and behavior is ok. Regards, Loic > >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> } > > Regards, > Bjorn >
On Thu 04 Aug 02:44 PDT 2016, loic pallardy wrote: > >>>diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c [..] > >>>@@ -993,7 +1002,17 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc) > >>> /* Free the copy of the resource table */ > >>> kfree(rproc->cached_table); > >>> > >>>- return rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); > >>>+ ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); > >>>+ if (ret) > >>>+ return ret; > >>>+ > >>>+ /* > >>>+ * boot the remote processor up again, waiting for the async fw load to > >>>+ * finish > >>>+ */ > >>>+ rproc_boot(rproc); > >>You are changing current behavior by forcing rproc boot whatever > >>"always-on". Moreover coprocessor already rebooted by > >>rproc_add_virtio_device if "always-on" flag is set, doesn't it? > >>If yes, rproc->power will be equal to 2 and rproc_shutdown call will failed > >>as this second rproc_boot call is unknown from customer pov. > >> > > > >rproc_add_virtio_devices() does no longer call rproc_boot(), this patch > >moves that call. So for always-on rprocs "power" will go 1 -> 0 -> 1 in > >this function. > > > >What does change is that for a non-always-on case. > > > >If we have 1 client that has requested rproc_boot() then the current > >implementation will bring "power" down to 1 and we will wait until the > >client for some reason calls rproc_shutdown(). After that we might boot > >the system again, if there are any vdevs in the resource table. > > > >Here we will bring "power" from 1 -> 0 -> 1, without regarding who's > >holding references. > > I'm fine with the final sequence in which only rproc_shutdown and rproc_boot > are called (with patch 3 modifications). > > But having a look only to this patch, we have the following function call: > > rproc_trigger_recovery > |__ rproc_shutdown --> power from 1 -> 0 > |__ rproc_add_virtio_devices > |__ rproc_fw_config_virtio > |__ (if always_on == 1) rproc_boot_nowait --> power from 0 --> 1 > |__ rproc_boot > if always_on == 1 power from 1 --> 2 > else power from 0 --> 1 > > on this patch rproc_boot should be called only is always_on flag is not set. > > With patch 3, call to rproc_add_virtio_devices is suppressed and behavior is > ok. > Doh! Thanks for the explanation, you're of course correct. Regards, Bjorn
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index fe0539ed9cb5..7e7f24fcac69 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -933,6 +933,10 @@ static void rproc_fw_config_virtio(const struct firmware *fw, void *context) /* look for virtio devices and register them */ ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, tablesz, rproc_vdev_handler); + /* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */ + if (rproc->always_on) + rproc_boot_nowait(rproc); + out: release_firmware(fw); /* allow rproc_del() contexts, if any, to proceed */ @@ -978,11 +982,16 @@ static int rproc_add_virtio_devices(struct rproc *rproc) int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc) { struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, *rvtmp; + int ret; dev_err(&rproc->dev, "recovering %s\n", rproc->name); init_completion(&rproc->crash_comp); + /* shut down the remote */ + /* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */ + rproc_shutdown(rproc); + /* clean up remote vdev entries */ list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, rvtmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node) rproc_remove_virtio_dev(rvdev); @@ -993,7 +1002,17 @@ int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc) /* Free the copy of the resource table */ kfree(rproc->cached_table); - return rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); + ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* + * boot the remote processor up again, waiting for the async fw load to + * finish + */ + rproc_boot(rproc); + + return 0; } /** @@ -1374,6 +1393,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name, rproc->name = name; rproc->ops = ops; rproc->priv = &rproc[1]; + rproc->always_on = true; device_initialize(&rproc->dev); rproc->dev.parent = dev; @@ -1452,6 +1472,11 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc) /* if rproc is just being registered, wait */ wait_for_completion(&rproc->firmware_loading_complete); + /* if rproc is marked always-on, rproc_add() booted it */ + /* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */ + if (rproc->always_on) + rproc_shutdown(rproc); + /* clean up remote vdev entries */ list_for_each_entry_safe(rvdev, tmp, &rproc->rvdevs, node) rproc_remove_virtio_dev(rvdev); diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c index cc91556313e1..574c90ce07f7 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c @@ -136,11 +136,6 @@ static void __rproc_virtio_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev) static void rproc_virtio_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev) { - struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev); - - /* power down the remote processor before deleting vqs */ - rproc_shutdown(rproc); - __rproc_virtio_del_vqs(vdev); } @@ -149,7 +144,6 @@ static int rproc_virtio_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs, vq_callback_t *callbacks[], const char * const names[]) { - struct rproc *rproc = vdev_to_rproc(vdev); int i, ret; for (i = 0; i < nvqs; ++i) { @@ -160,13 +154,6 @@ static int rproc_virtio_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs, } } - /* now that the vqs are all set, boot the remote processor */ - ret = rproc_boot_nowait(rproc); - if (ret) { - dev_err(&rproc->dev, "rproc_boot() failed %d\n", ret); - goto error; - } - return 0; error: diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h index 1c457a8dd5a6..bd1cfcbb57b9 100644 --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h @@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ struct rproc { struct resource_table *cached_table; u32 table_csum; bool has_iommu; + bool always_on; }; /* we currently support only two vrings per rvdev */
Introduce an "always-on" flag on rprocs to make it possible to flag remote processors without vdevs to automatically boot once the firmware is found. Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Cc: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 13 ------------- include/linux/remoteproc.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) -- 2.5.0