@@ -241,7 +241,8 @@ static int rpm_check_suspend_allowed(struct device *dev)
retval = -EACCES;
else if (atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count) > 0)
retval = -EAGAIN;
- else if (!pm_children_suspended(dev))
+ else if (!dev->power.ignore_children &&
+ atomic_read(&dev->power.child_count))
retval = -EBUSY;
/* Pending resume requests take precedence over suspends. */
@@ -61,12 +61,6 @@ static inline void pm_suspend_ignore_children(struct device *dev, bool enable)
dev->power.ignore_children = enable;
}
-static inline bool pm_children_suspended(struct device *dev)
-{
- return dev->power.ignore_children
- || !atomic_read(&dev->power.child_count);
-}
-
static inline void pm_runtime_get_noresume(struct device *dev)
{
atomic_inc(&dev->power.usage_count);
@@ -162,7 +156,6 @@ static inline void pm_runtime_allow(struct device *dev) {}
static inline void pm_runtime_forbid(struct device *dev) {}
static inline void pm_suspend_ignore_children(struct device *dev, bool enable) {}
-static inline bool pm_children_suspended(struct device *dev) { return false; }
static inline void pm_runtime_get_noresume(struct device *dev) {}
static inline void pm_runtime_put_noidle(struct device *dev) {}
static inline bool device_run_wake(struct device *dev) { return false; }
The exported function pm_children_suspended() has only one caller, which is the runtime PM internal function, rpm_check_suspend_allowed(). Let's clean-up this code, by removing pm_children_suspended() altogether and instead do the one-liner check directly in rpm_check_suspend_allowed(). Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> --- drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 3 ++- include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 7 ------- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1