| Message ID | 20161031085008.GF19531@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Hi Akashi-san, sorry for the long delay(s). The patch below seems reasonable to me and I'm happy to apply it. On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 05:50:09PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Simon, > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:29:59AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > Simon, > > > > What is your opinion on this issue? > > Pinged you several times so far. > > Can you please give me your comment? > (attached below is the original patch.) > > -Takahiro AKASHI > > > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:52:40PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 06:23:56PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:12:26AM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2016-07-29 at 09:27 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > So, these functions are a mess and need fixing. > > > > > > > > > > Since this change isn't really related to arm64 support, I'll > > > > > drop this patch from my series. > > > > > > > > Do you have a case which triggers bugs in this code? > > > > > > Actually, this patch was necessary when my kdump used "usable-memory" > > > properties in "memory" nodes, as on ppc64, to limit the usable memory > > > regions that can be used by crash dump kernel. > > > Since then, I've moved to the approach of using "mem=" kernel parameter, > > > then introducing a new property, "linux,usable-memory-range," under /chosen > > > and now we don't need this patch any more. > > > > > > So, we can drop it but I still believe that it is buggy. > > > > Due to the discussions[1], I may want to re-enable "usable-memory" > > property on arm64. In addition, I would like to add a function, > > dtb_add_usable_memory_properties(), a variant of > > add_usable_memory_properties(), to kexec/dt-ops.c. > > So this issue is quite crucial now. > > > > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-August/452685.html > > > > -Takahiro AKASHI > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Takahiro AKASHI > > > > > > > -- > > > > RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > > > > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up > > > > according to speedtest.net. > ===8<=== > From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> > > The end address of "reg" attribute in device tree's memory should be > inclusive. > --- > kexec/fs2dt.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kexec/fs2dt.c b/kexec/fs2dt.c > index 79aa0f3..953f78a 100644 > --- a/kexec/fs2dt.c > +++ b/kexec/fs2dt.c > @@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ static void add_dyn_reconf_usable_mem_property__(int fd) > ranges_size*8); > } > ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_base); > - ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_end - loc_base); > + ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_end > + - loc_base + 1); > rngs_cnt++; > } > } > @@ -350,7 +351,7 @@ static void add_usable_mem_property(int fd, size_t len) > ranges_size*sizeof(*ranges)); > } > ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_base); > - ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_end - loc_base); > + ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_end - loc_base + 1); > } > } > > -- > 2.10.0 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
===8<=== From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> The end address of "reg" attribute in device tree's memory should be inclusive. --- kexec/fs2dt.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kexec/fs2dt.c b/kexec/fs2dt.c index 79aa0f3..953f78a 100644 --- a/kexec/fs2dt.c +++ b/kexec/fs2dt.c @@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ static void add_dyn_reconf_usable_mem_property__(int fd) ranges_size*8); } ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_base); - ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_end - loc_base); + ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_end + - loc_base + 1); rngs_cnt++; } } @@ -350,7 +351,7 @@ static void add_usable_mem_property(int fd, size_t len) ranges_size*sizeof(*ranges)); } ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_base); - ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_end - loc_base); + ranges[rlen++] = cpu_to_be64(loc_end - loc_base + 1); } }