Message ID | 4037550.DMaVTE01Aq@wuerfel |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >> wireless-drivers trees. > > I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take > that one too? I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for Michael or Rafal :) Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. -- Kalle Valo
On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: > >> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>> wireless-drivers trees. >> >> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >> that one too? > > I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for > Michael or Rafal :) > > Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC > linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the linux-wireless patchwork. -- Rafał
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> writes: > On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes: >> >>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote: >>>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my >>>> wireless-drivers trees. >>> >>> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take >>> that one too? >> >> I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for >> Michael or Rafal :) >> >> Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC >> linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork. > > It was already sent once and Acked by Michael: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/ > > The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the > linux-wireless patchwork. Ah, that's why I missed it. I only follow patchwork, I basically ignore patches which are sent via email. Arnd, can you please resend the patch and CC linux-wireless? Sorry for the trouble. To avoid this in the future I think we should replace netdev with linux-wireless in the MAINTAINERS entry: SONICS SILICON BACKPLANE DRIVER (SSB) M: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch> L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: drivers/ssb/ F: include/linux/ssb/ Are people ok with that? Patches welcome :) -- Kalle Valo
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c index cde5ff7529eb..d1a750760cf3 100644 --- a/drivers/ssb/main.c +++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c @@ -613,9 +613,10 @@ out: return err; } -static int ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, - ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants, - unsigned long baseaddr) +static int __maybe_unused +ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, + ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants, + unsigned long baseaddr) { int err;