| Message ID | 20180110205137.2044979-1-arnd@arndb.de |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | e36c048a9bd853b64c2b32a2ed90be2eff9bbd62 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | CIFS: SMBD: work around gcc -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning | expand |
> GCC versions from 4.9 to 6.3 produce a false-positive warning when dealing > with a conditional spin_lock_irqsave(): > > fs/cifs/smbdirect.c: In function 'smbd_recv_buf': > include/linux/spinlock.h:260:3: warning: 'flags' may be used uninitialized in > this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > > This function calls some sleeping interfaces, so it is clear that it does not get > called with interrupts disabled and there is no need to save the irq state > before taking the spinlock. This lets us remove the variable, which makes the > function slightly more efficient and avoids the warning. > > A further cleanup could do the same change for other functions in this file, > but I did not want to take this too far for now. > > Fixes: ac69f66e54ca ("CIFS: SMBD: Implement function to receive data via > RDMA receive") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com> > --- > fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 15 ++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c index > f527e22650f5..f9234ed83a60 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c > @@ -1862,7 +1862,6 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, > char *buf, unsigned int size) > int to_copy, to_read, data_read, offset; > u32 data_length, remaining_data_length, data_offset; > int rc; > - unsigned long flags; > > again: > if (info->transport_status != SMBD_CONNECTED) { @@ -1935,15 > +1934,13 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, > unsigned int size) > * end of the queue > */ > if (!queue_length) > - spin_lock_irqsave( > - &info- > >reassembly_queue_lock, > - flags); > + spin_lock_irq( > + &info- > >reassembly_queue_lock); > list_del(&response->list); > queue_removed++; > if (!queue_length) > - spin_unlock_irqrestore( > - &info- > >reassembly_queue_lock, > - flags); > + spin_unlock_irq( > + &info- > >reassembly_queue_lock); > > info->count_reassembly_queue--; > info- > >count_dequeue_reassembly_queue++; > @@ -1963,10 +1960,10 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection > *info, char *buf, unsigned int size) > to_read, data_read, offset); > } > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, flags); > + spin_lock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock); > info->reassembly_data_length -= data_read; > info->reassembly_queue_length -= queue_removed; > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, > flags); > + spin_unlock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock); > > info->first_entry_offset = offset; > log_read(INFO, "returning to thread data_read=%d " > -- > 2.9.0
merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next Also noticed a few sparse warnings in the same file that need to be cleaned up On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > GCC versions from 4.9 to 6.3 produce a false-positive warning when > dealing with a conditional spin_lock_irqsave(): > > fs/cifs/smbdirect.c: In function 'smbd_recv_buf': > include/linux/spinlock.h:260:3: warning: 'flags' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > > This function calls some sleeping interfaces, so it is clear that it > does not get called with interrupts disabled and there is no need > to save the irq state before taking the spinlock. This lets us > remove the variable, which makes the function slightly more efficient > and avoids the warning. > > A further cleanup could do the same change for other functions in this > file, but I did not want to take this too far for now. > > Fixes: ac69f66e54ca ("CIFS: SMBD: Implement function to receive data via RDMA receive") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 15 ++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c > index f527e22650f5..f9234ed83a60 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c > @@ -1862,7 +1862,6 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size) > int to_copy, to_read, data_read, offset; > u32 data_length, remaining_data_length, data_offset; > int rc; > - unsigned long flags; > > again: > if (info->transport_status != SMBD_CONNECTED) { > @@ -1935,15 +1934,13 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size) > * end of the queue > */ > if (!queue_length) > - spin_lock_irqsave( > - &info->reassembly_queue_lock, > - flags); > + spin_lock_irq( > + &info->reassembly_queue_lock); > list_del(&response->list); > queue_removed++; > if (!queue_length) > - spin_unlock_irqrestore( > - &info->reassembly_queue_lock, > - flags); > + spin_unlock_irq( > + &info->reassembly_queue_lock); > > info->count_reassembly_queue--; > info->count_dequeue_reassembly_queue++; > @@ -1963,10 +1960,10 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size) > to_read, data_read, offset); > } > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, flags); > + spin_lock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock); > info->reassembly_data_length -= data_read; > info->reassembly_queue_length -= queue_removed; > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, flags); > + spin_unlock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock); > > info->first_entry_offset = offset; > log_read(INFO, "returning to thread data_read=%d " > -- > 2.9.0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Thanks, Steve
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c index f527e22650f5..f9234ed83a60 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c +++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c @@ -1862,7 +1862,6 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size) int to_copy, to_read, data_read, offset; u32 data_length, remaining_data_length, data_offset; int rc; - unsigned long flags; again: if (info->transport_status != SMBD_CONNECTED) { @@ -1935,15 +1934,13 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size) * end of the queue */ if (!queue_length) - spin_lock_irqsave( - &info->reassembly_queue_lock, - flags); + spin_lock_irq( + &info->reassembly_queue_lock); list_del(&response->list); queue_removed++; if (!queue_length) - spin_unlock_irqrestore( - &info->reassembly_queue_lock, - flags); + spin_unlock_irq( + &info->reassembly_queue_lock); info->count_reassembly_queue--; info->count_dequeue_reassembly_queue++; @@ -1963,10 +1960,10 @@ int smbd_recv_buf(struct smbd_connection *info, char *buf, unsigned int size) to_read, data_read, offset); } - spin_lock_irqsave(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock); info->reassembly_data_length -= data_read; info->reassembly_queue_length -= queue_removed; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&info->reassembly_queue_lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irq(&info->reassembly_queue_lock); info->first_entry_offset = offset; log_read(INFO, "returning to thread data_read=%d "
GCC versions from 4.9 to 6.3 produce a false-positive warning when dealing with a conditional spin_lock_irqsave(): fs/cifs/smbdirect.c: In function 'smbd_recv_buf': include/linux/spinlock.h:260:3: warning: 'flags' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] This function calls some sleeping interfaces, so it is clear that it does not get called with interrupts disabled and there is no need to save the irq state before taking the spinlock. This lets us remove the variable, which makes the function slightly more efficient and avoids the warning. A further cleanup could do the same change for other functions in this file, but I did not want to take this too far for now. Fixes: ac69f66e54ca ("CIFS: SMBD: Implement function to receive data via RDMA receive") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 15 ++++++--------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.9.0