Message ID | 20191007043611.31036-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | doc: move namespaces.rst out of kbuild directory | expand |
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:36:11PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > I did not notice this document was added to Documentation/kbuild/, > and I do not understand how it is related to the build system. > > Kick it out of the kbuild directory. Should we delete the file entirely or does it belong somewhere else? It was added in c4f4af4094d6c7dbca3acd8d04df2759d268a116 and is referenced in `Documentation/kernel-hacking/hacking.rst`. Can we put into the `kernel-hacking` directory? > I am not sure if this is the perfect place, but I added its index > close to the module-signing. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> > --- > > Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst | 1 + > Documentation/{kbuild => admin-guide}/namespaces.rst | 0 > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > rename Documentation/{kbuild => admin-guide}/namespaces.rst (100%) > > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst > index 34cc20ee7f3a..ca632fda700f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst > @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ configure specific aspects of kernel behavior to your liking. > parport > md > module-signing > + namespaces > rapidio > sysrq > unicode > diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/namespaces.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/namespaces.rst > similarity index 100% > rename from Documentation/kbuild/namespaces.rst > rename to Documentation/admin-guide/namespaces.rst > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 55199ef7fa74..91815dcc5914 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -11547,6 +11547,7 @@ NSDEPS > M: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com> > S: Maintained > F: scripts/nsdeps > +F: Documentation/admin-guide/namespaces.rst > > NTB AMD DRIVER > M: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> > -- > 2.17.1 >
Hi! On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:36:11PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >I did not notice this document was added to Documentation/kbuild/, >and I do not understand how it is related to the build system. > >Kick it out of the kbuild directory. > >I am not sure if this is the perfect place, but I added its index >close to the module-signing. When searching for a place for this documentation, kbuild/ was the closest I could find. admin-guide/ seems to target system administrators while the symbol namespace feature documentation is relevant for kernel developers. I am ok to take maintainership for the file, but the new location suggested seems not to be a good fit either. Cheers, Matthias >Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> >--- > > Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst | 1 + > Documentation/{kbuild => admin-guide}/namespaces.rst | 0 > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > rename Documentation/{kbuild => admin-guide}/namespaces.rst (100%) > >diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst >index 34cc20ee7f3a..ca632fda700f 100644 >--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst >+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst >@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ configure specific aspects of kernel behavior to your liking. > parport > md > module-signing >+ namespaces > rapidio > sysrq > unicode >diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/namespaces.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/namespaces.rst >similarity index 100% >rename from Documentation/kbuild/namespaces.rst >rename to Documentation/admin-guide/namespaces.rst >diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >index 55199ef7fa74..91815dcc5914 100644 >--- a/MAINTAINERS >+++ b/MAINTAINERS >@@ -11547,6 +11547,7 @@ NSDEPS > M: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com> > S: Maintained > F: scripts/nsdeps >+F: Documentation/admin-guide/namespaces.rst > > NTB AMD DRIVER > M: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> >-- >2.17.1 >
+++ Matthias Maennich [07/10/19 07:06 +0100]: >Hi! > >On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:36:11PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >>I did not notice this document was added to Documentation/kbuild/, >>and I do not understand how it is related to the build system. >> >>Kick it out of the kbuild directory. >> >>I am not sure if this is the perfect place, but I added its index >>close to the module-signing. > >When searching for a place for this documentation, kbuild/ was the >closest I could find. admin-guide/ seems to target system administrators >while the symbol namespace feature documentation is relevant for kernel >developers. I am ok to take maintainership for the file, but the new >location suggested seems not to be a good fit either. This was my line of thought as well, since the audience of admin-guide/ is sysadmins and users. Namespaces are mostly relevant to module authors and kernel developers. Currently, I don't think there is an existing good place in Documentation/ for this topic :-/ I suppose kernel-hacking/ might be the closest fit, as Adam suggested. Thanks, Jessica
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:12:42 +0200 Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> wrote: > This was my line of thought as well, since the audience of > admin-guide/ is sysadmins and users. Namespaces are mostly relevant to > module authors and kernel developers. Currently, I don't think there > is an existing good place in Documentation/ for this topic :-/ > I suppose kernel-hacking/ might be the closest fit, as Adam suggested. I didn't see this thread before responding in the first, naturally... I think the core-api manual is probably as good a place as any for this. Changing the name to something like symbol-namespaces.rst is probably a good idea, since most people think of other things when they see "namespaces". Or perhaps that mythical Somebody could expand it into a proper description of symbol exports in general...:) Thanks, jon
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 07:29:30AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:12:42 +0200 >Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> wrote: > >> This was my line of thought as well, since the audience of >> admin-guide/ is sysadmins and users. Namespaces are mostly relevant to >> module authors and kernel developers. Currently, I don't think there >> is an existing good place in Documentation/ for this topic :-/ >> I suppose kernel-hacking/ might be the closest fit, as Adam suggested. > >I didn't see this thread before responding in the first, naturally... > >I think the core-api manual is probably as good a place as any for this. >Changing the name to something like symbol-namespaces.rst is probably a >good idea, since most people think of other things when they see >"namespaces". Or perhaps that mythical Somebody could expand it into a >proper description of symbol exports in general...:) As I said in the other thread, I am happy for it to be moved to a better location. core-api/ as well as kernel-hacking/ seem to be good locations. I could imagine expanding the documentation, but would not like to commit to it right now. (Even though I feel very encouraged by your talk in Paris, Jon. Thanks for that!) Cheers, Matthias > >Thanks, > >jon
On 10/7/19 6:41 AM, Matthias Maennich wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 07:29:30AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:12:42 +0200 >> Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> wrote: >> >>> This was my line of thought as well, since the audience of >>> admin-guide/ is sysadmins and users. Namespaces are mostly relevant to >>> module authors and kernel developers. Currently, I don't think there >>> is an existing good place in Documentation/ for this topic :-/ >>> I suppose kernel-hacking/ might be the closest fit, as Adam suggested. >> >> I didn't see this thread before responding in the first, naturally... >> >> I think the core-api manual is probably as good a place as any for this. >> Changing the name to something like symbol-namespaces.rst is probably a >> good idea, since most people think of other things when they see >> "namespaces". Or perhaps that mythical Somebody could expand it into a >> proper description of symbol exports in general...:) > > As I said in the other thread, I am happy for it to be moved to a better > location. core-api/ as well as kernel-hacking/ seem to be good > locations. core-api/ please. kernel-hacking/ does not make any sense to me. > I could imagine expanding the documentation, but would not like to > commit to it right now. (Even though I feel very encouraged by your talk > in Paris, Jon. Thanks for that!) -- ~Randy
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst index 34cc20ee7f3a..ca632fda700f 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ configure specific aspects of kernel behavior to your liking. parport md module-signing + namespaces rapidio sysrq unicode diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/namespaces.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/namespaces.rst similarity index 100% rename from Documentation/kbuild/namespaces.rst rename to Documentation/admin-guide/namespaces.rst diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 55199ef7fa74..91815dcc5914 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -11547,6 +11547,7 @@ NSDEPS M: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com> S: Maintained F: scripts/nsdeps +F: Documentation/admin-guide/namespaces.rst NTB AMD DRIVER M: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
I did not notice this document was added to Documentation/kbuild/, and I do not understand how it is related to the build system. Kick it out of the kbuild directory. I am not sure if this is the perfect place, but I added its index close to the module-signing. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> --- Documentation/admin-guide/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/{kbuild => admin-guide}/namespaces.rst | 0 MAINTAINERS | 1 + 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+) rename Documentation/{kbuild => admin-guide}/namespaces.rst (100%) -- 2.17.1