| Message ID | 20191011002808.28206-10-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 10cb3d8706dbaa0521e761b96b3be5b7a497ae3f |
| Headers | show |
| Series | None | expand |
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:49:38AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > More grammar nitpicking... > >On 11.10.2019 3:28, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: > >>While compiling natively, the host's cflags and ldflags are equal to >>ones used from HOSTCFLAGS and HOSTLDFLAGS. When cross compiling it >>should have own, used for target arch. While verification, for arm, > > While verifying. While verification stage. > >>arm64 and x86_64 the following flags were used always: >> >>-Wall -O2 >>-fomit-frame-pointer >>-Wmissing-prototypes >>-Wstrict-prototypes >> >>So, add them as they were verified and used before adding >>Makefile.target and lets omit "-fomit-frame-pointer" as were proposed >>while review, as no sense in such optimization for samples. >> >>Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> >[...] > >MBR, Sergei -- Regards, Ivan Khoronzhuk
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 02:16:05PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >On 10/11/2019 12:57 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: > >>>> While compiling natively, the host's cflags and ldflags are equal to >>>> ones used from HOSTCFLAGS and HOSTLDFLAGS. When cross compiling it >>>> should have own, used for target arch. While verification, for arm, >>> >>> While verifying. >> While verification stage. > > While *in* verification stage, "while" doesn't combine with nouns w/o >a preposition. Sergei, better add me in cc list when msg is to me I can miss it. Regarding the language lesson, thanks, I will keep it in mind next time, but the issue is not rude, if it's an issue at all, so I better leave it as is, as not reasons to correct it w/o code changes and everyone is able to understand it. > >>>> arm64 and x86_64 the following flags were used always: >>>> >>>> -Wall -O2 >>>> -fomit-frame-pointer >>>> -Wmissing-prototypes >>>> -Wstrict-prototypes >>>> >>>> So, add them as they were verified and used before adding >>>> Makefile.target and lets omit "-fomit-frame-pointer" as were proposed >>>> while review, as no sense in such optimization for samples. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> >>> [...] > >MBR, Sergei -- Regards, Ivan Khoronzhuk
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile index 91bfb421c278..57a15ff938a6 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile @@ -176,8 +176,10 @@ BPF_EXTRA_CFLAGS := $(ARM_ARCH_SELECTOR) TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(ARM_ARCH_SELECTOR) endif -TPROGS_LDLIBS := $(KBUILD_HOSTLDLIBS) -TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS) $(HOST_EXTRACFLAGS) +TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 +TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wmissing-prototypes +TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wstrict-prototypes + TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(objtree)/usr/include TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf/ TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
While compiling natively, the host's cflags and ldflags are equal to ones used from HOSTCFLAGS and HOSTLDFLAGS. When cross compiling it should have own, used for target arch. While verification, for arm, arm64 and x86_64 the following flags were used always: -Wall -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes So, add them as they were verified and used before adding Makefile.target and lets omit "-fomit-frame-pointer" as were proposed while review, as no sense in such optimization for samples. Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> --- samples/bpf/Makefile | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1