| Message ID | 20200302093902.27849-6-cleger@kalray.eu |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | remoteproc: Add elf64 support | expand |
On Tue 03 Mar 00:02 PST 2020, Cl?ment Leger wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > ----- On 3 Mar, 2020, at 00:13, Bjorn Andersson bjorn.andersson@linaro.org wrote: > > > On Mon 02 Mar 01:38 PST 2020, Clement Leger wrote: > > > >> Since this function will be modified to support both elf32 and elf64, > >> rename the existing one to elf32 (which is the only supported format > >> at the moment). This will allow not to introduce possible side effect > >> when adding elf64 support (ie: all backends will still support only > >> elf32 if not requested explicitely using rproc_elf_sanity_check). > >> > > > > Is there a reason for preventing ELF64 binaries be loaded? > > I decided to go this way to let driver maintainer decide if they want > to support elf64 to avoid problems with 64bits addresses/sizes which do > not fit in their native type (size_t for instance). This is probably > not going to happen and there are additionnal checks before calling > rproc_da_to_va. And addresses should be filtered by rproc_da_to_va. > So, actually it seems there is no reason to forbid supporting elf32/64 > for all drivers. > I was hoping to hear some additional feedback on this from others. I've merge the patch as is, but think it would be nice to clean this up and just have the driver ignore if fed a 32 or 64-elf. Regards, Bjorn > Regards, > > Clément > > > > > Regards, > > Bjorn > > > >> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger <cleger@kalray.eu> > >> --- > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +- > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 6 +++--- > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 +- > >> drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 2 +- > >> drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c | 2 +- > >> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 2 +- > >> 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> index 4bfaf4a3c4a3..99f0b796fbc7 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> @@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char > >> *name, > >> rproc->ops->load = rproc_elf_load_segments; > >> rproc->ops->parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table; > >> rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table; > >> - rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check; > >> + rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check; > >> rproc->ops->get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr; > >> } > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c > >> index c2a9783cfb9a..5a67745f2638 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c > >> @@ -25,13 +25,13 @@ > >> #include "remoteproc_internal.h" > >> > >> /** > >> - * rproc_elf_sanity_check() - Sanity Check ELF firmware image > >> + * rproc_elf_sanity_check() - Sanity Check ELF32 firmware image > >> * @rproc: the remote processor handle > >> * @fw: the ELF firmware image > >> * > >> * Make sure this fw image is sane. > >> */ > >> -int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > >> +int rproc_elf32_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > >> { > >> const char *name = rproc->firmware; > >> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > >> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct > >> firmware *fw) > >> > >> return 0; > >> } > >> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf_sanity_check); > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf32_sanity_check); > >> > >> /** > >> * rproc_elf_get_boot_addr() - Get rproc's boot address. > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> index 0deae5f237b8..28639c588d58 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len); > >> phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr); > >> int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc); > >> > >> -int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > >> +int rproc_elf32_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > >> u64 rproc_elf_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > >> int rproc_elf_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > >> int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > >> index a3268d95a50e..a6cbfa452764 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > >> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = { > >> .parse_fw = st_rproc_parse_fw, > >> .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > >> .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, > >> - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, > >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check, > >> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, > >> }; > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> index 09bcb4d8b9e0..3cca8b65a8db 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops slim_rproc_ops = { > >> .da_to_va = slim_rproc_da_to_va, > >> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, > >> .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > >> - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, > >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check, > >> }; > >> > >> /** > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > >> index a18f88044111..9a8b5f5e2572 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > >> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = { > >> .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > >> .parse_fw = stm32_rproc_parse_fw, > >> .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, > >> - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, > >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check, > >> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, > >> }; > >> > >> -- > >> 2.15.0.276.g89ea799
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 09:38, Clément Leger <cleger@kalrayinc.com> wrote: > > Hi Mathieu, > > ----- On 10 Mar, 2020, at 16:20, Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:00:05PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > >> On Tue 03 Mar 00:02 PST 2020, Cl?ment Leger wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Bjorn, > >> > > >> > ----- On 3 Mar, 2020, at 00:13, Bjorn Andersson bjorn.andersson@linaro.org > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Mon 02 Mar 01:38 PST 2020, Clement Leger wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Since this function will be modified to support both elf32 and elf64, > >> > >> rename the existing one to elf32 (which is the only supported format > >> > >> at the moment). This will allow not to introduce possible side effect > >> > >> when adding elf64 support (ie: all backends will still support only > >> > >> elf32 if not requested explicitely using rproc_elf_sanity_check). > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > Is there a reason for preventing ELF64 binaries be loaded? > >> > > >> > I decided to go this way to let driver maintainer decide if they want > >> > to support elf64 to avoid problems with 64bits addresses/sizes which do > >> > not fit in their native type (size_t for instance). This is probably > >> > not going to happen and there are additionnal checks before calling > >> > rproc_da_to_va. And addresses should be filtered by rproc_da_to_va. > >> > So, actually it seems there is no reason to forbid supporting elf32/64 > >> > for all drivers. > >> > > >> > >> I was hoping to hear some additional feedback on this from others. > > > > I didn't follow up on this one because I agreed with your assesment and didn't > > think it was needed. > > > > Simply put I would rather see rproc_elf_sanity_check() gain support for elf64 > > and let the platform code decide what to do with format they don't support > > rather than spinning a new function. > > > >> > >> I've merge the patch as is, but think it would be nice to clean this up > >> and just have the driver ignore if fed a 32 or 64-elf. > > > > It would be really nice to see this cleaned up in time for the coming merge > > window... > > I could have sent a V7, but Bjorn was faster than my comment ;) > Bjorn, Is there any way to revert that or it's already pushed ? > I already have a clean V7. Just send another patchset that applies on top of this one. > > Thanks, > > Clément > > > > > Thanks > > Mathieu > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> Bjorn > >> > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Clément > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > Bjorn > >> > > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger <cleger@kalray.eu> > >> > >> --- > >> > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +- > >> > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 6 +++--- > >> > >> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 +- > >> > >> drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 2 +- > >> > >> drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c | 2 +- > >> > >> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 2 +- > >> > >> 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> > >> > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> > >> index 4bfaf4a3c4a3..99f0b796fbc7 100644 > >> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > >> > >> @@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char > >> > >> *name, > >> > >> rproc->ops->load = rproc_elf_load_segments; > >> > >> rproc->ops->parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table; > >> > >> rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table; > >> > >> - rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check; > >> > >> + rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check; > >> > >> rproc->ops->get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr; > >> > >> } > >> > >> > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c > >> > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c > >> > >> index c2a9783cfb9a..5a67745f2638 100644 > >> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c > >> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c > >> > >> @@ -25,13 +25,13 @@ > >> > >> #include "remoteproc_internal.h" > >> > >> > >> > >> /** > >> > >> - * rproc_elf_sanity_check() - Sanity Check ELF firmware image > >> > >> + * rproc_elf_sanity_check() - Sanity Check ELF32 firmware image > >> > >> * @rproc: the remote processor handle > >> > >> * @fw: the ELF firmware image > >> > >> * > >> > >> * Make sure this fw image is sane. > >> > >> */ > >> > >> -int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > >> > >> +int rproc_elf32_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > >> > >> { > >> > >> const char *name = rproc->firmware; > >> > >> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > >> > >> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct > >> > >> firmware *fw) > >> > >> > >> > >> return 0; > >> > >> } > >> > >> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf_sanity_check); > >> > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf32_sanity_check); > >> > >> > >> > >> /** > >> > >> * rproc_elf_get_boot_addr() - Get rproc's boot address. > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> > >> index 0deae5f237b8..28639c588d58 100644 > >> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > >> > >> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len); > >> > >> phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr); > >> > >> int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc); > >> > >> > >> > >> -int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > >> > >> +int rproc_elf32_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > >> > >> u64 rproc_elf_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > >> > >> int rproc_elf_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > >> > >> int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > >> > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > >> > >> index a3268d95a50e..a6cbfa452764 100644 > >> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > >> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c > >> > >> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = { > >> > >> .parse_fw = st_rproc_parse_fw, > >> > >> .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > >> > >> .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, > >> > >> - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, > >> > >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check, > >> > >> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, > >> > >> }; > >> > >> > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> > >> index 09bcb4d8b9e0..3cca8b65a8db 100644 > >> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c > >> > >> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops slim_rproc_ops = { > >> > >> .da_to_va = slim_rproc_da_to_va, > >> > >> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, > >> > >> .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > >> > >> - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, > >> > >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check, > >> > >> }; > >> > >> > >> > >> /** > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > >> > >> index a18f88044111..9a8b5f5e2572 100644 > >> > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > >> > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > >> > >> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = { > >> > >> .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > >> > >> .parse_fw = stm32_rproc_parse_fw, > >> > >> .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, > >> > >> - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, > >> > >> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check, > >> > >> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, > >> > >> }; > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > > > > >> 2.15.0.276.g89ea799
On Tue 10 Mar 08:38 PDT 2020, Cl?ment Leger wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > ----- On 10 Mar, 2020, at 16:20, Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:00:05PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > >> On Tue 03 Mar 00:02 PST 2020, Cl?ment Leger wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Bjorn, > >> > > >> > ----- On 3 Mar, 2020, at 00:13, Bjorn Andersson bjorn.andersson@linaro.org > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Mon 02 Mar 01:38 PST 2020, Clement Leger wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Since this function will be modified to support both elf32 and elf64, > >> > >> rename the existing one to elf32 (which is the only supported format > >> > >> at the moment). This will allow not to introduce possible side effect > >> > >> when adding elf64 support (ie: all backends will still support only > >> > >> elf32 if not requested explicitely using rproc_elf_sanity_check). > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > Is there a reason for preventing ELF64 binaries be loaded? > >> > > >> > I decided to go this way to let driver maintainer decide if they want > >> > to support elf64 to avoid problems with 64bits addresses/sizes which do > >> > not fit in their native type (size_t for instance). This is probably > >> > not going to happen and there are additionnal checks before calling > >> > rproc_da_to_va. And addresses should be filtered by rproc_da_to_va. > >> > So, actually it seems there is no reason to forbid supporting elf32/64 > >> > for all drivers. > >> > > >> > >> I was hoping to hear some additional feedback on this from others. > > > > I didn't follow up on this one because I agreed with your assesment and didn't > > think it was needed. > > > > Simply put I would rather see rproc_elf_sanity_check() gain support for elf64 > > and let the platform code decide what to do with format they don't support > > rather than spinning a new function. > > > >> > >> I've merge the patch as is, but think it would be nice to clean this up > >> and just have the driver ignore if fed a 32 or 64-elf. > > > > It would be really nice to see this cleaned up in time for the coming merge > > window... > > I could have sent a V7, but Bjorn was faster than my comment ;) I figured it had been maturing on the list long enough and expected the cleanup to be a nice incremental patch. > Bjorn, Is there any way to revert that or it's already pushed ? > I already have a clean V7. > Please base your changes on what's in rproc-next (and today's linux-next). Thank you, Bjorn
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 4bfaf4a3c4a3..99f0b796fbc7 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name, rproc->ops->load = rproc_elf_load_segments; rproc->ops->parse_fw = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table; rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table; - rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check; + rproc->ops->sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check; rproc->ops->get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr; } diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c index c2a9783cfb9a..5a67745f2638 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c @@ -25,13 +25,13 @@ #include "remoteproc_internal.h" /** - * rproc_elf_sanity_check() - Sanity Check ELF firmware image + * rproc_elf_sanity_check() - Sanity Check ELF32 firmware image * @rproc: the remote processor handle * @fw: the ELF firmware image * * Make sure this fw image is sane. */ -int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) +int rproc_elf32_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) { const char *name = rproc->firmware; struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) return 0; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf_sanity_check); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf32_sanity_check); /** * rproc_elf_get_boot_addr() - Get rproc's boot address. diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h index 0deae5f237b8..28639c588d58 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len); phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr); int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc); -int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); +int rproc_elf32_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); u64 rproc_elf_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); int rproc_elf_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c index a3268d95a50e..a6cbfa452764 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = { .parse_fw = st_rproc_parse_fw, .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check, .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, }; diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c index 09bcb4d8b9e0..3cca8b65a8db 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops slim_rproc_ops = { .da_to_va = slim_rproc_da_to_va, .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check, }; /** diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c index a18f88044111..9a8b5f5e2572 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = { .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, .parse_fw = stm32_rproc_parse_fw, .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, - .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, + .sanity_check = rproc_elf32_sanity_check, .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, };
Since this function will be modified to support both elf32 and elf64, rename the existing one to elf32 (which is the only supported format at the moment). This will allow not to introduce possible side effect when adding elf64 support (ie: all backends will still support only elf32 if not requested explicitely using rproc_elf_sanity_check). Signed-off-by: Clement Leger <cleger@kalray.eu> --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 6 +++--- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 +- drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 2 +- drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c | 2 +- drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)