Message ID | 20200831150910.317171-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | pc-bios: s390x: Cleanup part 2 | expand |
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200831150910.317171-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20200831150910.317171-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] pc-bios: s390x: Cleanup part 2 === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0 git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 git config --local diff.renames True git config --local diff.algorithm histogram ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback base.. === TEST SCRIPT END === From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu * [new tag] patchew/20200831150910.317171-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com -> patchew/20200831150910.317171-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com Switched to a new branch 'test' 62c6c18 pc-bios: s390x: Go into disabled wait when encountering a PGM exception 28a68e4 pc-bios: s390x: Save io and external new PSWs before overwriting them 58aec9e pc-bios: s390x: Use reset PSW if avaliable b4cf040 pc-bios: s390x: Save PSW rework 30bab1a pc-bios: s390x: Fix bootmap.c zipl component entry data handling === OUTPUT BEGIN === 1/5 Checking commit 30bab1ae7536 (pc-bios: s390x: Fix bootmap.c zipl component entry data handling) 2/5 Checking commit b4cf040a1e53 (pc-bios: s390x: Save PSW rework) 3/5 Checking commit 58aec9efd157 (pc-bios: s390x: Use reset PSW if avaliable) 4/5 Checking commit 28a68e4503b1 (pc-bios: s390x: Save io and external new PSWs before overwriting them) ERROR: externs should be avoided in .c files #22: FILE: pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c:17: +extern uint64_t psw_save_io[], psw_save_ext[]; total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 118 lines checked Patch 4/5 has style problems, please review. If any of these errors are false positives report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. 5/5 Checking commit 62c6c187c90f (pc-bios: s390x: Go into disabled wait when encountering a PGM exception) === OUTPUT END === Test command exited with code: 1 The full log is available at http://patchew.org/logs/20200831150910.317171-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com/testing.checkpatch/?type=message. --- Email generated automatically by Patchew [https://patchew.org/]. Please send your feedback to patchew-devel@redhat.com
On 9/1/20 6:59 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 31/08/2020 17.09, Janosch Frank wrote: >> If a blob provides a reset PSW then we should use it instead of >> branching to the PSW address and using our own mask. >> >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> >> --- >> pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c | 3 ++- >> pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- >> pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c >> index 8747c4ea26..5a03b1eb8b 100644 >> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c >> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c >> @@ -515,7 +515,8 @@ static void zipl_run(ScsiBlockPtr *pte) >> IPL_assert(entry->component_type == ZIPL_COMP_ENTRY_EXEC, "No EXEC entry"); >> >> /* should not return */ >> - jump_to_IPL_code(entry->compdat.load_psw & PSW_MASK_SHORT_ADDR); >> + write_reset_psw(entry->compdat.load_psw); >> + jump_to_IPL_code(0); >> } >> >> static void ipl_scsi(void) >> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c >> index b6aad32def..5b8352d257 100644 >> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c >> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c >> @@ -12,15 +12,21 @@ >> >> #define KERN_IMAGE_START 0x010000UL >> #define RESET_PSW_MASK (PSW_MASK_SHORTPSW | PSW_MASK_64) >> +#define RESET_PSW ((uint64_t)&jump_to_IPL_addr | RESET_PSW_MASK) >> >> static uint64_t *reset_psw = 0, save_psw, ipl_continue; >> >> +void write_reset_psw(uint64_t psw) >> +{ >> + *reset_psw = psw; >> +} >> + >> static void jump_to_IPL_addr(void) >> { >> __attribute__((noreturn)) void (*ipl)(void) = (void *)ipl_continue; >> >> /* Restore reset PSW */ >> - *reset_psw = save_psw; >> + write_reset_psw(save_psw); >> >> ipl(); >> /* should not return */ >> @@ -43,9 +49,10 @@ void jump_to_IPL_code(uint64_t address) >> * content of non-BIOS memory after we loaded the guest, so we >> * save the original content and restore it in jump_to_IPL_2. >> */ >> - save_psw = *reset_psw; >> - *reset_psw = (uint64_t) &jump_to_IPL_addr; >> - *reset_psw |= RESET_PSW_MASK; >> + if (address) { >> + save_psw = *reset_psw; >> + write_reset_psw(RESET_PSW); >> + } >> ipl_continue = address; >> debug_print_int("set IPL addr to", ipl_continue); > > In case you respin this series, I think I'd move the "ipl_continue = > address" into the if-statement, too, and change the debug_print_int line > to use address instead of ipl_continue. Hmm, my intention was to always have something printed. But I guess it would make more sense to print the reset psw addr in the ~address case. > >> @@ -77,7 +84,12 @@ void jump_to_low_kernel(void) >> >> /* Trying to get PSW at zero address */ >> if (*((uint64_t *)0) & RESET_PSW_MASK) { >> - jump_to_IPL_code((*((uint64_t *)0)) & PSW_MASK_SHORT_ADDR); >> + /* >> + * Surely nobody will try running directly from lowcore, so >> + * let's use 0 as an indication that we want to load the reset >> + * psw at 0x0 and not jump to the entry. >> + */ >> + jump_to_IPL_code(0); >> } >> >> /* No other option left, so use the Linux kernel start address */ >> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h >> index 36b884cced..7090720422 100644 >> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h >> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h >> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ int virtio_read(ulong sector, void *load_addr); >> void zipl_load(void); >> >> /* jump2ipl.c */ >> +void write_reset_psw(uint64_t psw); >> void jump_to_IPL_code(uint64_t address); >> void jump_to_low_kernel(void); > > Looks sane to me: > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > >
On 02/09/2020 10.46, Janosch Frank wrote: > On 9/1/20 6:59 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 31/08/2020 17.09, Janosch Frank wrote: >>> If a blob provides a reset PSW then we should use it instead of >>> branching to the PSW address and using our own mask. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> >>> --- >>> pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c | 3 ++- >>> pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- >>> pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h | 1 + >>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c >>> index 8747c4ea26..5a03b1eb8b 100644 >>> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c >>> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c >>> @@ -515,7 +515,8 @@ static void zipl_run(ScsiBlockPtr *pte) >>> IPL_assert(entry->component_type == ZIPL_COMP_ENTRY_EXEC, "No EXEC entry"); >>> >>> /* should not return */ >>> - jump_to_IPL_code(entry->compdat.load_psw & PSW_MASK_SHORT_ADDR); >>> + write_reset_psw(entry->compdat.load_psw); >>> + jump_to_IPL_code(0); >>> } >>> >>> static void ipl_scsi(void) >>> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c >>> index b6aad32def..5b8352d257 100644 >>> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c >>> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/jump2ipl.c >>> @@ -12,15 +12,21 @@ >>> >>> #define KERN_IMAGE_START 0x010000UL >>> #define RESET_PSW_MASK (PSW_MASK_SHORTPSW | PSW_MASK_64) >>> +#define RESET_PSW ((uint64_t)&jump_to_IPL_addr | RESET_PSW_MASK) >>> >>> static uint64_t *reset_psw = 0, save_psw, ipl_continue; >>> >>> +void write_reset_psw(uint64_t psw) >>> +{ >>> + *reset_psw = psw; >>> +} >>> + >>> static void jump_to_IPL_addr(void) >>> { >>> __attribute__((noreturn)) void (*ipl)(void) = (void *)ipl_continue; >>> >>> /* Restore reset PSW */ >>> - *reset_psw = save_psw; >>> + write_reset_psw(save_psw); >>> >>> ipl(); >>> /* should not return */ >>> @@ -43,9 +49,10 @@ void jump_to_IPL_code(uint64_t address) >>> * content of non-BIOS memory after we loaded the guest, so we >>> * save the original content and restore it in jump_to_IPL_2. >>> */ >>> - save_psw = *reset_psw; >>> - *reset_psw = (uint64_t) &jump_to_IPL_addr; >>> - *reset_psw |= RESET_PSW_MASK; >>> + if (address) { >>> + save_psw = *reset_psw; >>> + write_reset_psw(RESET_PSW); >>> + } >>> ipl_continue = address; >>> debug_print_int("set IPL addr to", ipl_continue); >> >> In case you respin this series, I think I'd move the "ipl_continue = >> address" into the if-statement, too, and change the debug_print_int line >> to use address instead of ipl_continue. > > Hmm, my intention was to always have something printed. > But I guess it would make more sense to print the reset psw addr in the > ~address case. I meant to only move the "ipl_continue = address" line and keep the debug_print_int() at its current place (you just have to replace ipl_continue there). But you're right, it would make more sense to print the PSW at address 0 in that case instead. Thomas