Message ID | cover.1606153547.git.jani.nikula@intel.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | relay: cleanup and const callbacks, take 2 | expand |
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> writes: > This is v2 of [1], with a number of cleanups added first based on > Christoph's feedback, making the actual constness patch much smaller and > cleaner. > > I don't know who actually maintains relay, it's not in MAINTAINERS - > Cc'd Andrew just in case. > > I'd think it would be simplest to queue patches 5-9 via whichever tree > the relay patches get merged. They're all one-liners so neglible > conflict potential. > > BR, > Jani. > > > [1] http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201118165320.26829-1-jani.nikula@intel.com > > > Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> > Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org > Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> > Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > Cc: QCA ath9k Development <ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > > > Jani Nikula (9): > relay: remove unused buf_mapped and buf_unmapped callbacks > relay: require non-NULL callbacks in relay_open() > relay: make create_buf_file and remove_buf_file callbacks mandatory > relay: allow the use of const callback structs > drm/i915: make relay callbacks const > ath10k: make relay callbacks const > ath11k: make relay callbacks const > ath9k: make relay callbacks const > blktrace: make relay callbacks const For ath9k, ath10k & ath11k: Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> +/* subbuf_start callback wrapper */ > +static int cb_subbuf_start(struct rchan_buf *buf, void *subbuf, > + void *prev_subbuf, size_t prev_padding) I don't think the comment adds any information over just looking at the function and the two callers. I'd also name it relay_subbuf_start instead of the cb_ prefix not used anywhere else in the file. > { > + if (buf->chan->cb->subbuf_start) > + return buf->chan->cb->subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, > + prev_subbuf, prev_padding); > + > if (relay_buf_full(buf)) > return 0; This could also be simplified a bit more to: if (!buf->chan->cb->subbuf_start) return !relay_buf_full(buf); return buf->chan->cb->subbuf_start(buf, subbuf, prev_subbuf, prev_padding); Otherwise this looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > Otherwise this looks good to me: v3 sent. > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Thanks for the reviews, appreciated. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center