| Message ID | 20201124094636.v2.3.I771b6594b2a4d5b7fe7e12a991a6640f46386e8d@changeid |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2,1/3] irqchip: qcom-pdc: Fix phantom irq when changing between rising/falling | expand |
Hi, On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 2:33 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/603c691f-3614-d87b-075a-0889e9ffc453@codeaurora.org > Please wait to land [1] before i confirm with HW team if this is indeed > valid case. Oh, oops. Somehow I thought your reply was in response to patch #3 in the series, not #1. I responded to patch #1 in the series now to make it clear to wait for you. > > @@ -187,15 +217,26 @@ static int msm_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > > if (WARN_ON(i == g->nfuncs)) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); > > + disable_irq(irq); > > > > - val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); > > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); > > + oldval = val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); > > val &= ~mask; > > val |= i << g->mux_bit; > > msm_writel_ctl(val, pctrl, g); > > - > > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); > > > > + /* > > + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from GPIO mode since muxing to/from > > + * the GPIO path can cause phantom edges. > > + */ > > + old_i = (oldval & mask) >> g->mux_bit; > > + if (old_i != i && > > + (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func || old_i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func)) > > + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, group, irq); > > + > > The phantom irq can come when switching to GPIO irq mode. so may be only > check if (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func) { Have you tested this experimentally? I have experimentally tested this and I can actually see an interrupt generated when I _leave_ GPIO as well as when I enter GPIO mode. If you can't see this I can re-setup my test, but this was one of those things that convinced me that the _transition_ is what was causing the fake interrupt. I think my test CL <https://crrev.com/c/2556012/> can help you with testing if you wish. > even better if you can clear this unconditionally. Why? It should only matter if we're going to/from GPIO mode. > > @@ -456,32 +497,49 @@ static const struct pinconf_ops msm_pinconf_ops = { > > static int msm_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) > > { > > const struct msm_pingroup *g; > > + unsigned int irq = irq_find_mapping(chip->irq.domain, offset); > > struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > > unsigned long flags; > > + u32 oldval; > > u32 val; > > > > g = &pctrl->soc->groups[offset]; > > > > + disable_irq(irq); > > + > > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); > > > > - val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); > > + oldval = val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); > > val &= ~BIT(g->oe_bit); > > msm_writel_ctl(val, pctrl, g); > > > > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); > > > > + /* > > + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from input mode since that can use > > + * a phantom edge. > > + */ > > + if (oldval != val) > > + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, offset, irq); > same as above, can you clear this unconditionally. Any reason why? If we didn't change anything then there's no reason to go through all this extra code? > > static int msm_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value) > > { > > const struct msm_pingroup *g; > > + unsigned int irq = irq_find_mapping(chip->irq.domain, offset); > > struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > > unsigned long flags; > > + u32 oldval; > > u32 val; > > > > g = &pctrl->soc->groups[offset]; > > > > + disable_irq(irq); > > + > > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); > > > > val = msm_readl_io(pctrl, g); > > @@ -491,12 +549,21 @@ static int msm_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, in > > val &= ~BIT(g->out_bit); > > msm_writel_io(val, pctrl, g); > > > > - val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); > > + oldval = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); > > should be, oldval = val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); > > otherwise val will carry invalid value. Whoa! Good catch. How did I miss that and how did it not fail? I will fix in a v3 but will wait until other questions are resolved before sending. > > val |= BIT(g->oe_bit); > > msm_writel_ctl(val, pctrl, g); > > > > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); > > > > + /* > > + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from input mode since that can use > > + * a phantom edge. > > + */ > > + if (oldval != val) > > + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, offset, irq); > > i don't see a reason to clear the edges when switching to output mode. > > can you remove the changes from .direction_output callback? I haven't confirmed that this can glitch, however I did confirm that I could glitch when muxing _away_ from GPIO mode. This makes me believe that I could also glitch when muxing to an output. I can try to concoct a test for this if necessary. > > @@ -792,17 +859,6 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear) > > > > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); > > > > - if (status_clear) { > > - /* > > - * clear the interrupt status bit before unmask to avoid > > - * any erroneous interrupts that would have got latched > > - * when the interrupt is not in use. > > - */ > > - val = msm_readl_intr_status(pctrl, g); > > - val &= ~BIT(g->intr_status_bit); > > - msm_writel_intr_status(val, pctrl, g); > > - } > > - > Above change was clearing irq in .irq_enable callback which will do > clear + unmask from irq_startup() at the very end. > With your change, The problem is we have cleared the phantom irq much > earlier in __setup_irq() phase and in below case its still latched as > pending. > > 1. The client driver calls request_irq() => __setup_irq() > 2. __setup_irq() then first invokes irq_request_resources() => > msm_gpio_irq_reqres() => msm_pinmux_set_mux() => > msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq() > 3. __setup_irq() goes ahead and invokes __irq_set_trigger() => > msm_gpio_irq_set_type() > 4. __setup_irq() then invokes irq_startup() => gpiochip_irq_enable() => > msm_gpio_irq_enable() > > The phantom irq gets cleared in step (2) here, but with step (3) it gets > latched again and at the end of step (4) still get phantom irq. > This seems because as per below comment in driver, pasting the part > which has info, > /* > * The edge detection logic seems to have a problem where toggling the > RAW_STATUS_EN bit may > * cause the status bit to latch spuriously when there isn't any edge > */ > In step (3) msm_gpio_irq_set_type() touches the RAW_STATUS_EN making the > phantom irq pending again. > To resolve this, you will need to invoke msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq() > at the end of the msm_gpio_irq_set_type(). > > I would like Rajendra's (already in cc) review as well on above part. Ugh, so we need a clear in yet another place. Joy. OK, I will wait for Rajendra's comment but I can add similar code in msm_gpio_irq_enable(). > > val = msm_readl_intr_cfg(pctrl, g); > > val |= BIT(g->intr_raw_status_bit); > > val |= BIT(g->intr_enable_bit); > > @@ -815,14 +871,10 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear) > > > > static void msm_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d) > > { > > - struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > > - struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc); > > - > > if (d->parent_data) > > irq_chip_enable_parent(d); > > > > - if (!test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs)) > > - msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(d, true); > > + msm_gpio_irq_unmask(d); > > Still need the above if condition, the previous call > irq_chip_enable_parent() already enabled the IRQ at PDC and GIC, so only > go ahead to enable it at TLMM if there wasn't any parent. > > if (!test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs)) > msm_gpio_irq_unmask(d); Right. I'll fix it when I send the v3. Thanks! -Doug
Hi Doug, On 12/1/2020 3:14 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 2:33 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/603c691f-3614-d87b-075a-0889e9ffc453@codeaurora.org >> Please wait to land [1] before i confirm with HW team if this is indeed >> valid case. > Oh, oops. Somehow I thought your reply was in response to patch #3 in > the series, not #1. I responded to patch #1 in the series now to make > it clear to wait for you. > > >>> @@ -187,15 +217,26 @@ static int msm_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, >>> if (WARN_ON(i == g->nfuncs)) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> >>> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); >>> + disable_irq(irq); >>> >>> - val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); >>> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); >>> + oldval = val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); >>> val &= ~mask; >>> val |= i << g->mux_bit; >>> msm_writel_ctl(val, pctrl, g); >>> - >>> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); >>> >>> + /* >>> + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from GPIO mode since muxing to/from >>> + * the GPIO path can cause phantom edges. >>> + */ >>> + old_i = (oldval & mask) >> g->mux_bit; >>> + if (old_i != i && >>> + (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func || old_i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func)) >>> + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, group, irq); >>> + >> The phantom irq can come when switching to GPIO irq mode. so may be only >> check if (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func) { > Have you tested this experimentally? Yes > > I have experimentally tested this and I can actually see an interrupt > generated when I _leave_ GPIO as well as when I enter GPIO mode. If > you can't see this I can re-setup my test, but this was one of those > things that convinced me that the _transition_ is what was causing the > fake interrupt. > > I think my test CL <https://crrev.com/c/2556012/> can help you with > testing if you wish. > > >> even better if you can clear this unconditionally. > Why? It should only matter if we're going to/from GPIO mode. Probably i was not clear, the phantom irq should be cleared when switching gpio to gpio IRQ mode. When GPIO was used as Rx line in example QUP/UART use case, it can latch the phantom IRQ but as long as its IRQ is in disabled/masked state it doesn't matter. its only when the GPIO is again set to IRQ mode with set_mux callback, the phantom IRQ needs clear to start as clean. So we should check only for if (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func) then clear phantom IRQ. The same is case with .direction_output callback, when GPIO is used as output say as clock, need not clear any phantom IRQ, The reason is with every pulse of clock it can latch as pending IRQ in GIC_ISPEND as long as it stay as output mode/clock. its only when switching back GPIO from output direction to input & IRQ function, need to clear the phantom IRQ. so we do not require clear phantom irq in .direction_output callback. > > >>> @@ -456,32 +497,49 @@ static const struct pinconf_ops msm_pinconf_ops = { >>> static int msm_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) >>> { >>> const struct msm_pingroup *g; >>> + unsigned int irq = irq_find_mapping(chip->irq.domain, offset); >>> struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); >>> unsigned long flags; >>> + u32 oldval; >>> u32 val; >>> >>> g = &pctrl->soc->groups[offset]; >>> >>> + disable_irq(irq); >>> + >>> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); >>> >>> - val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); >>> + oldval = val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); >>> val &= ~BIT(g->oe_bit); >>> msm_writel_ctl(val, pctrl, g); >>> >>> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); >>> >>> + /* >>> + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from input mode since that can use >>> + * a phantom edge. >>> + */ >>> + if (oldval != val) >>> + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, offset, irq); >> same as above, can you clear this unconditionally. > Any reason why? If we didn't change anything then there's no reason > to go through all this extra code? > > >>> static int msm_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value) >>> { >>> const struct msm_pingroup *g; >>> + unsigned int irq = irq_find_mapping(chip->irq.domain, offset); >>> struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); >>> unsigned long flags; >>> + u32 oldval; >>> u32 val; >>> >>> g = &pctrl->soc->groups[offset]; >>> >>> + disable_irq(irq); >>> + >>> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); >>> >>> val = msm_readl_io(pctrl, g); >>> @@ -491,12 +549,21 @@ static int msm_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, in >>> val &= ~BIT(g->out_bit); >>> msm_writel_io(val, pctrl, g); >>> >>> - val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); >>> + oldval = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); >> should be, oldval = val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); >> >> otherwise val will carry invalid value. > Whoa! Good catch. How did I miss that and how did it not fail? I > will fix in a v3 but will wait until other questions are resolved > before sending. > > >>> val |= BIT(g->oe_bit); >>> msm_writel_ctl(val, pctrl, g); >>> >>> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); >>> >>> + /* >>> + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from input mode since that can use >>> + * a phantom edge. >>> + */ >>> + if (oldval != val) >>> + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, offset, irq); >> i don't see a reason to clear the edges when switching to output mode. >> >> can you remove the changes from .direction_output callback? > I haven't confirmed that this can glitch, however I did confirm that I > could glitch when muxing _away_ from GPIO mode. This makes me believe > that I could also glitch when muxing to an output. > > I can try to concoct a test for this if necessary. > > >>> @@ -792,17 +859,6 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear) >>> >>> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); >>> >>> - if (status_clear) { >>> - /* >>> - * clear the interrupt status bit before unmask to avoid >>> - * any erroneous interrupts that would have got latched >>> - * when the interrupt is not in use. >>> - */ >>> - val = msm_readl_intr_status(pctrl, g); >>> - val &= ~BIT(g->intr_status_bit); >>> - msm_writel_intr_status(val, pctrl, g); >>> - } >>> - >> Above change was clearing irq in .irq_enable callback which will do >> clear + unmask from irq_startup() at the very end. >> With your change, The problem is we have cleared the phantom irq much >> earlier in __setup_irq() phase and in below case its still latched as >> pending. >> >> 1. The client driver calls request_irq() => __setup_irq() >> 2. __setup_irq() then first invokes irq_request_resources() => >> msm_gpio_irq_reqres() => msm_pinmux_set_mux() => >> msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq() >> 3. __setup_irq() goes ahead and invokes __irq_set_trigger() => >> msm_gpio_irq_set_type() >> 4. __setup_irq() then invokes irq_startup() => gpiochip_irq_enable() => >> msm_gpio_irq_enable() >> >> The phantom irq gets cleared in step (2) here, but with step (3) it gets >> latched again and at the end of step (4) still get phantom irq. >> This seems because as per below comment in driver, pasting the part >> which has info, >> /* >> * The edge detection logic seems to have a problem where toggling the >> RAW_STATUS_EN bit may >> * cause the status bit to latch spuriously when there isn't any edge >> */ >> In step (3) msm_gpio_irq_set_type() touches the RAW_STATUS_EN making the >> phantom irq pending again. >> To resolve this, you will need to invoke msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq() >> at the end of the msm_gpio_irq_set_type(). >> >> I would like Rajendra's (already in cc) review as well on above part. > Ugh, so we need a clear in yet another place. Joy. OK, I will wait > for Rajendra's comment but I can add similar code in > msm_gpio_irq_enable(). As the clearing phantom irq code in msm_gpio_irq_enable() is moved to separate function msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(), it needs invoke from at the end of msm_gpio_irq_set_type() too. Thanks, Maulik > > >>> val = msm_readl_intr_cfg(pctrl, g); >>> val |= BIT(g->intr_raw_status_bit); >>> val |= BIT(g->intr_enable_bit); >>> @@ -815,14 +871,10 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear) >>> >>> static void msm_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d) >>> { >>> - struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); >>> - struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc); >>> - >>> if (d->parent_data) >>> irq_chip_enable_parent(d); >>> >>> - if (!test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs)) >>> - msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(d, true); >>> + msm_gpio_irq_unmask(d); >> Still need the above if condition, the previous call >> irq_chip_enable_parent() already enabled the IRQ at PDC and GIC, so only >> go ahead to enable it at TLMM if there wasn't any parent. >> >> if (!test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs)) >> msm_gpio_irq_unmask(d); > Right. I'll fix it when I send the v3. Thanks! > > -Doug
Hi, On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:22 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > >>> + /* > >>> + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from GPIO mode since muxing to/from > >>> + * the GPIO path can cause phantom edges. > >>> + */ > >>> + old_i = (oldval & mask) >> g->mux_bit; > >>> + if (old_i != i && > >>> + (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func || old_i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func)) > >>> + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, group, irq); > >>> + > >> The phantom irq can come when switching to GPIO irq mode. so may be only > >> check if (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func) { > > Have you tested this experimentally? > Yes Yes means that you tried switching away from GPIO mode and you couldn't get a phantom interrupt? OK, I'll re-test then. I'll test on the Chrome OS kernel tree since that's easiest for me, but I can test on mainline if you think it would make a difference... 1. Pick <https://crrev.com/c/2556012> and put that kernel on the device. 2. In Cr50 console, make the WP line low with: wp enable 3. In AP console do: echo bogus > /sys/module/gpio_keys/parameters/doug_test 4. See bogus interrupt: localhost ~ # echo bogus > /sys/module/gpio_keys/parameters/doug_test [ 62.006346] DOUG: selecting state bogus [ 62.011813] DOUG: ret 0 [ 62.011875] DOUG: in dual edge parent: hwirq=66, type=1 [ 62.020300] DOUG: gpio_keys_gpio_isr Can you try replicating again? > > I have experimentally tested this and I can actually see an interrupt > > generated when I _leave_ GPIO as well as when I enter GPIO mode. If > > you can't see this I can re-setup my test, but this was one of those > > things that convinced me that the _transition_ is what was causing the > > fake interrupt. > > > > I think my test CL <https://crrev.com/c/2556012/> can help you with > > testing if you wish. > > > > > >> even better if you can clear this unconditionally. > > Why? It should only matter if we're going to/from GPIO mode. > > Probably i was not clear, the phantom irq should be cleared when > switching gpio to gpio IRQ mode. > > When GPIO was used as Rx line in example QUP/UART use case, it can latch > the phantom IRQ This is where I disagree with you. I don't think the interrupt is latching while it's used as an Rx line. I think it's the pinmux change that introduces an phantom interrupt. Specifically, with the same test patch above, AKA <https://crrev.com/c/2556012>, I can do this: 1. On AP: echo bogus > /sys/module/gpio_keys/parameters/doug_test 2. On Cr50 console: wp disable wp enable wp disable wp enable wp disable wp enable 3. Go back and check the AP and see that no interrupts fired. Said another way: when we're muxed away the interrupts aren't getting latched. It's the act of changing the mux that causes the phantom interrupts. > but as long as its IRQ is in disabled/masked state it > doesn't matter. ...but there's no requirement that someone would need to disable/mask an interrupt while switching the muxing, is there? So it does matter. > its only when the GPIO is again set to IRQ mode with set_mux callback, > the phantom IRQ needs clear to start as clean. > > So we should check only for if (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func) then clear > phantom IRQ. > > The same is case with .direction_output callback, when GPIO is used as > output say as clock, need not clear any phantom IRQ, > > The reason is with every pulse of clock it can latch as pending IRQ in > GIC_ISPEND as long as it stay as output mode/clock. > > its only when switching back GPIO from output direction to input & IRQ > function, need to clear the phantom IRQ. > > so we do not require clear phantom irq in .direction_output callback. I think all the above explanation is with the model that the interrupt detection logic is still happening even when muxed away. I don't believe that's true. Please run my test patch or code up something similar yourself. > >> In step (3) msm_gpio_irq_set_type() touches the RAW_STATUS_EN making the > >> phantom irq pending again. > >> To resolve this, you will need to invoke msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq() > >> at the end of the msm_gpio_irq_set_type(). > >> > >> I would like Rajendra's (already in cc) review as well on above part. > > Ugh, so we need a clear in yet another place. Joy. OK, I will wait > > for Rajendra's comment but I can add similar code in > > msm_gpio_irq_enable(). > > As the clearing phantom irq code in msm_gpio_irq_enable() is moved to > separate function msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(), it needs invoke from > at the end of msm_gpio_irq_set_type() too. Seems reasonable to me. I'll include this in my next spin. Still waiting for us to agree on some of the points above before spinning, though. -Doug
Hi Doug, On 12/4/2020 2:34 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:22 AM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>>>> + /* >>>>> + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from GPIO mode since muxing to/from >>>>> + * the GPIO path can cause phantom edges. >>>>> + */ >>>>> + old_i = (oldval & mask) >> g->mux_bit; >>>>> + if (old_i != i && >>>>> + (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func || old_i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func)) >>>>> + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, group, irq); >>>>> + >>>> The phantom irq can come when switching to GPIO irq mode. so may be only >>>> check if (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func) { >>> Have you tested this experimentally? >> Yes > Yes means that you tried switching away from GPIO mode and you > couldn't get a phantom interrupt? OK, I'll re-test then. > > I'll test on the Chrome OS kernel tree since that's easiest for me, > but I can test on mainline if you think it would make a difference... > > 1. Pick <https://crrev.com/c/2556012> and put that kernel on the device. > > 2. In Cr50 console, make the WP line low with: > wp enable > > 3. In AP console do: > echo bogus > /sys/module/gpio_keys/parameters/doug_test > > 4. See bogus interrupt: > > localhost ~ # echo bogus > /sys/module/gpio_keys/parameters/doug_test > [ 62.006346] DOUG: selecting state bogus > [ 62.011813] DOUG: ret 0 > [ 62.011875] DOUG: in dual edge parent: hwirq=66, type=1 > [ 62.020300] DOUG: gpio_keys_gpio_isr > > Can you try replicating again? > > >>> I have experimentally tested this and I can actually see an interrupt >>> generated when I _leave_ GPIO as well as when I enter GPIO mode. If >>> you can't see this I can re-setup my test, but this was one of those >>> things that convinced me that the _transition_ is what was causing the >>> fake interrupt. >>> >>> I think my test CL <https://crrev.com/c/2556012/> can help you with >>> testing if you wish. >>> >>> >>>> even better if you can clear this unconditionally. >>> Why? It should only matter if we're going to/from GPIO mode. >> Probably i was not clear, the phantom irq should be cleared when >> switching gpio to gpio IRQ mode. >> >> When GPIO was used as Rx line in example QUP/UART use case, it can latch >> the phantom IRQ > This is where I disagree with you. I don't think the interrupt is > latching while it's used as an Rx line. I think it's the pinmux > change that introduces an phantom interrupt. > > Specifically, with the same test patch above, AKA > <https://crrev.com/c/2556012>, I can do this: > > 1. On AP: > echo bogus > /sys/module/gpio_keys/parameters/doug_test > > 2. On Cr50 console: > wp disable > wp enable > wp disable > wp enable > wp disable > wp enable > > 3. Go back and check the AP and see that no interrupts fired. > > Said another way: when we're muxed away the interrupts aren't getting > latched. It's the act of changing the mux that causes the phantom > interrupts. > > >> but as long as its IRQ is in disabled/masked state it >> doesn't matter. > ...but there's no requirement that someone would need to disable/mask > an interrupt while switching the muxing, is there? So it does matter. > > >> its only when the GPIO is again set to IRQ mode with set_mux callback, >> the phantom IRQ needs clear to start as clean. >> >> So we should check only for if (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func) then clear >> phantom IRQ. >> >> The same is case with .direction_output callback, when GPIO is used as >> output say as clock, need not clear any phantom IRQ, >> >> The reason is with every pulse of clock it can latch as pending IRQ in >> GIC_ISPEND as long as it stay as output mode/clock. >> >> its only when switching back GPIO from output direction to input & IRQ >> function, need to clear the phantom IRQ. >> >> so we do not require clear phantom irq in .direction_output callback. > I think all the above explanation is with the model that the interrupt > detection logic is still happening even when muxed away. I don't > believe that's true. Its not the interrupt detection logic that is still happening when muxed away, but the GPIO line is routed to GIC from PDC. The GPIO line get forwarded when the system is active/out of system level low power mode to GIC irrespective of whether GPIO is used as interrupt or not. Due to this it can still latch the IRQ at GIC after switching to lets say Rx mode, whenever the line has any data recive, the line state toggles can be latched as error interrupt at GIC. As the interrupt is in disabled state it won't be sent to CPU. Its only when the driver chooses to switch back to interrupt mode we want to clear the error interrupt latched to start as clean. same is the case when used as output direction. Hope above is clear. Thanks, Maulik > Please run my test patch or code up something > similar yourself. > > >>>> In step (3) msm_gpio_irq_set_type() touches the RAW_STATUS_EN making the >>>> phantom irq pending again. >>>> To resolve this, you will need to invoke msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq() >>>> at the end of the msm_gpio_irq_set_type(). >>>> >>>> I would like Rajendra's (already in cc) review as well on above part. >>> Ugh, so we need a clear in yet another place. Joy. OK, I will wait >>> for Rajendra's comment but I can add similar code in >>> msm_gpio_irq_enable(). >> As the clearing phantom irq code in msm_gpio_irq_enable() is moved to >> separate function msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(), it needs invoke from >> at the end of msm_gpio_irq_set_type() too. > Seems reasonable to me. I'll include this in my next spin. Still > waiting for us to agree on some of the points above before spinning, > though. > > -Doug
Hi, On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:54 PM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > >> but as long as its IRQ is in disabled/masked state it > >> doesn't matter. > > ...but there's no requirement that someone would need to disable/mask > > an interrupt while switching the muxing, is there? So it does matter. > > > > > >> its only when the GPIO is again set to IRQ mode with set_mux callback, > >> the phantom IRQ needs clear to start as clean. > >> > >> So we should check only for if (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func) then clear > >> phantom IRQ. > >> > >> The same is case with .direction_output callback, when GPIO is used as > >> output say as clock, need not clear any phantom IRQ, > >> > >> The reason is with every pulse of clock it can latch as pending IRQ in > >> GIC_ISPEND as long as it stay as output mode/clock. > >> > >> its only when switching back GPIO from output direction to input & IRQ > >> function, need to clear the phantom IRQ. > >> > >> so we do not require clear phantom irq in .direction_output callback. > > I think all the above explanation is with the model that the interrupt > > detection logic is still happening even when muxed away. I don't > > believe that's true. > Its not the interrupt detection logic that is still happening when muxed > away, but the GPIO line is routed to GIC from PDC. > The GPIO line get forwarded when the system is active/out of system > level low power mode to GIC irrespective of whether GPIO is used as > interrupt or not. > Due to this it can still latch the IRQ at GIC after switching to lets > say Rx mode, whenever the line has any data recive, the line state > toggles can be latched as error interrupt at GIC. From my tests, though, I strongly believe that the pin is only visible to the PDC if it's muxed as GPIO. Specifically, in my tests I did this (with all my patches applied so there were no phantom interrupts when remuxing): a) Muxed the pin away from GPIO to special function, but _didn't_ mask the interrupt. b) Toggled the line a whole bunch. These caused no interrupts at all. c) Muxed back to GPIO. To me this is quite strong evidence that the muxing is "earlier" in the path than the connection to the PDC. In other words, if you change the mux away from GPIO then the PDC stops seeing it and thus the GIC also stops seeing it. The GIC can't latch what it can't see. This means while you're in "Rx mode" it can't be latched. OK, so just in case this somehow only happens in S3, I also tried this (with my patch from https://crrev.com/c/2556012): a) Muxed away from GPIO ("bogus" pinmux) b) Enter S3. c) Toggle the GPIO a whole bunch ("wp enable / wp disable" on Cr50). d) Wake from S3. e) Check to see if the interrupt fired a bunch. It didn't fire at all In my test code the interrupt is not masked, only muxed away. That means that if, somehow, the PDC was still observing it then we'd see the interrupt fire. We don't. Unless I messed up in my tests (always possible, though by this point I've run them a number of times) then it still feels like your mental model is wrong, or it's always possible I'm still misunderstanding your model. Regardless, rather than trying to re-explain your model can you please confirm that you've written test code to confirm your mental model? If so, can you please provide this test code? I've provided several test patches proving out my mental model. > As the interrupt is in disabled state it won't be sent to CPU. > Its only when the driver chooses to switch back to interrupt mode we > want to clear the error interrupt latched to start as clean. same is the > case when used as output direction. > > Hope above is clear. Unfortunately, it's still not. :( Can I convince you to provide a test patch and a set of steps that will demonstrate the problem you're worried about? Specifically: a) Maybe you're talking about the initial switch from a plain GPIO input to making it an interrupt for the first time? Are you worried about a phantom interrupt in this case? After patch #1 I think we're safe because pdc_gic_set_type() will always clear the interrupt, right? b) You say "switch back to interrupt mode". Are you imagining that a driver does something like this: request_irq(); ... free_irq(); ... request_irq(); If you're worried about that then we can implement irq_shutdown() for PDC and then make sure we clear on the first enable after a shutdown, I guess? c) Maybe when you say "switch back to interrupt mode" you mean something else? If you are talking about muxing away and then muxing back then I think we already have this covered. If you are talking about masking/unmasking then the whole point is that we _do_ want interrupts latched while masked, right? OK, I'm going to send out a v3 just to get the already-identified problems fixed and also to allow landing of patch #1 in the series, which I think is all agreed upon. My request to you is that if you think my code misses a specific case to provide some test patches to demonstrate that case. -Doug
Hi Doug, On 12/10/2020 6:13 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:54 PM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote: >>>> but as long as its IRQ is in disabled/masked state it >>>> doesn't matter. >>> ...but there's no requirement that someone would need to disable/mask >>> an interrupt while switching the muxing, is there? So it does matter. >>> >>> >>>> its only when the GPIO is again set to IRQ mode with set_mux callback, >>>> the phantom IRQ needs clear to start as clean. >>>> >>>> So we should check only for if (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func) then clear >>>> phantom IRQ. >>>> >>>> The same is case with .direction_output callback, when GPIO is used as >>>> output say as clock, need not clear any phantom IRQ, >>>> >>>> The reason is with every pulse of clock it can latch as pending IRQ in >>>> GIC_ISPEND as long as it stay as output mode/clock. >>>> >>>> its only when switching back GPIO from output direction to input & IRQ >>>> function, need to clear the phantom IRQ. >>>> >>>> so we do not require clear phantom irq in .direction_output callback. >>> I think all the above explanation is with the model that the interrupt >>> detection logic is still happening even when muxed away. I don't >>> believe that's true. >> Its not the interrupt detection logic that is still happening when muxed >> away, but the GPIO line is routed to GIC from PDC. >> The GPIO line get forwarded when the system is active/out of system >> level low power mode to GIC irrespective of whether GPIO is used as >> interrupt or not. >> Due to this it can still latch the IRQ at GIC after switching to lets >> say Rx mode, whenever the line has any data recive, the line state >> toggles can be latched as error interrupt at GIC. > From my tests, though, I strongly believe that the pin is only visible > to the PDC if it's muxed as GPIO. Specifically, in my tests I did > this (with all my patches applied so there were no phantom interrupts > when remuxing): > > a) Muxed the pin away from GPIO to special function, but _didn't_ mask > the interrupt. > > b) Toggled the line a whole bunch. These caused no interrupts at all. > > c) Muxed back to GPIO. > > To me this is quite strong evidence that the muxing is "earlier" in > the path than the connection to the PDC. In other words, if you > change the mux away from GPIO then the PDC stops seeing it and thus > the GIC also stops seeing it. The GIC can't latch what it can't see. > This means while you're in "Rx mode" it can't be latched. > > > OK, so just in case this somehow only happens in S3, I also tried this > (with my patch from https://crrev.com/c/2556012): > > a) Muxed away from GPIO ("bogus" pinmux) > > b) Enter S3. > > c) Toggle the GPIO a whole bunch ("wp enable / wp disable" on Cr50). > > d) Wake from S3. > > e) Check to see if the interrupt fired a bunch. It didn't fire at all > > > In my test code the interrupt is not masked, only muxed away. That > means that if, somehow, the PDC was still observing it then we'd see > the interrupt fire. We don't. > > > Unless I messed up in my tests (always possible, though by this point > I've run them a number of times) then it still feels like your mental > model is wrong, or it's always possible I'm still misunderstanding > your model. Regardless, rather than trying to re-explain your model > can you please confirm that you've written test code to confirm your > mental model? If so, can you please provide this test code? I've > provided several test patches proving out my mental model. Its not a mental model, its how the line is connected to GIC. GPIO follows the path, TLMM to PDC to GIC. PDC donot know if the line is muxed away from GPIO to some other function, so it can stop forwarding to GIC. I have slightly modified your test case (see at https://crrev.com/c/2584729) which is as per what i used in my testing. Here is what i am doing, setting GPIO to a fixed function (function 2 here) Note that function 0 is the GPIO (interrupt mode). 1) Pull up the GPIO in function 2 2) Pull down the GPIO in function 2 Repeat above steps, and you will see fake interrupt every time pull down/up. This proves that if you mux away from GPIO then still PDC sees the line and can latch the interrupt at GIC. Thanks, Maulik >> As the interrupt is in disabled state it won't be sent to CPU. >> Its only when the driver chooses to switch back to interrupt mode we >> want to clear the error interrupt latched to start as clean. same is the >> case when used as output direction. >> >> Hope above is clear. > Unfortunately, it's still not. :( Can I convince you to provide a > test patch and a set of steps that will demonstrate the problem you're > worried about? Specifically: > > a) Maybe you're talking about the initial switch from a plain GPIO > input to making it an interrupt for the first time? Are you worried > about a phantom interrupt in this case? After patch #1 I think we're > safe because pdc_gic_set_type() will always clear the interrupt, > right? > > > b) You say "switch back to interrupt mode". Are you imagining that a > driver does something like this: > > request_irq(); > ... > free_irq(); > ... > request_irq(); > > If you're worried about that then we can implement irq_shutdown() for > PDC and then make sure we clear on the first enable after a shutdown, > I guess? > > > c) Maybe when you say "switch back to interrupt mode" you mean > something else? If you are talking about muxing away and then muxing > back then I think we already have this covered. If you are talking > about masking/unmasking then the whole point is that we _do_ want > interrupts latched while masked, right? > > > OK, I'm going to send out a v3 just to get the already-identified > problems fixed and also to allow landing of patch #1 in the series, > which I think is all agreed upon. My request to you is that if you > think my code misses a specific case to provide some test patches to > demonstrate that case. > > > -Doug -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Hi, On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:07 PM Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > I have slightly modified your test case (see at > https://crrev.com/c/2584729) which is as per what i used in my testing. > > Here is what i am doing, setting GPIO to a fixed function (function 2 here) > Note that function 0 is the GPIO (interrupt mode). > > 1) Pull up the GPIO in function 2 > 2) Pull down the GPIO in function 2 > > Repeat above steps, and you will see fake interrupt every time pull down/up. > This proves that if you mux away from GPIO then still PDC sees the line > and can latch the interrupt at GIC. Ah, super useful example! Thanks! Yes, I can replicate your results. ...but this seems to contradict my other test. Ah, dang, I think I see the problem with my original test. The important difference is that in your test you used the alternate function "mi2s_2" and in mine I used "qspi_data". When I selected "qspi_data" it must have been actively driving the pin and _that's_ why I couldn't affect it. When I change my test to use "mi2s_2" then my toggles via "wp enable" and "wp disable" cause phantom interrupts. That confirms what you're saying: the PDC _can_ see the twiddles even when muxed away. Presumably the active driving my "qspi_data" is also what caused my phantom glitches. So, as you said, that means my mental model is totally wrong here. Wow, if I had known that earlier I would have saved a lot of time. That'll learn me... OK, v4 being posted and you can see if that handles all the cases? -Doug
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c index 588df91274e2..89e9579d076d 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c @@ -166,14 +166,44 @@ static int msm_get_function_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, return 0; } +static void msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl, + unsigned int group, + unsigned int irq) +{ + struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq); + const struct msm_pingroup *g; + unsigned long flags; + u32 val; + + if (!d) + return; + + if (d->parent_data && test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs)) { + irq_chip_set_parent_state(d, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, false); + return; + } + + g = &pctrl->soc->groups[group]; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); + val = msm_readl_intr_status(pctrl, g); + val &= ~BIT(g->intr_status_bit); + msm_writel_intr_status(val, pctrl, g); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); +} + static int msm_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned function, unsigned group) { struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); + struct gpio_chip *gc = &pctrl->chip; + unsigned int irq = irq_find_mapping(gc->irq.domain, group); const struct msm_pingroup *g; unsigned long flags; u32 val, mask; + u32 oldval; + u32 old_i; int i; g = &pctrl->soc->groups[group]; @@ -187,15 +217,26 @@ static int msm_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, if (WARN_ON(i == g->nfuncs)) return -EINVAL; - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); + disable_irq(irq); - val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); + oldval = val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); val &= ~mask; val |= i << g->mux_bit; msm_writel_ctl(val, pctrl, g); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); + /* + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from GPIO mode since muxing to/from + * the GPIO path can cause phantom edges. + */ + old_i = (oldval & mask) >> g->mux_bit; + if (old_i != i && + (i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func || old_i == pctrl->soc->gpio_func)) + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, group, irq); + + enable_irq(irq); + return 0; } @@ -456,32 +497,49 @@ static const struct pinconf_ops msm_pinconf_ops = { static int msm_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) { const struct msm_pingroup *g; + unsigned int irq = irq_find_mapping(chip->irq.domain, offset); struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); unsigned long flags; + u32 oldval; u32 val; g = &pctrl->soc->groups[offset]; + disable_irq(irq); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); - val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); + oldval = val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); val &= ~BIT(g->oe_bit); msm_writel_ctl(val, pctrl, g); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); + /* + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from input mode since that can use + * a phantom edge. + */ + if (oldval != val) + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, offset, irq); + + enable_irq(irq); + return 0; } static int msm_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value) { const struct msm_pingroup *g; + unsigned int irq = irq_find_mapping(chip->irq.domain, offset); struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); unsigned long flags; + u32 oldval; u32 val; g = &pctrl->soc->groups[offset]; + disable_irq(irq); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); val = msm_readl_io(pctrl, g); @@ -491,12 +549,21 @@ static int msm_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, in val &= ~BIT(g->out_bit); msm_writel_io(val, pctrl, g); - val = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); + oldval = msm_readl_ctl(pctrl, g); val |= BIT(g->oe_bit); msm_writel_ctl(val, pctrl, g); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); + /* + * Clear IRQs if switching to/from input mode since that can use + * a phantom edge. + */ + if (oldval != val) + msm_pinctrl_clear_pending_irq(pctrl, offset, irq); + + enable_irq(irq); + return 0; } @@ -774,7 +841,7 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d) raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); } -static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear) +static void msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d) { struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc); @@ -792,17 +859,6 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); - if (status_clear) { - /* - * clear the interrupt status bit before unmask to avoid - * any erroneous interrupts that would have got latched - * when the interrupt is not in use. - */ - val = msm_readl_intr_status(pctrl, g); - val &= ~BIT(g->intr_status_bit); - msm_writel_intr_status(val, pctrl, g); - } - val = msm_readl_intr_cfg(pctrl, g); val |= BIT(g->intr_raw_status_bit); val |= BIT(g->intr_enable_bit); @@ -815,14 +871,10 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool status_clear) static void msm_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d) { - struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); - struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc); - if (d->parent_data) irq_chip_enable_parent(d); - if (!test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs)) - msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(d, true); + msm_gpio_irq_unmask(d); } static void msm_gpio_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d) @@ -837,11 +889,6 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d) msm_gpio_irq_mask(d); } -static void msm_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d) -{ - msm_gpio_irq_clear_unmask(d, false); -} - /** * msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_parent() - Prime next edge for IRQs handled by parent. * @d: The irq dta. @@ -1097,19 +1144,6 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d) ret = -EINVAL; goto out; } - - /* - * Clear the interrupt that may be pending before we enable - * the line. - * This is especially a problem with the GPIOs routed to the - * PDC. These GPIOs are direct-connect interrupts to the GIC. - * Disabling the interrupt line at the PDC does not prevent - * the interrupt from being latched at the GIC. The state at - * GIC needs to be cleared before enabling. - */ - if (d->parent_data && test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs)) - irq_chip_set_parent_state(d, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, 0); - return 0; out: module_put(gc->owner);
Conceptually, we can envision the input on Qualcomm SoCs to pass through a bunch of blocks between coming into the chip and becoming a GPIO interrupt. From guessing and running a handful of tests, I believe that we can represent the state of the world with a drawing that looks something like this: +-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+ | INPUT | --> | PINMUX | | IS_INPUT | +-----------------+ | | --> | | | output bogus (?)| | output bogus (?)| | if not muxed | | if input disab. | +-----------------+ +-----------------+ | +---------------------------------------------------+--> to PDC | V +-----------------+ +-----------------+ +-----------------+ | INTR RAW ENABLE | | DETECTION LOGIC | | STATUS REGISTER | | | | | | | | output bogus (?)| --> | maybe handles | | latches inputs | | if disabled | | polarity diffs | --> | that are high | +-----------------+ | | | | | maybe debounces | | write 1 to clr | | level irqs | +-----------------+ +-----------------+ | | +---------------------------------------------------+ | V +-----------------+ | ENABLE | | | +-----------------+ | nothing passes | --> | SUMMARY IRQ | | through if | +-----------------+ | disabled | +-----------------+ The above might not be 100% exact, but for the purpose of this discussion, the point is that there are a whole bunch of gates and transformations on the input before it gets to the circuitry that generates interrupts. As you might guess, if you reconfigure one of the gates in the above diagram while the system is configured to detect interrupts things get a little wacky. Specifically it appears that if you gate the input at any step it can cause various glitches in the later steps because they are still paying attention to their input but their input isn't really sane anymore. I did some poking and I found that I could generate bogus interrupts in the system both when muxing away from GPIO mode and also when muxing back to GPIO mode. When configured to use the PDC path for generating interrupts I found that if the external input on the GPIO was low that I'd get what looked like a rising edge when unmuxing and a falling edge when muxing. When configured away from the PDC path I got slightly different glitch interrupts when changing muxing. These glitches when remuxing matter in reality, not just in theory. To be concrete, let's take the special "wakeup_irq" in qcom_geni_serial.c as an example. In sc7180-trogdor.dtsi we configure the uart3 to have two pinctrl states, sleep and default, and mux between the two during runtime PM and system suspend (see geni_se_resources_{on,off}() for more details). The difference between the sleep and default state is that the RX pin is muxed to a GPIO during sleep and muxed to the UART otherwise. When we switch between these two states we can generate the glitches talked about above because we're configured to look for edges but the transition from the gated input (which is bogus) to the real input can look like an edge. Historically the UART case above was handled by the fact that the "enable" function in the MSM GPIO driver did an "unmask and clear". This relied on the fact that the system happens to have the interrupt disabled until suspend time and that it would enable it after the pinmux change happened, thus clearing the interrupt. The historical solution, however, had a few problems. The first problem (that nobody seemed to have tripped) is that we can still get bogus interrupts if we remux when the interrupt isn't disabled during the muxing and re-enabled after. The second problem is that it violates how I believe that the interrupt enable path is supposed to work. In Linux, if a driver does disable_irq() and later does enable_irq() on its interrupt, I believe it's expecting these properties: * If an interrupt was pending when the driver disabled then it will still be pending after the driver re-enables. * If an edge-triggered interrupt comes in while an interrupt is disabled it should assert when the interrupt is re-enabled. If you think that the above sounds a lot like the disable_irq() and enable_irq() are supposed to be masking/unmasking the interrupt instead of disabling/enabling it then you've made an astute observation. Specifically when talking about interrupts, "mask" usually means to stop posting interrupts but keep tracking them and "disable" means to fully shut off interrupt detection. It's unfortunate that this is so confusing, but presumably this is all the way it is for historical reasons. Perhaps more confusing than the above is that, even though clients of IRQs themselves don't have a way to request mask/unmask vs. disable/enable calls, IRQ chips themselves can implement both. ...and yet more confusing is that if an IRQ chip implements disable/enable then they will be called when a client driver calls disable_irq() / enable_irq(). It does feel like some of the above could be cleared up. However, without any other core interrupt changes it should be clear that when an IRQ chip gets a request to "disable" an IRQ that it has to treat it like a mask of that IRQ. In any case, after that long interlude you can see that the "unmask and clear" can break things. Maulik tried to fix it so that we no longer did "unmask and clear" in commit 71266d9d3936 ("pinctrl: qcom: Move clearing pending IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback"), but it didn't work for two reasons: * It only tried to address the problem for interrupts that had parents (like the PDC). * It regressed the problem that the original clearing was trying to solve. I think we can safely assume that if someone muxes a pin to be something other than a GPIO and then muxes it back that we can clear any interrupts that were pending on it without violating any assumptions that client drivers are making. Presumably the client drivers are intentionally remuxing the pin away from a dedicated purpose to be a plain GPIO so they don't care what the pin state was before the mux switch and they don't expect to see the pin change level during this switch. Let's move the clearing of the IRQ to the pin muxing routine so that we'll clear a pending IRQ if we're muxing from some non-GPIO mode to a GPIO mode. Fixes: 71266d9d3936 ("pinctrl: qcom: Move clearing pending IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> --- This patch depends on #2 in the series, but not #1. #1 can land on its own and then #2/#3 can land together even without #1. The only reason patch #1 and #2/#3 are together in one series is because they address similar issues. IMPORTANT NOTE: Maulik has requested to wait for his Ack on patch #3 before landing [1]. As per above, this need not stop patch #1 from landing. I have done most of this patch testing on the Chrome OS 5.4 kernel tree (with many backports) but have sanity checked it on mainline. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/603c691f-3614-d87b-075a-0889e9ffc453@codeaurora.org Changes in v2: - 0 => false - If skip_wake_irqs, don't need to clear normal intr. - Add comment about glitches in both output and input. drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)