Message ID | 20201215142228.1847161-1-trix@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | atm: ambassador: remove h from printk format specifier | expand |
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 trix@redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > > See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst. > h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> That's for new code I assume? What's the harm in leaving this ancient code be? > diff --git a/drivers/atm/ambassador.c b/drivers/atm/ambassador.c > index c039b8a4fefe..6b0fff8c0141 100644 > --- a/drivers/atm/ambassador.c > +++ b/drivers/atm/ambassador.c > @@ -2169,7 +2169,7 @@ static void setup_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *pci_dev) > pci_lat = (lat < MIN_PCI_LATENCY) ? MIN_PCI_LATENCY : lat; > > if (lat != pci_lat) { > - PRINTK (KERN_INFO, "Changing PCI latency timer from %hu to %hu", > + PRINTK (KERN_INFO, "Changing PCI latency timer from %u to %u", > lat, pci_lat); > pci_write_config_byte(pci_dev, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, pci_lat); > } > @@ -2300,7 +2300,7 @@ static void __init amb_check_args (void) { > unsigned int max_rx_size; > > #ifdef DEBUG_AMBASSADOR > - PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %hx", debug &= DBG_MASK); > + PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %x", debug &= DBG_MASK); > #else > if (debug) > PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "no debugging support");
On 12/16/20 4:45 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 trix@redhat.com wrote: >> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> >> >> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst. >> h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > That's for new code I assume? > > What's the harm in leaving this ancient code be? This change is part of a tree wide cleanup. drivers/atm status is listed as Maintained in MAINTAINERS so changes like this should be ok. Should drivers/atm status be changed? Tom > >> diff --git a/drivers/atm/ambassador.c b/drivers/atm/ambassador.c >> index c039b8a4fefe..6b0fff8c0141 100644 >> --- a/drivers/atm/ambassador.c >> +++ b/drivers/atm/ambassador.c >> @@ -2169,7 +2169,7 @@ static void setup_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *pci_dev) >> pci_lat = (lat < MIN_PCI_LATENCY) ? MIN_PCI_LATENCY : lat; >> >> if (lat != pci_lat) { >> - PRINTK (KERN_INFO, "Changing PCI latency timer from %hu to %hu", >> + PRINTK (KERN_INFO, "Changing PCI latency timer from %u to %u", >> lat, pci_lat); >> pci_write_config_byte(pci_dev, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, pci_lat); >> } >> @@ -2300,7 +2300,7 @@ static void __init amb_check_args (void) { >> unsigned int max_rx_size; >> >> #ifdef DEBUG_AMBASSADOR >> - PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %hx", debug &= DBG_MASK); >> + PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %x", debug &= DBG_MASK); >> #else >> if (debug) >> PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "no debugging support");
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:17:24 -0800 Tom Rix wrote: > On 12/16/20 4:45 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 trix@redhat.com wrote: > >> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > >> > >> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst. > >> h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > > That's for new code I assume? > > > > What's the harm in leaving this ancient code be? > > This change is part of a tree wide cleanup. What's the purpose of the "clean up"? Why is it making the code better? This is a quote from your change: - PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %hx", debug &= DBG_MASK); + PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %x", debug &= DBG_MASK); Are you sure that the use of %hx is the worst part of that line? > drivers/atm status is listed as Maintained in MAINTAINERS so changes > like this should be ok. > > Should drivers/atm status be changed? Up to Chas, but AFAIU we're probably only a few years away from ATM as a whole walking into the light. So IMHO "Obsolete" would be justified.
On 12/17/20 9:28 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:17:24 -0800 Tom Rix wrote: >> On 12/16/20 4:45 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 trix@redhat.com wrote: >>>> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> >>>> >>>> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst. >>>> h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> >>> That's for new code I assume? >>> >>> What's the harm in leaving this ancient code be? >> This change is part of a tree wide cleanup. > What's the purpose of the "clean up"? Why is it making the code better? > > This is a quote from your change: > > - PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %hx", debug &= DBG_MASK); > + PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %x", debug &= DBG_MASK); > > Are you sure that the use of %hx is the worst part of that line? In this case, it means this bit of code is compliant with the %h checker in checkpatch. why you are seeing this change for %hx and not the horrible debug &= or the old PRINTK macro is because the change was mechanical. leveraging the clang build and a special fixit for %h, an allyesconfig for x86_64 cleans this problem from most of the tree in about an hour. atm/ was just one of the places it hit, there are about 100 more. If you want the debug &= fixed, i can do that. The macro is a treewide problem and i can add that to the treewide cleanups i am planning. Tom > >> drivers/atm status is listed as Maintained in MAINTAINERS so changes >> like this should be ok. >> >> Should drivers/atm status be changed? > Up to Chas, but AFAIU we're probably only a few years away from ATM as > a whole walking into the light. So IMHO "Obsolete" would be justified. >
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:03:07 -0800 Tom Rix wrote: > On 12/17/20 9:28 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:17:24 -0800 Tom Rix wrote: > >> On 12/16/20 4:45 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > >>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 trix@redhat.com wrote: > >>>> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > >>>> > >>>> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst. > >>>> h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > >>> That's for new code I assume? > >>> > >>> What's the harm in leaving this ancient code be? > >> This change is part of a tree wide cleanup. > > What's the purpose of the "clean up"? Why is it making the code better? > > > > This is a quote from your change: > > > > - PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %hx", debug &= DBG_MASK); > > + PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %x", debug &= DBG_MASK); > > > > Are you sure that the use of %hx is the worst part of that line? > > In this case, it means this bit of code is compliant with the %h checker in checkpatch. > > why you are seeing this change for %hx and not the horrible debug &= or the old PRINTK macro is because the change was mechanical. > > leveraging the clang build and a special fixit for %h, an allyesconfig for x86_64 cleans this problem from most of the tree in about an hour. atm/ was just one of the places it hit, there are about 100 more. > > If you want the debug &= fixed, i can do that. No, the opposite of that. I would like to see fewer patches touching prehistoric code for little to no gain :( > The macro is a treewide problem and i can add that to the treewide cleanups i am planning.
diff --git a/drivers/atm/ambassador.c b/drivers/atm/ambassador.c index c039b8a4fefe..6b0fff8c0141 100644 --- a/drivers/atm/ambassador.c +++ b/drivers/atm/ambassador.c @@ -2169,7 +2169,7 @@ static void setup_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *pci_dev) pci_lat = (lat < MIN_PCI_LATENCY) ? MIN_PCI_LATENCY : lat; if (lat != pci_lat) { - PRINTK (KERN_INFO, "Changing PCI latency timer from %hu to %hu", + PRINTK (KERN_INFO, "Changing PCI latency timer from %u to %u", lat, pci_lat); pci_write_config_byte(pci_dev, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, pci_lat); } @@ -2300,7 +2300,7 @@ static void __init amb_check_args (void) { unsigned int max_rx_size; #ifdef DEBUG_AMBASSADOR - PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %hx", debug &= DBG_MASK); + PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %x", debug &= DBG_MASK); #else if (debug) PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "no debugging support");