diff mbox series

[net] selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1d: Fix vxlan ecn decapsulate value

Message ID 20210319143314.2731608-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series [net] selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1d: Fix vxlan ecn decapsulate value | expand

Commit Message

Hangbin Liu March 19, 2021, 2:33 p.m. UTC
The ECN bit defines ECT(1) = 1, ECT(0) = 2. So inner 0x02 + outer 0x01
should be inner ECT(0) + outer ECT(1). Based on the description of
__INET_ECN_decapsulate, the final decapsulate value should be
ECT(1). So fix the test expect value to 0x01.

Before the fix:
TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x02                                 [FAIL]
        Expected to capture 10 packets, got 0.

After the fix:
TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x01                                 [ OK ]

Fixes: a0b61f3d8ebf ("selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1d: Add an ECN decap test")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Ido Schimmel March 21, 2021, 5:20 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:33:14PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> The ECN bit defines ECT(1) = 1, ECT(0) = 2. So inner 0x02 + outer 0x01

> should be inner ECT(0) + outer ECT(1). Based on the description of

> __INET_ECN_decapsulate, the final decapsulate value should be

> ECT(1). So fix the test expect value to 0x01.

> 

> Before the fix:

> TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x02                                 [FAIL]

>         Expected to capture 10 packets, got 0.

> 

> After the fix:

> TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x01                                 [ OK ]

> 

> Fixes: a0b61f3d8ebf ("selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1d: Add an ECN decap test")

> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>


Fixes: b723748750ec ("tunnel: Propagate ECT(1) when decapsulating as recommended by RFC6040")

The commit you cited is from 2018 whereas this one is from 2020. The
test stopped working after the latter. The reason I didn't see it is
because this commit only changed one caller of __INET_ECN_decapsulate().
Another caller is mlxsw which uses the function to understand how to
program the hardware to perform decapsulation. See commit 28e450333d4d
("inet: Refactor INET_ECN_decapsulate()").

After your patch I get:

TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x01                                 [FAIL]
        Expected to capture 10 packets, got 0.

Fixed by:

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c
index b8b08a6a1d10..61eb34e20fde 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c
@@ -341,7 +341,12 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_ipip_ecn_decap_init_one(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
        u8 new_inner_ecn;
 
        trap_en = __INET_ECN_decapsulate(outer_ecn, inner_ecn, &set_ce);
-       new_inner_ecn = set_ce ? INET_ECN_CE : inner_ecn;
+       if (set_ce)
+               new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_CE;
+       else if (outer_ecn == INET_ECN_ECT_1)
+               new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_ECT_1;
+       else
+               new_inner_ecn = inner_ecn;
 
        mlxsw_reg_tidem_pack(tidem_pl, outer_ecn, inner_ecn, new_inner_ecn,
                             trap_en, trap_en ? MLXSW_TRAP_ID_DECAP_ECN0 : 0);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c
index e5ec595593f4..74f2c4ce7063 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c
@@ -913,7 +913,12 @@ static int __mlxsw_sp_nve_ecn_decap_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
        u8 new_inner_ecn;
 
        trap_en = !!__INET_ECN_decapsulate(outer_ecn, inner_ecn, &set_ce);
-       new_inner_ecn = set_ce ? INET_ECN_CE : inner_ecn;
+       if (set_ce)
+               new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_CE;
+       else if (outer_ecn == INET_ECN_ECT_1)
+               new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_ECT_1;
+       else
+               new_inner_ecn = inner_ecn;
 
        mlxsw_reg_tndem_pack(tndem_pl, outer_ecn, inner_ecn, new_inner_ecn,
                             trap_en, trap_en ? MLXSW_TRAP_ID_DECAP_ECN0 : 0);

I will prepare a patch

> ---

>  tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh | 2 +-

>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

> 

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh

> index ce6bea9675c0..0ccb1dda099a 100755

> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh

> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh

> @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ test_ecn_decap()

>  	# In accordance with INET_ECN_decapsulate()

>  	__test_ecn_decap 00 00 0x00

>  	__test_ecn_decap 01 01 0x01

> -	__test_ecn_decap 02 01 0x02

> +	__test_ecn_decap 02 01 0x01

>  	__test_ecn_decap 01 03 0x03

>  	__test_ecn_decap 02 03 0x03

>  	test_ecn_decap_error

> -- 

> 2.26.2

>
Hangbin Liu March 22, 2021, 1:16 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 07:20:55PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:33:14PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:

> > The ECN bit defines ECT(1) = 1, ECT(0) = 2. So inner 0x02 + outer 0x01

> > should be inner ECT(0) + outer ECT(1). Based on the description of

> > __INET_ECN_decapsulate, the final decapsulate value should be

> > ECT(1). So fix the test expect value to 0x01.

> > 

> > Before the fix:

> > TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x02                                 [FAIL]

> >         Expected to capture 10 packets, got 0.

> > 

> > After the fix:

> > TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x01                                 [ OK ]

> > 

> > Fixes: a0b61f3d8ebf ("selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1d: Add an ECN decap test")

> > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>

> 

> Fixes: b723748750ec ("tunnel: Propagate ECT(1) when decapsulating as recommended by RFC6040")

> 

> The commit you cited is from 2018 whereas this one is from 2020. The

> test stopped working after the latter. The reason I didn't see it is

> because this commit only changed one caller of __INET_ECN_decapsulate().

> Another caller is mlxsw which uses the function to understand how to

> program the hardware to perform decapsulation. See commit 28e450333d4d

> ("inet: Refactor INET_ECN_decapsulate()").


Hi Ido,

Thanks for this info. I don't have mlxsw card in hand, so I never
run the driver test before.

Cheers
Hangbin

> 

> After your patch I get:

> 

> TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x01                                 [FAIL]

>         Expected to capture 10 packets, got 0.

> 

> Fixed by:

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c

> index b8b08a6a1d10..61eb34e20fde 100644

> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c

> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c

> @@ -341,7 +341,12 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_ipip_ecn_decap_init_one(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,

>         u8 new_inner_ecn;

>  

>         trap_en = __INET_ECN_decapsulate(outer_ecn, inner_ecn, &set_ce);

> -       new_inner_ecn = set_ce ? INET_ECN_CE : inner_ecn;

> +       if (set_ce)

> +               new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_CE;

> +       else if (outer_ecn == INET_ECN_ECT_1)

> +               new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_ECT_1;

> +       else

> +               new_inner_ecn = inner_ecn;

>  

>         mlxsw_reg_tidem_pack(tidem_pl, outer_ecn, inner_ecn, new_inner_ecn,

>                              trap_en, trap_en ? MLXSW_TRAP_ID_DECAP_ECN0 : 0);

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c

> index e5ec595593f4..74f2c4ce7063 100644

> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c

> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c

> @@ -913,7 +913,12 @@ static int __mlxsw_sp_nve_ecn_decap_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,

>         u8 new_inner_ecn;

>  

>         trap_en = !!__INET_ECN_decapsulate(outer_ecn, inner_ecn, &set_ce);

> -       new_inner_ecn = set_ce ? INET_ECN_CE : inner_ecn;

> +       if (set_ce)

> +               new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_CE;

> +       else if (outer_ecn == INET_ECN_ECT_1)

> +               new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_ECT_1;

> +       else

> +               new_inner_ecn = inner_ecn;

>  

>         mlxsw_reg_tndem_pack(tndem_pl, outer_ecn, inner_ecn, new_inner_ecn,

>                              trap_en, trap_en ? MLXSW_TRAP_ID_DECAP_ECN0 : 0);

> 

> I will prepare a patch
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh
index ce6bea9675c0..0ccb1dda099a 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@  test_ecn_decap()
 	# In accordance with INET_ECN_decapsulate()
 	__test_ecn_decap 00 00 0x00
 	__test_ecn_decap 01 01 0x01
-	__test_ecn_decap 02 01 0x02
+	__test_ecn_decap 02 01 0x01
 	__test_ecn_decap 01 03 0x03
 	__test_ecn_decap 02 03 0x03
 	test_ecn_decap_error