Message ID | 20210508175537.202-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [RESEND] arm: Enlarge IO_SPACE_LIMIT needed for some SoC | expand |
... > Well, an obvious question would be: do you really need that much IO > space? PCs have got away with 64K of IO space without having a problem > for years, so 64K per bus should be fine. If you have 3 buses, that > should be 3 * 64K or 192K. Not only that, but most modern PCI (even) cards don't require IO space. Or does this include memory space - which can be much bigger. I have cut one of our FPGA PCIe slaves down from two 8MB BARs to two 1MB ones, with the extra small BARs (eg for MSI-X) the bridge would have allocated 32MB, now 4MB. Fortunately that card only needs to work on x86-64. David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h index fc748122f1e0..6f3e89f08bd8 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ void __iomem *pci_remap_cfgspace(resource_size_t res_cookie, size_t size); #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MACH_IO_H #include <mach/io.h> #elif defined(CONFIG_PCI) -#define IO_SPACE_LIMIT ((resource_size_t)0xfffff) +#define IO_SPACE_LIMIT ((resource_size_t)0xffffff) #define __io(a) __typesafe_io(PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE + ((a) & IO_SPACE_LIMIT)) #else #define __io(a) __typesafe_io((a) & IO_SPACE_LIMIT)
Ipq8064 SoC requires larger IO_SPACE_LIMIT or second and third pci port fails to register the IO addresses and connected device doesn't work. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.9+ Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> --- arch/arm/include/asm/io.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)