Message ID | 1395686975-12649-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 18:49 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On return to guest, if there are no free LRs and we still have more > interrupt to inject, set GICH_HCR_UIE so that we are going to receive a > maintenance interrupt when no pending interrupts are present in the LR > registers. > The maintenance interrupt handler won't do anything anymore, but > receiving the interrupt is going to cause gic_inject to be called on > return to guest that is going to clear the old LRs and inject new > interrupts. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> > Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> > > --- > > Changes in v5: > - introduce lr_all_full() helper. I see you've also added the comment to the interrupt handler which was requested last time but in the next patch where it also logically belongs. Make sense. Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c index dbba5d3..a7b29d8 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(irq_desc_t[NR_LOCAL_IRQS], local_irq_desc); static DEFINE_PER_CPU(uint64_t, lr_mask); static unsigned nr_lrs; +#define lr_all_full() (this_cpu(lr_mask) == ((1 << nr_lrs) - 1)) /* The GIC mapping of CPU interfaces does not necessarily match the * logical CPU numbering. Let's use mapping as returned by the GIC @@ -738,6 +739,11 @@ void gic_inject(void) vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(current, current->domain->arch.evtchn_irq); gic_restore_pending_irqs(current); + + if ( !list_empty(¤t->arch.vgic.lr_pending) && lr_all_full() ) + GICH[GICH_HCR] |= GICH_HCR_UIE; + else + GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE; } int gic_route_irq_to_guest(struct domain *d, const struct dt_irq *irq,