Message ID | 20210816105934.28265-2-irui.wang@mediatek.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Enable two H264 encoder cores on MT8195 | expand |
Hi Irui, On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 08:00, Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com> wrote: > > Enable MT8195 two H.264 venc cores, updates vcodec binding document. > > Signed-off-by: Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt > index de961699ba0a..eb2e24c32426 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt > @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ Required properties: > "mediatek,mt8173-vcodec-dec" for MT8173 decoder. > "mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-enc" for MT8192 encoder. > "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-enc" for MT8195 encoder. > + "mediatek,mtk-venc-core0" for MT8195 avc core0 device. > + "mediatek,mtk-venc-core1" for MT8195 avc core1 device. What is the difference between core0 and core1? Thanks, Ezequiel
Hi,Ezequiel, Thanks for your reviewing. On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 08:02 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Hi Irui, > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 08:00, Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com> > wrote: > > > > Enable MT8195 two H.264 venc cores, updates vcodec binding > > document. > > > > Signed-off-by: Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek- > > vcodec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek- > > vcodec.txt > > index de961699ba0a..eb2e24c32426 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt > > @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ Required properties: > > "mediatek,mt8173-vcodec-dec" for MT8173 decoder. > > "mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-enc" for MT8192 encoder. > > "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-enc" for MT8195 encoder. > > + "mediatek,mtk-venc-core0" for MT8195 avc core0 device. > > + "mediatek,mtk-venc-core1" for MT8195 avc core1 device. > > What is the difference between core0 and core1? > > Thanks, > Ezequiel Both core0 and core1 are H264 encoder hardware, they have their own hardware register base, used power-domains/clocks/irqs. We can use any of them for H.264 encoding, but the two cores can work together for higher performance, it's called "frame racing", a hardware encoding mode, control flow just like in the commit messages: core0 frame#0.frame#2.frame#4... core1 frame#1.frame#3.frame#5... Thanks
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 23:04, Irui Wang (王瑞) <Irui.Wang@mediatek.com> wrote: > > Hi,Ezequiel, > > Thanks for your reviewing. > > On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 08:02 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > Hi Irui, > > > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 08:00, Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Enable MT8195 two H.264 venc cores, updates vcodec binding > > > document. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek- > > > vcodec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek- > > > vcodec.txt > > > index de961699ba0a..eb2e24c32426 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt > > > @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ Required properties: > > > "mediatek,mt8173-vcodec-dec" for MT8173 decoder. > > > "mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-enc" for MT8192 encoder. > > > "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-enc" for MT8195 encoder. > > > + "mediatek,mtk-venc-core0" for MT8195 avc core0 device. > > > + "mediatek,mtk-venc-core1" for MT8195 avc core1 device. > > > > What is the difference between core0 and core1? > > > > Thanks, > > Ezequiel > > Both core0 and core1 are H264 encoder hardware, they have their own > hardware register base, used power-domains/clocks/irqs. We can use any > of them for H.264 encoding, but the two cores can work together for > higher performance, it's called "frame racing", a hardware encoding > mode, control flow just like in the commit messages: > > core0 frame#0.frame#2.frame#4... > core1 frame#1.frame#3.frame#5... > If they are two encoder cores, why do you need different compatible strings? It would be interesting to see a device tree which shows how this should be used in the real world, but from the looks of it, it seems you don't need a separate compatible. It seems this series is somewhat related to Yunfei's "[PATCH v5, 00/15] Using component framework to support multi hardware decode", but I don't see a device tree patch either in that series. Given this is a complex architecture, I don't know if it makes sense to discuss decoder and encoder independently. If you guys unify the two series, and add the device tree patches for it, or at least for the most complex cases, maybe that will surface the architecture more clearly and come up with an easier solution that doesn't involve an async framework to pull in the parts together. Thanks, Ezequiel
On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 00:49 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 23:04, Irui Wang (王瑞) <Irui.Wang@mediatek.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi,Ezequiel, > > > > Thanks for your reviewing. > > > > On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 08:02 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > > Hi Irui, > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 08:00, Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Enable MT8195 two H.264 venc cores, updates vcodec binding > > > > document. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt | > > > > 2 ++ > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek- > > > > vcodec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek- > > > > vcodec.txt > > > > index de961699ba0a..eb2e24c32426 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek- > > > > vcodec.txt > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek- > > > > vcodec.txt > > > > @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ Required properties: > > > > "mediatek,mt8173-vcodec-dec" for MT8173 decoder. > > > > "mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-enc" for MT8192 encoder. > > > > "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-enc" for MT8195 encoder. > > > > + "mediatek,mtk-venc-core0" for MT8195 avc core0 device. > > > > + "mediatek,mtk-venc-core1" for MT8195 avc core1 device. > > > > > > What is the difference between core0 and core1? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ezequiel > > > > Both core0 and core1 are H264 encoder hardware, they have their own > > hardware register base, used power-domains/clocks/irqs. We can use > > any > > of them for H.264 encoding, but the two cores can work together for > > higher performance, it's called "frame racing", a hardware encoding > > mode, control flow just like in the commit messages: > > > > core0 frame#0.frame#2.frame#4... > > core1 frame#1.frame#3.frame#5... > > > > If they are two encoder cores, why do you need different compatible > strings? > > It would be interesting to see a device tree which shows how this > should > be used in the real world, but from the looks of it, it seems you > don't > need a separate compatible. > We want to use the two cores through one device node, core0 and core1 bind to device "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-enc", it's feasible to make two cores work by just opening one device, the device tree looks like: venc { compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-enc" } venc_core0 { compatible = "mediatek,mtk-venc-core0" interrupts = xxxx clocks = xxxx power-domains = xxxx ... } venc_core1 { compatible = "mediatek,mtk-venc-core1" interrupts = xxxx clocks = xxxx power-domains = xxxx ... } as you can see, node "venc" just has compatible string, it's just used for register "/dev/videoX" device node in probe process. The encoder real hardware device are node "venc_core0" and "venc_core1", bind them to "venc" in probe process. > It seems this series is somewhat related to Yunfei's "[PATCH v5, > 00/15] Using component framework to support multi hardware decode", > but I don't see a device tree patch either in that series. > > Given this is a complex architecture, I don't know if it > makes sense to discuss decoder and encoder independently. > > If you guys unify the two series, and add the device tree patches for > it, > or at least for the most complex cases, maybe that will surface the > architecture more clearly and come up with an easier solution that > doesn't involve > an async framework to pull in the parts together. > > Thanks, > Ezequiel Yes, this series have a similar purpose with Yunfei's patch, he has a requirement for dual cores decoder, mine are dual cores encoder, about the usage of framework component, it can be discussed together. Thanks
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt index de961699ba0a..eb2e24c32426 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ Required properties: "mediatek,mt8173-vcodec-dec" for MT8173 decoder. "mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-enc" for MT8192 encoder. "mediatek,mt8195-vcodec-enc" for MT8195 encoder. + "mediatek,mtk-venc-core0" for MT8195 avc core0 device. + "mediatek,mtk-venc-core1" for MT8195 avc core1 device. - reg : Physical base address of the video codec registers and length of memory mapped region. - interrupts : interrupt number to the cpu.
Enable MT8195 two H.264 venc cores, updates vcodec binding document. Signed-off-by: Irui Wang <irui.wang@mediatek.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-vcodec.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)