@@ -1062,6 +1062,16 @@ static void rtw89_core_rx_stats(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
rtw89_iterate_vifs_bh(rtwdev, rtw89_vif_rx_stats_iter, &iter_data);
}
+static void rtw89_core_correct_vht_rate(struct ieee80211_rx_status *rx_status)
+{
+ /* Our hardware can receive the VHT packet with rate higher than MCS 9.
+ * This kind of packet is out of specification and dropped by mac80211,
+ * and it leads very low TCP throughput.
+ */
+ if (rx_status->encoding == RX_ENC_VHT && rx_status->rate_idx > 9)
+ rx_status->rate_idx = 9;
+}
+
static void rtw89_correct_cck_chan(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
struct ieee80211_rx_status *status)
{
@@ -1106,6 +1116,7 @@ static void rtw89_core_rx_pending_skb(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
rtw89_correct_cck_chan(rtwdev, rx_status);
rtw89_core_hw_to_sband_rate(rx_status);
rtw89_core_rx_stats(rtwdev, phy_ppdu, desc_info, skb_ppdu);
+ rtw89_core_correct_vht_rate(rx_status);
ieee80211_rx_napi(rtwdev->hw, NULL, skb_ppdu, &rtwdev->napi);
rtwdev->napi_budget_countdown--;
}
@@ -1334,6 +1345,7 @@ static void rtw89_core_flush_ppdu_rx_queue(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
rx_status = IEEE80211_SKB_RXCB(skb_ppdu);
rtw89_core_hw_to_sband_rate(rx_status);
rtw89_core_rx_stats(rtwdev, NULL, desc_info, skb_ppdu);
+ rtw89_core_correct_vht_rate(rx_status);
ieee80211_rx_napi(rtwdev->hw, NULL, skb_ppdu, &rtwdev->napi);
rtwdev->napi_budget_countdown--;
}
@@ -1367,6 +1379,7 @@ void rtw89_core_rx(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
} else {
rtw89_core_hw_to_sband_rate(rx_status);
rtw89_core_rx_stats(rtwdev, NULL, desc_info, skb);
+ rtw89_core_correct_vht_rate(rx_status);
ieee80211_rx_napi(rtwdev->hw, NULL, skb, &rtwdev->napi);
rtwdev->napi_budget_countdown--;
}
@@ -2322,16 +2322,17 @@ rtw89_debug_append_rx_rate(struct seq_file *m, struct rtw89_pkt_stat *pkt_stat,
static const struct rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_info {
enum rtw89_hw_rate first_rate;
int len;
+ int ext;
const char *rate_mode;
} rtw89_rx_rate_cnt_infos[] = {
- {RTW89_HW_RATE_CCK1, 4, "Legacy:"},
- {RTW89_HW_RATE_OFDM6, 8, "OFDM:"},
- {RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS0, 8, "HT 0:"},
- {RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS8, 8, "HT 1:"},
- {RTW89_HW_RATE_VHT_NSS1_MCS0, 10, "VHT 1SS:"},
- {RTW89_HW_RATE_VHT_NSS2_MCS0, 10, "VHT 2SS:"},
- {RTW89_HW_RATE_HE_NSS1_MCS0, 12, "HE 1SS:"},
- {RTW89_HW_RATE_HE_NSS2_MCS0, 12, "HE 2ss:"},
+ {RTW89_HW_RATE_CCK1, 4, 0, "Legacy:"},
+ {RTW89_HW_RATE_OFDM6, 8, 0, "OFDM:"},
+ {RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS0, 8, 0, "HT 0:"},
+ {RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS8, 8, 0, "HT 1:"},
+ {RTW89_HW_RATE_VHT_NSS1_MCS0, 10, 2, "VHT 1SS:"},
+ {RTW89_HW_RATE_VHT_NSS2_MCS0, 10, 2, "VHT 2SS:"},
+ {RTW89_HW_RATE_HE_NSS1_MCS0, 12, 0, "HE 1SS:"},
+ {RTW89_HW_RATE_HE_NSS2_MCS0, 12, 0, "HE 2ss:"},
};
static int rtw89_debug_priv_phy_info_get(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
@@ -2356,6 +2357,11 @@ static int rtw89_debug_priv_phy_info_get(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
seq_printf(m, "%10s [", info->rate_mode);
rtw89_debug_append_rx_rate(m, pkt_stat,
info->first_rate, info->len);
+ if (info->ext) {
+ seq_puts(m, "][");
+ rtw89_debug_append_rx_rate(m, pkt_stat,
+ info->first_rate + info->len, info->ext);
+ }
seq_puts(m, "]\n");
}
8852AE can receive packets with VHT MCS10/11 that is out of specification, so mac80211 warns and drops the packets, and it leads low TCP throughput. Rate marked as a VHT rate but data is invalid: MCS: 10, NSS: 2 WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7817 at net/mac80211/rx.c:4856 ieee80211_rx_list+0x223/0x2f0 [mac80211] Therefore, limit the report rate to VHT MCS9. Meanwhile, we want to know we have received this kind of packets, so show the counter of VHT MCS10/11 in debugfs, like: TP TX: 1 [1] Mbps (lv: 1), RX: 460 [438] Mbps (lv: 4) Beacon: 18 Avg packet length: TX=96, RX=3083 RX count: Legacy: [0, 0, 0, 0] OFDM: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] HT 0: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] HT 1: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] VHT 1SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0][0, 0] VHT 2SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 24, 718, 4591, 31564][418, 0] HE 1SS: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] HE 2ss: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] TX rate [0]: VHT 2SS MCS-9 SGI (hw_rate=0x119) ==> agg_wait=1 (3500) RX rate [0]: VHT 2SS MCS-9 SGI (hw_rate=0x119) RSSI: -28 dBm (raw=165, prev=163) Buglink: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192891 Reported-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/debug.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)