Message ID | 20220407150652.21885-1-gch981213@gmail.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | spi: add support for Mediatek SPI-NAND controller | expand |
On 07/04/2022 17:06, Chuanhong Guo wrote: > Add device-tree binding documentation for Mediatek SPI-NAND Flash > Interface. > > Signed-off-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com> > --- > Looks good. The subject should be rather "spi: dt-bindings:" (as requirement for SPI subsystem). Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Chuanhong, gch981213@gmail.com wrote on Thu, 7 Apr 2022 23:06:48 +0800: > this code will be used in mediatek snfi spi-mem controller with > pipelined ECC engine. > > Signed-off-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com> > --- > > Change since v1: > actually make it a module instead of a part of nandcore.o > (ECC_MXIC probablly needs a similar fix.) Please do not hesitate to propose something about it. Otherwise on the MTD side the series looks good (besides the two comments you already received). I don't know if something changed regarding the comments style in the spi subsystem, but using // everywhere looks strange, it's usually reserved for the SPDX tag, but I'll let Mark comment on it. Otherwise, MTD patches 1 and 3 look fine. Thanks, Miquèl
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 08:32:14AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Otherwise on the MTD side the series looks good (besides the two > comments you already received). What's the plan for merging then? > I don't know if something changed regarding the comments style in the > spi subsystem, but using // everywhere looks strange, it's usually > reserved for the SPDX tag, but I'll let Mark comment on it. I generally request that, it looks messy if the comment block at the top mixes styles.
Hi Mark! On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 8:28 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 08:32:14AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > Otherwise on the MTD side the series looks good (besides the two > > comments you already received). > > What's the plan for merging then? I just tested this driver on a different chip and found out it's buggy there. I'm still debugging. Please wait for v5 of this series. Sorry.
Hi Mark, gch981213@gmail.com wrote on Sat, 9 Apr 2022 19:08:57 +0800: > Hi Mark! > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 8:28 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 08:32:14AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > > > Otherwise on the MTD side the series looks good (besides the two > > > comments you already received). > > > > What's the plan for merging then? > > I just tested this driver on a different chip and found out it's buggy > there. I'm still debugging. > Please wait for v5 of this series. Sorry. We need to merge this series in an immutable branch. Perhaps as the big "part" is the SPI controller driver, it should preferably go through spi, but I'm fine either ways, let me know what you prefer. Thanks, Miquèl