Message ID | 20220802194656.240564-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | occ: Restore default behavior of polling OCC during init | expand |
On 8/3/22 01:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 02/08/2022 21:46, Eddie James wrote: >> These bindings describe the POWER processor On Chip Controller accessed >> from a service processor or baseboard management controller (BMC). >> >> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com> >> --- >> .../bindings/hwmon/ibm,occ-hmwon.yaml | 40 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ibm,occ-hmwon.yaml >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ibm,occ-hmwon.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ibm,occ-hmwon.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..8f8c3b8d7129 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ibm,occ-hmwon.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause >> +%YAML 1.2 >> +--- >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/ibm,occ-hwmon.yaml# > typo here > > Does not look like you tested the bindings. Please run `make > dt_binding_check` (see > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions). I actually did but it didn't catch that somehow. I had to use a somewhat hacked together python/pip on my system so perhaps that's to blame. > >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> + >> +title: IBM On-Chip Controller (OCC) accessed from a service processor >> + >> +maintainers: >> + - Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com> >> + >> +description: | >> + This binding describes a POWER processor On-Chip Controller (OCC) > s/This binding describes a// > But instead describe the hardware. What is the OCC? OK I'll fix that. It's a management engine for system power and thermals. > >> + accessed from a service processor or baseboard management controller >> + (BMC). >> + >> +properties: >> + compatible: >> + enum: >> + - ibm,p9-occ-hwmon >> + - ibm,p10-occ-hwmon >> + >> + ibm,inactive-on-init: >> + description: This property describes whether or not the OCC should >> + be marked as active during device initialization. The alternative >> + is for user space to mark the device active based on higher level >> + communications between the BMC and the host processor. > I find the combination property name with this description confusing. It > sounds like init of OCC and somehow it should be inactive? I assume if > you initialize device, it is active. Or maybe the "init" is of something > else? What is more, non-negation is easier to understand, so rather > "ibm,active-on-boot" (or something like that). Well, the host processor initializes the OCC during it's boot, but this document is describing a binding to be used by a service processor talking to the OCC. So the OCC may be in any state. The init meant driver init, but I will simply the description and change the property to be more explicit: ibm,no-poll-on-init since that is what is actually happening. Similar to the FSI binding for no-scan-on-init. > >> + type: boolean >> + >> +required: >> + - compatible >> + >> +additionalProperties: false >> + >> +examples: >> + - | >> + occ-hmwon { > just "hwmon" > >> + compatible = "ibm,p9-occ-hwmon"; >> + ibm,inactive-on-init; >> + }; Thanks for the review! Eddie > > Best regards, > Krzysztof