| Message ID | 1670924929-26507-3-git-send-email-quic_srivasam@quicinc.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Update section header name check | expand |
On 13/12/22 10:48, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote: > Add section header name requirement specification in elf segments. > > Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com> > --- > Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst > index 348ee7e..3125030 100644 > --- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst > +++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst > @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ if the remote processor is accessing memory directly). > > In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors would > also include a special section which we call "the resource table". > +This resource table section name may have anything appended after it, > +but it must start with ".resource_table" What do you think of: In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors would also include a special section which we call the "resource table". A "resource table" section name must start with the ".resource_table" prefix, optionally having a more descriptive string appended. For example, ".resource_table.my_rproc" is a valid section name. Regards, Phil.
On 12/15/2022 12:55 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: Thanks for your time Phil!!! > On 13/12/22 10:48, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote: >> Add section header name requirement specification in elf segments. >> >> Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com> >> --- >> Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst >> b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst >> index 348ee7e..3125030 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst >> @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ if the remote processor is accessing memory >> directly). >> In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors >> would >> also include a special section which we call "the resource table". >> +This resource table section name may have anything appended after it, >> +but it must start with ".resource_table" > > What do you think of: > > In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors would > also include a special section which we call the "resource table". > A "resource table" section name must start with the ".resource_table" > prefix, optionally having a more descriptive string appended. For > example, ".resource_table.my_rproc" is a valid section name. Okay. Will change accordingly and re-spin the patch set. > > Regards, > > Phil.
diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst index 348ee7e..3125030 100644 --- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst +++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ if the remote processor is accessing memory directly). In addition to the standard ELF segments, most remote processors would also include a special section which we call "the resource table". +This resource table section name may have anything appended after it, +but it must start with ".resource_table" The resource table contains system resources that the remote processor requires before it should be powered on, such as allocation of physically
Add section header name requirement specification in elf segments. Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@quicinc.com> --- Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)