| Message ID | 20230302155255.857065-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 3abe84ea065128f5ad1025f2176156dd04b777ee |
| Headers | show |
| Series | dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: correct description of second reg | expand |
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:52 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > The description of second IO address is a bit confusing. It is supposed > to be the MCC range which contains the slew rate registers, not the slew > rate register base. The Linux driver then accesses slew rate register > with hard-coded offset (0xa000). > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> LGTM, is this something I should just apply or will you collect a larger series of Qcom DT patches this time around as well? Yours, Linus Walleij
On Thu, 02 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The description of second IO address is a bit confusing. It is supposed > to be the MCC range which contains the slew rate registers, not the slew > rate register base. The Linux driver then accesses slew rate register > with hard-coded offset (0xa000). > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > --- > .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc8280xp-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 2 +- > .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8450-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 2 +- > .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8550-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 2:40 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > On 07/03/2023 14:32, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:52 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski > > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > > >> The description of second IO address is a bit confusing. It is supposed > >> to be the MCC range which contains the slew rate registers, not the slew > >> rate register base. The Linux driver then accesses slew rate register > >> with hard-coded offset (0xa000). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > > > LGTM, is this something I should just apply or will you collect a larger > > series of Qcom DT patches this time around as well? > > Please grab it. I think I cleaned up Qualcomm pinctrl bindings from > technical debt, thus no more work for me! OK patch applied! Also: good job! The Qualcomm bindings look very nice now. But what about these oldskool bindings? $ ls Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,*.txt Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,apq8064-pinctrl.txt Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,ipq4019-pinctrl.txt Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,apq8084-pinctrl.txt Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,ipq8064-pinctrl.txt Yours, Linus Walleij
On 09/03/2023 14:46, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Please grab it. I think I cleaned up Qualcomm pinctrl bindings from >> technical debt, thus no more work for me! > > OK patch applied! > > Also: good job! The Qualcomm bindings look very nice now. > > But what about these oldskool bindings? > $ ls Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,*.txt > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,apq8064-pinctrl.txt > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,ipq4019-pinctrl.txt > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,apq8084-pinctrl.txt > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,ipq8064-pinctrl.txt Low priority for me, but I will get to them at some point :) Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc8280xp-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc8280xp-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml index 200b3b6ccd87..a9167dac9ab5 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc8280xp-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc8280xp-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ properties: reg: items: - description: LPASS LPI TLMM Control and Status registers - - description: LPASS LPI pins SLEW registers + - description: LPASS LPI MCC registers clocks: items: diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8450-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8450-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml index 8bf51df0b231..1eefa9aa6a86 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8450-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8450-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ properties: reg: items: - description: LPASS LPI TLMM Control and Status registers - - description: LPASS LPI pins SLEW registers + - description: LPASS LPI MCC registers clocks: items: diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8550-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8550-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml index 5e90051ed314..691bf60abb8c 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8550-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8550-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ properties: reg: items: - description: LPASS LPI TLMM Control and Status registers - - description: LPASS LPI pins SLEW registers + - description: LPASS LPI MCC registers clocks: items:
The description of second IO address is a bit confusing. It is supposed to be the MCC range which contains the slew rate registers, not the slew rate register base. The Linux driver then accesses slew rate register with hard-coded offset (0xa000). Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> --- .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sc8280xp-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 2 +- .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8450-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 2 +- .../bindings/pinctrl/qcom,sm8550-lpass-lpi-pinctrl.yaml | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)