diff mbox series

[RFC,v1] ufs: poll HCS.UCRDY before issuing a UIC command

Message ID 1683620674-160173-1-git-send-email-kwmad.kim@samsung.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [RFC,v1] ufs: poll HCS.UCRDY before issuing a UIC command | expand

Commit Message

Kiwoong Kim May 9, 2023, 8:24 a.m. UTC
With auto hibern8 enabled, UIC could be working
for a while to process a hibern8 operation and HCI
reports UIC not ready for a short term through HCS.UCRDY.
And UFS driver can't recognize the operation.
UFSHCI spec specifies UCRDY like this:
whether the host controller is ready to process UIC COMMAND

The 'ready' could be seen as many different meanings. If the meaning
includes not processing any request from HCI, processing a hibern8
operation can be 'not ready'. In this situation, the driver needs to
wait until the operations is completed.

Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Kiwoong Kim May 16, 2023, 3:28 a.m. UTC | #1
> > +	do {
> > +		val = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_CONTROLLER_STATUS) &
> > +			UIC_COMMAND_READY;
> > +		if (val)
> > +			break;
> > +		usleep_range(500, 1000);
> Hi Kiwoong,
> It looks like you are sleeping while holding the spin_lock_irqsave(hba-
> >host->host_lock, flags) in ufshcd_send_uic_cmd()?

You're right. Let me fix it.
Kiwoong Kim May 16, 2023, 3:30 a.m. UTC | #2
> > With auto hibern8 enabled, UIC could be working for a while to process
> > a hibern8 operation and HCI reports UIC not ready for a short term
> > through HCS.UCRDY.
> > And UFS driver can't recognize the operation.
> > UFSHCI spec specifies UCRDY like this:
> > whether the host controller is ready to process UIC COMMAND
> >
> > The 'ready' could be seen as many different meanings. If the meaning
> > includes not processing any request from HCI, processing a hibern8
> > operation can be 'not ready'. In this situation, the driver needs to
> > wait until the operations is completed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
> Is this replaces your previous suggestion -
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1682385635-43601-1-git-send-email-
> kwmad.kim@samsung.com/
> Or is it addressing another issue?
> 
> Thanks,
> Avri
> 

No, they are different. This is about reporting UIC ready and what you mentioned
is about reporting UIC busy in a certain race condition.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 96ce6af..fc79539 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -2368,7 +2368,18 @@  static inline int ufshcd_hba_capabilities(struct ufs_hba *hba)
  */
 static inline bool ufshcd_ready_for_uic_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 {
-	return ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_CONTROLLER_STATUS) & UIC_COMMAND_READY;
+	ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_ms(ktime_get(), UIC_CMD_TIMEOUT);
+	u32 val = 0;
+
+	do {
+		val = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_CONTROLLER_STATUS) &
+			UIC_COMMAND_READY;
+		if (val)
+			break;
+		usleep_range(500, 1000);
+	} while (ktime_before(ktime_get(), timeout));
+
+	return val ? true : false;
 }
 
 /**